By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A former Tennessee law enforcement officer is suing Perry County and its sheriff after being jailed for over a month for a Facebook meme referencing a comment by Donald Trump following a school shooting. The post was made in response to a vigil for conservative activist Charlie Kirk and was interpreted by the sheriff as a threat to a local high school, even though the meme referenced a different school in another state. Bushart was charged with “threatening mass violence at a school” and held on a $2 million bond. The lawsuit alleges violations of Bushart’s First and Fourth Amendment rights, seeks a jury trial, and claims he lost his post-retirement job due to the incarceration, while the county and officials have not yet commented on the lawsuit.
Read the original article here
Man sues Tennessee county after he was jailed over a meme related to Charlie Kirk killing: Well, this story is a wild ride, and it all revolves around a meme. Not just any meme, but one that landed a Tennessee man, we’ll call him Bushart, in jail. And the reason? It was related to Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist, and the meme involved a quote by Donald Trump. Apparently, Bushart was arrested over a Facebook post.
This whole situation stinks of a blatant First Amendment violation. It’s hard to look at this case and see anything other than an attempt to silence someone for expressing an opinion, even if that opinion was delivered via a meme and involved a quote from Donald Trump. It seems like a classic case of selective enforcement, where the authorities are more concerned with shutting down speech they don’t like than upholding the rights guaranteed to all citizens. The fact that the meeting Bushart was criticizing was organized by the Chief of Police, the same one who ordered his arrest, adds an extra layer of, shall we say, “irony.”
The lawsuit itself is seeking a jury trial, as well as financial compensation in the form of both compensatory and punitive damages. The claim also points out that Bushart lost his post-retirement job in medical transportation because his incarceration prevented him from doing his duties. This is a clear example of how government overreach can have a very real impact on a person’s life, extending far beyond the initial violation of their rights. Bushart’s case highlights the potential for serious consequences when the government oversteps its boundaries and infringes on individual liberties.
The amount of the bond was also astounding: $2 million, over a Facebook post. This is the kind of thing that makes you question the priorities of the authorities involved. It’s almost comical in its absurdity, especially when compared to the kinds of speech that are often deemed acceptable, even when those remarks are far more inflammatory. Many people are hoping that he gets awarded a substantial amount of money.
This whole situation also exposes the hypocrisy that often seems to rear its ugly head in political discourse. The same people who champion free speech when it aligns with their views are suddenly quick to condemn it when it doesn’t. It’s a sad state of affairs when political ideology seems to trump the principles of the First Amendment. It underscores how some will readily abandon their stated principles when it suits their political agenda.
The fact that this happened in a conservative area just adds another layer to the story. It reveals that this sort of thing can happen anywhere, and that no community is immune to the potential for abuse of power. The suggestion that it is a “North Korea thing” underscores the feeling of many that individual freedoms are being eroded. The meme itself, which was just a Trump quote, shows how absurd this all is. The question of whether it even counts as a “meme” if it is just a quote is also valid, adding to the absurdity.
The legal repercussions of this case could be significant. If Bushart wins, as many people are hoping he will, it could force the county to re-evaluate its policies and practices. It could also set a precedent that could protect others from similar abuses of power. The hope is that this case can be used to overturn some of the insane and scare tactics used by the current administration.
The focus on the sheriff and the potential for a change in leadership is crucial. This is about accountability, and if the sheriff acted improperly, he should be held responsible. It’s about ensuring that those in positions of power understand that there are consequences for their actions, and that they cannot trample on the rights of citizens without repercussions. It also is a commentary on the potential for local elections to have significant impacts on citizens’ rights.
It really is an example of what can happen when people in power abuse their authority. This case is about more than just a meme; it’s about the very foundation of our democracy, and the freedoms that are meant to be protected at all costs. It’s about holding those in power accountable and making sure that the First Amendment remains a cornerstone of our society. This should serve as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting free speech and resisting any attempts to silence dissent.