The families of two men, now 38 years old, are accusing a North Dakota hospital of robbing them of their intended lives after DNA tests revealed they were switched at birth. Kyle Bylin and Jeremy Morrison, born on the same day at Unity Medical Center, discovered the mix-up through genetic testing. While the hospital maintains no evidence points to staff responsibility, the families cite the loss of precious time and experiences they would have otherwise shared with their biological relatives, leading to a lawsuit alleging emotional distress.
Read More
A former FBI employee terminated over displaying a Pride flag is seeking to proceed with his discrimination and retaliation lawsuit, asking a federal judge to reject the government’s attempt to dismiss key claims. Despite the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss, the former employee’s attorneys argue that sufficient allegations of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act have been made, and that discovery should begin to allow for the examination of internal records and testimony. This legal battle stems from the employee’s dismissal by FBI Director Kash Patel shortly before his graduation from the FBI Academy, an action Maltinsky’s legal team contends was based on his sexual orientation and protected activities.
Read More
A lawsuit alleges the Trump administration unlawfully provided confidential personal information of Iranian asylum applicants to the Iranian government. This data, reportedly shared with Iranian officials, includes details on pro-democracy protesters, religious minorities, and LGBTQ+ individuals. The suit claims such disclosures risk deportation and persecution, torture, or death for these vulnerable applicants upon their return to Iran. Despite senators’ concerns raised in February regarding the dangers of deportation to Iran, the suit contends that the US has proceeded with sharing such sensitive information, even meeting with Iranian officials in March 2025 to discuss deportations.
Read More
The U.S. Justice Department has initiated a significant legal challenge, filing a lawsuit against both Virginia and California, along with their respective state police forces. This action stems from laws enacted in these states that the Justice Department contends unconstitutionally prohibit the purchase and sale of common semi-automatic rifles. The department views these state-level prohibitions as a direct affront to established constitutional principles regarding the right to bear arms, sparking a nationwide discussion about the scope and limitations of such rights.
It’s natural to wonder why these particular states are being targeted when other jurisdictions also have similar gun control measures in place.… Continue reading
President Trump has called The New York Times’ reporting on the war against Iran “treasonous” and stated he will add these reports to his ongoing lawsuit against the newspaper. The president’s remarks follow the Times’ analysis suggesting minimal strategic change after months of conflict, a claim Trump disputes by asserting Iran’s severe military and economic damage. Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit, initially dismissed, was refiled and is currently active, with the Times and other defendants seeking dismissal.
Read More
A progressive nonprofit and five Utah residents have filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Military Installation Development Authority (MIDA) and its approval of Kevin O’Leary’s Stratos Project data center. The plaintiffs allege MIDA, as an unelected body, is exercising unauthorized powers and violating Box Elder County residents’ rights by limiting public input on land use, taxation, and public safety decisions across a vast area. The lawsuit also contends that the presence of state legislators on the MIDA board violates prohibitions against holding multiple public offices, potentially rendering the project’s approval void.
Read More
Four detainees have filed a federal lawsuit alleging human rights abuses and “horrific” conditions at the largest Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in the U.S., Camp East Montana at Fort Bliss. The complaint details allegations of severe medical neglect, physical violence by guards, squalid living conditions, spoiled food, and outbreaks of disease. This lawsuit, seeking class-action status, marks the first legal challenge against the facility, with advocates calling for its closure due to prior reports of detainee deaths and numerous detention standard violations.
Read More
Ball State University has settled a lawsuit for $225,000 with a former employee whose termination over a private Facebook post about conservative activist Charlie Kirk was alleged to violate her free-speech rights. The university cited significant campus disruption and potential harm to enrollment and fundraising as reasons for the dismissal, but the ACLU argued the employee was speaking as a private citizen on a matter of public concern, protected by the First Amendment. This settlement follows similar cases where employees were terminated for social media comments about Kirk’s death, resulting in six-figure settlements for the affected individuals.
Read More
A lawsuit filed by staff members alleges that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has been promoting her own Christian beliefs to employees through proselytizing emails, leading them to fear negative consequences for not sharing her religion. While Rollins’ methods are less overtly aggressive than some colleagues, her communications, like an Easter email emphasizing “victory and new life,” are seen as coercive. The lawsuit contends that these actions create an unwelcoming environment, alienating employees who hold different beliefs, including those who are not Christian or are LGBTQ. This behavior reflects a broader trend of Christian nationalists within the government seeking to marginalize those who do not align with their views.
Read More
Two law enforcement officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, have filed a lawsuit to block a $1.8 billion government fund, alleging it functions as a “slush fund” intended to benefit those involved in the Capitol riot. The officers contend the fund, established as part of a settlement following a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump and his organization against the IRS over tax return leaks, is an illegal “corrupt sham.” While government officials state that individuals harmed by the government can apply for funds, they clarify that simply being a January 6 rioter does not guarantee payment.
Read More