USDA budget cuts

Trump’s USDA Mural Sparks Authoritarianism Comparisons

A large portrait of Donald Trump has been installed on the USDA headquarters, juxtaposed with a picture of Abraham Lincoln. This has drawn strong criticism, with many comparing the move to authoritarian regimes like North Korea and the Soviet Union due to its propagandistic nature. The placement next to Lincoln, a symbol of democracy, is particularly controversial. While the USDA claims the banner honors both Lincoln and Trump, critics also point to budget cuts under Trump’s administration as ironic.

Read More

Giant Trump Banner Sparks Outrage Near Lincoln at USDA

To celebrate its 163rd anniversary, the USDA displayed large banners of Presidents Trump and Lincoln on its building. The prominent placement of the Trump portrait, reminiscent of authoritarian regimes, sparked considerable online criticism, with many drawing comparisons to propagandistic imagery. Secretary Rollins, who recently implemented significant policy changes including rescinding DEI programs and workforce reductions, defended the display as celebrating Trump’s vision for the department. The timing coincides with a large-scale employee resignation program initiated by the Trump administration.

Read More

USDA Replaces 15,000 Employees With 73, Sparking Concerns Over Efficiency and Political Motivation

The USDA, after offering over 15,000 employees paid leave in exchange for resignation, is now actively recruiting to fill critical positions. Secretary Rollins acknowledged that the process wasn’t perfect and that some employees who left may be invited back, despite initial claims that key positions weren’t included in the second round of departures. However, conflicting accounts exist regarding the participation of certain agencies, like APHIS, in the second round of the deferred resignation program. Rollins maintains that no APHIS employees participated, despite employee testimonies to the contrary. The USDA is addressing the situation and working to resolve the discrepancies.

Read More

USDA Reverses Salmonella Limits in Raw Poultry: Public Health Concerns Explode

The USDA has withdrawn a proposed rule that would have mandated salmonella limits in poultry products, citing over 7,000 public comments. This decision reverses a Biden-era initiative aimed at reducing the 1.35 million annual salmonella infections, many foodborne, and approximately 420 associated deaths. Industry groups applauded the withdrawal, while advocates criticized the move as prioritizing industry concerns over public health. The USDA will now evaluate whether to update existing salmonella regulations.

Read More

Trump Budget Cuts Starve Food Banks: Millions in Food Aid Cancelled

The Trump administration’s budget cuts led to the cancellation of 20 truckloads of food—approximately 500,000 pounds—destined for the Greater Cleveland Food Bank, impacting deliveries scheduled between April and July 2025. This resulted in a loss of roughly $1 million worth of food, including staples like milk, eggs, and meat. The cancellations stemmed from a broader USDA suspension of $500 million in funding for nationwide food bank programs, part of a review of Commodity Credit Corp. funding. While the USDA claims to continue TEFAP purchases, the food bank, already facing a state budget cut, emphasizes the significant impact on their ability to meet community needs.

Read More

USDA Halts Food Delivery to Michigan, Sparking Outrage

Feeding America West Michigan faces a critical shortage of 600,000 pounds of food due to the USDA’s cancellation of 32 scheduled truckloads from its Emergency Food Assistance Program. This $1.1 million loss, attributed to a federal review and program pause, exacerbates existing challenges, including potential reductions in food assistance eligibility and the food bank’s current 50% subsidization of federal programs. The food bank is actively seeking alternative sources, including farmers and donors, to ensure continued food distribution, though the food offered may differ from what was originally planned. The situation underscores the significant impact of federal budget cuts on food security.

Read More

USDA Scrambles to Rehire Bird Flu Experts After Accidental Firings

In an effort to cut costs, the USDA inadvertently terminated several bird flu experts, a move it is now working to rectify. These terminations, part of broader federal workforce reductions, impacted essential personnel despite exemptions for veterinarians and emergency responders. The highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak, responsible for the culling of 148 million birds and impacting egg prices and human health, necessitates these experts’ continued employment. These actions follow recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency and coincide with the cancellation of numerous contracts, some related to DEI initiatives.

Read More

USDA Accidentally Fires Bird Flu Officials, Attempts Rehiring

The USDA accidentally fired several employees involved in the federal response to the H5N1 avian flu outbreak over the weekend. The agency is working to immediately reverse these firings, classifying these positions as crucial to public safety and food supply. These layoffs, part of broader government cuts, caused concern among Republican lawmakers who warned of potential harm to the bird flu response. The incident highlights the challenges and unintended consequences of rapid government downsizing.

Read More

Conditional Approval for Avian Flu Vaccine Sparks Debate

The USDA conditionally licensed Zoetis’ avian flu vaccine for chickens, aiming to combat the devastating outbreak impacting egg prices. This conditional license, granted due to the vaccine’s demonstrated safety and efficacy, offers a potential solution to the ongoing crisis. While the US historically prioritized eradication through culling, the vaccine’s approval signals a potential shift in strategy, given the virus’s increasing spread and severity. The high cost of eggs is expected to persist into 2025, driven by the outbreak and broader inflation.

Read More

USDA Deletes Climate Change References from Websites: A Dangerous Denial

The USDA’s directive to remove mentions of climate change from public websites is a deeply troubling development. It represents an alarming attempt to erase a scientifically established reality from public discourse, a move that undermines efforts to address the impending climate crisis and jeopardizes the well-being of countless individuals and communities. The sheer audacity of this action suggests a deliberate effort to downplay the severity of the situation and, perhaps, to prevent any meaningful policy responses.

This blatant disregard for scientific consensus is particularly egregious given the significant impact climate change is already having on agricultural practices and food security. The USDA, an agency responsible for supporting and regulating agriculture, should be at the forefront of addressing climate change’s impacts, not actively suppressing information about it.… Continue reading