As the four-year anniversary of the overturning of Roe v. Wade approached, civil rights attorney Azaleea Carlea of Portland highlighted Sen. Susan Collins’ pivotal role in this decision. Collins’ vote to appoint Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, despite assurances that Roe v. Wade was settled law, is seen as directly leading to the rollback of abortion rights. This has resulted in 63 million women living in states with bans and has exacerbated issues with emergency medical treatment, maternal health, and the safety of domestic violence survivors. Therefore, many in Maine believe Collins’ actions demonstrate a lack of accountability and fitness for office, advocating for a change in representation.
Read More
Four years on, Maine Democrats are increasingly vocal in their conviction that Senator Susan Collins’ vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court directly contributed to the landmark reversal of abortion rights. This sentiment, echoed by many who feel betrayed by the senator’s actions, stems from the belief that Collins was a crucial, perhaps decisive, vote for a nominee who ultimately played a key role in overturning Roe v. Wade. The argument, frequently made, is that her support for Kavanaugh, despite his perceived flaws and the potential implications for reproductive freedom, was a critical misstep with devastating consequences.
The core of the accusation lies in Senator Collins’ stated assurances that she was satisfied with Kavanaugh’s private assurances that Roe v.… Continue reading
The sentiment that Senator Susan Collins bears significant responsibility for the overturning of Roe v. Wade is a prevalent one, stemming from her pivotal role in confirming Supreme Court justices who ultimately led to that outcome. Her public statements and voting record have fueled this perception, with many pointing to her assurances to constituents that she would protect abortion rights, followed by her votes for justices who subsequently dismantled those rights. This has led to accusations of deception and a perceived betrayal of trust, particularly among those who advocate for reproductive freedom.
Collins’ supporters might argue that she acted in good faith, believing the assurances given by the judicial nominees during their confirmation processes.… Continue reading
Senator Susan Collins recently drew criticism for misstating the Supreme Court’s vote to overturn Roe v. Wade as 6-3, when the actual decision was 5-4. She also claimed Justice Brett Kavanaugh would not have been a pivotal vote, despite his role in the majority that ended the federal right to abortion. This assertion was directly challenged by her Democratic opponent, Graham Platner, who accused Collins of lying and stated that Kavanaugh was indeed the deciding vote. Collins has maintained she does not regret confirming Kavanaugh, even as millions of women now face restricted access to reproductive healthcare.
Read More
Senator Susan Collins recently faced significant criticism for inaccurately stating that the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade was a 6-3 ruling and that Justice Brett Kavanaugh was not a pivotal vote. The actual vote was 5-4, with Justice Kavanaugh casting the deciding vote. Her Democratic challenger, Graham Platner, accused Collins of lying and highlighted her role in confirming Kavanaugh, despite the known implications for abortion rights. Organizations like Planned Parenthood Action Fund have endorsed Platner, citing Collins’s record and the impact of the Dobbs decision on reproductive healthcare access.
Read More
Senator Susan Collins has once again found herself defending her vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh, reiterating her stance that she does not regret the decision. This persistent defense, years after the contentious confirmation process, highlights a fundamental disconnect between the Senator’s perspective and the views of many of her constituents and observers who see her vote as having had significant, negative consequences for the nation. The core of her defense appears to rest on the promise or understanding she believed she had regarding Kavanaugh’s respect for established legal precedents, particularly *Roe v. Wade*.
However, the subsequent overturning of *Roe v.… Continue reading
A California resident, Nicholas Roske, was sentenced to eight years and one month in prison for attempting to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Although prosecutors sought a sentence of no less than 30 years, the judge cited Roske’s abandonment of the plot and atypical circumstances as reasons for leniency. Roske, who had a pistol, knife, and other tools, told investigators she was angry about the leaked draft opinion on Roe v. Wade and believed Kavanaugh would vote to loosen gun laws. The Justice Department has announced plans to appeal what it considers an insufficient sentence.
Read More
Justice Clarence Thomas recently stated that settled legal precedent should not be treated as “gospel,” suggesting some decisions may be based on questionable foundations. He criticized the court’s adherence to precedent, advocating for a re-evaluation of “stare decisis.” Thomas’s remarks come before the Supreme Court’s new term and follow the overturning of Roe v. Wade, where he also expressed a desire to reconsider other substantive due process precedents. This stance reflects a broader conservative effort to dismantle precedents related to civil liberties and social progress.
Read More
Mississippi has declared a public health emergency due to a sharp increase in infant mortality, with the rate reaching its highest level in over a decade, and a rate of 9.7 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2024. Leading causes of infant deaths include congenital malformations, preterm birth, low birth weight, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. The health department plans to address the issue by expanding access to obstetric care, strengthening community health programs, and educating families. This rise comes after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which restricted access to healthcare in Mississippi and potentially contributed to the increase.
Read More
The anti-abortion movement’s strategic use of women in leadership roles to deflect accusations of misogyny is crumbling. With Roe v. Wade overturned and Trump’s return, open sexism is now embraced, leading to internal conflict and attacks on women, even within the movement itself. This escalating misogyny manifests in legislative efforts targeting women’s voting rights and divorce laws, disproportionately affecting Republican women. Simultaneously, incidents of violence against women, both politically active and privately involved with powerful Republican men, underscore the growing danger for women in the current political climate.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood