US Senate hopeful Graham Platner advocates for Democrats to “deal with” the Supreme Court if they regain power, suggesting oversight and potential impeachments to remove justices. He believes holding Supreme Court justices to the same ethical standards as federal judges could lead to the impeachment and removal of at least two. Platner also proposes expanding the Supreme Court’s size when a Democrat is in the White House, emphasizing the need for senators willing to wield such power.
Read More
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was hospitalized last month after falling ill at a Federalist Society dinner in Philadelphia, where he was treated for dehydration. While this incident was previously unreported, Supreme Court spokeswoman Patricia McCabe confirmed the visit and stated Alito returned home that night and resumed his duties the following Monday. The news has fueled speculation about Alito’s potential retirement, though sources close to him indicate no immediate decision has been made.
Read More
In a recent interview, President Donald Trump expressed his desire for Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to remain on the bench, highlighting their positive contributions. The current conservative majority of the court, solidified by Trump’s previous appointments, has been a key factor in decisions impacting areas like immigration. Both Justices Thomas and Alito have served for many years, with Thomas being the longest-serving current member. While there has been speculation about their potential retirements, neither justice has publicly announced plans to step down.
Read More
Congressman Jamie Raskin’s request for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito to recuse himself from the Donald Trump case, following a reported phone call between the two, has ignited a firestorm of debate. The call itself raises serious questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly given the high stakes of the Trump case and Justice Alito’s known conservative leanings. Raskin’s call for recusal is a direct response to this perceived conflict, aiming to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
The lack of immediate action on Raskin’s request highlights a deeper concern about accountability within the Supreme Court. The perceived absence of consequences for Justice Alito’s actions underscores the limitations of existing mechanisms to address ethical breaches by Supreme Court justices.… Continue reading
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Trump the day before Trump’s lawyers petitioned the court to halt his upcoming hush-money sentencing. Alito claims the call, at the request of a former law clerk, solely concerned a job recommendation and did not involve the pending petition. However, the timing raises ethical concerns regarding potential protocol violations given the court’s consideration of Trump’s appeal. Trump’s legal team argues the sentencing would interfere with the presidential transition, citing potential presidential immunity. The Supreme Court will now consider Trump’s petition.
Read More
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Trump regarding a former law clerk’s job application, a conversation that occurred before Trump filed an emergency appeal to delay his sentencing. Alito stated the call did not involve Trump’s pending case or any other matter before the Supreme Court. While recommending former clerks for positions is common, this instance is notable given the timing and the potential for criticism regarding the Court’s independence. The call has already drawn renewed scrutiny of Alito’s conduct.
Read More
El Al has extended its suspension of flights to Moscow until the end of March 2024. This decision follows an earlier temporary suspension implemented last week. The airline cited the recent crash of an Azerbaijani passenger plane, widely believed to have been downed by a Russian air defense system, as a contributing factor to the extended cancellation. The suspension reflects growing safety concerns regarding air travel to and from Moscow.
Read More
A Senate Judiciary Committee report details previously undisclosed luxury travel accepted by Justice Clarence Thomas, funded by Harlan Crow, exceeding $4.75 million in value since 1991. The report also cites Justice Samuel Alito’s misuse of a hospitality exemption for a 2008 trip. The investigation, prompted by concerns over ethics violations, recommends Congress create an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court’s new code of conduct, which lacks such provisions. Republicans opposed the investigation and did not participate in the report.
Read More
As I sit here, reflecting on the recent event of AOC introducing articles of impeachment against Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, I can’t help but feel a mixture of hope and despair. The idea of holding individuals accountable, even those in the highest positions of power, resonates deeply with me. It’s a reminder that no one, regardless of their status or influence, is above the law.
The Supreme Court, meant to be an institution that upholds justice and fairness, should not be exempt from scrutiny. The allegations of ethical lapses and corruption surrounding Thomas and Alito are troubling, to say the least.… Continue reading
When I read about the Turkish airport workers refusing to refuel the El Al plane after an emergency landing, I couldn’t help but shake my head in disbelief. The fact that fuel was about to be provided due to humanitarian considerations, only for the captain to suddenly decide to leave on his own accord, raises some serious questions in my mind. Why would he make such a risky decision at a critical moment? Wouldn’t refueling the plane and getting it back on track after the emergency landing be the logical thing to do to ensure the safety of the passengers and crew?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood