A lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court by West Point law professor Tim Bakken alleges the U.S. Military Academy is violating the First Amendment by restricting professors’ opinions in the classroom and censoring certain books and courses. The suit, seeking class-action status for West Point’s civilian faculty, claims the academy began scrutinizing faculty speech following a January executive order. According to the lawsuit, West Point has implemented policies that control and suppress faculty speech by requiring approval for public comments, removing content from webpages, and preventing instructors from expressing opinions in the classroom.
Read More
In a rare show of political agreement, Senators Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz have both criticized the FCC’s Chair Brendan Carr for allegedly pressuring ABC to suspend Jimmy Kimmel following comments made about the suspected assassin of Charlie Kirk. Sanders stated the government cannot force anyone off the air due to disagreements, with Cruz likening Carr’s actions to a mafia boss. The senators’ statements came amid broader concerns about First Amendment rights, with others suggesting the Trump administration is using its position to silence opposing views. This situation resulted in the introduction of the FREE SPEECH Act.
Read More
Senator Rand Paul criticized Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr’s remarks threatening action against ABC after Jimmy Kimmel’s comments. Paul asserted that Carr’s involvement was inappropriate, emphasizing that while individuals have a right to free speech, employers also have the right to make employment decisions based on an employee’s statements. Paul also stated that the government should not be involved in such matters and called for politics to be removed from the judicial system. Paul further commented on Trump’s social media posts, arguing that “lawfare in all forms is bad,” although he acknowledged that both parties have used politically motivated prosecutions in the past.
Read More
Pete Buttigieg goes viral for predicting Trump’s free speech crackdown. The core of the viral moment revolves around a clip from Buttigieg during last year’s presidential campaign. In the clip, he warned that free speech would be under threat in the US, specifically because Trump had expressed intentions to punish media outlets for their coverage. This, as many point out, is a fairly straightforward prediction considering Trump’s well-documented history of antagonism towards the media.
It’s worth noting that the response to Buttigieg’s “prediction” is varied. Some acknowledge the obvious nature of the forecast, given Trump’s established patterns. Others frame it less as a profound insight and more as an observation that anyone paying attention could have made.… Continue reading
Trump Says Critical Coverage of Him Is ‘Really Illegal’
So, the idea that critical coverage of a president is “really illegal”? That’s the core of the issue. It’s a statement that throws a wrench into the very foundation of a free press and the democratic principles of the United States. This isn’t just about disagreeing with a politician; it’s about questioning the basic tenets of how a government and its people interact. Imagine a world where truth is censored, where dissenting voices are silenced. That’s the kind of environment this statement seemingly champions.
It’s worth remembering some wise words from Theodore Roosevelt, spoken more than a century ago.… Continue reading
The recent indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel due to remarks about Charlie Kirk highlights a concerning trend of stifled free speech, mirroring tactics once employed by the left. This “woke” right, led by figures like Donald Trump and J.D. Vance, is attempting to silence dissent, often using the same justification previously used by social justice activists. Unlike past crackdowns, this effort lacks widespread support and a clear mandate, relying instead on fear and intimidation. Ultimately, this MAGA-driven cultural control is doomed to fail, as it lacks the cultural backing of previous periods of moral panic, and the First Amendment will continue to be challenged but never destroyed.
Read More
During a press conference, President Trump asserted that negative media coverage of him is “really illegal,” arguing that it constitutes cheating rather than free speech. He cited the high percentage of unfavorable stories about him as evidence of unfair treatment by news outlets, likening them to extensions of the Democratic National Committee. This stance follows the administration’s crackdown on free speech in the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death, which has drawn criticism from both liberals and some conservatives, including former President Barack Obama and Senator Ted Cruz. The administration’s actions include the firing of an MSNBC analyst and the indefinite pulling of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show, after pressure from the FCC chairman.
Read More
In Chicago, former journalist and congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh was thrown to the ground by an ICE agent during a protest. Video footage of the incident went viral, showing an agent grabbing and throwing Abughazaleh onto the road. Abughazaleh, who was protesting, stated that the incident was a violation of First Amendment rights and an abuse of power, adding that it pales in comparison to what immigrant communities face. This incident drew mixed reactions, with some right-wing figures expressing approval of the assault.
Read More
President Trump’s announcement of designating antifa as a “major terrorist organization” has raised questions due to antifa’s decentralized nature and lack of formal structure. Experts note that the president lacks the authority to designate domestic terrorist organizations. The potential implications of this designation remain unclear, though it could potentially lead to increased scrutiny and investigations by law enforcement. However, some experts fear that such a designation may infringe on free speech rights and potentially raise Fourth Amendment concerns regarding surveillance.
Read More
Trump: ‘It’s no longer free speech.’ This statement, echoing a sentiment of frustration, seems to be the core of the matter here. It’s a striking claim, especially coming from a figure who often champions himself as a defender of free speech. The idea is that if the majority of media coverage is critical, it somehow ceases to be legitimate speech. The context reveals that Trump was likely referring to the perceived negative portrayal of his actions and decisions, as if the abundance of negative stories somehow negates the very principle of free expression.
This raises a multitude of questions. Does the volume of negative reporting, regardless of its accuracy or validity, invalidate the right to report?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood