A federal judge has ordered a halt to the Trump administration’s removal of Jan. 6-related videos and court records from government websites, following a lawsuit by a coalition of news organizations. The coalition alleges the administration purged these records from the USA File Exchange (USAfx) database, citing the disappearance of video exhibits from at least one case as evidence. Judge Boasberg mandated that the administration identify all removed materials and provide justifications by February 26th. The news organizations argue that these records are subject to public access rights under the First Amendment and that their removal hinders public understanding of the events of January 6th.
Read More
The White House barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from presidential events after the AP refused to use President Trump’s newly decreed name, “Gulf of America,” for the Gulf of Mexico. The White House deemed the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” as a lie and retaliated by restricting access, a move condemned by press freedom advocates as a violation of the First Amendment. While the White House claims Oval Office access is a privilege, critics argue this action constitutes censorship and intimidation. Several major news organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, similarly rejected the name change, citing the body of water’s international boundaries and long-established name.
Read More
In response to the Associated Press’s refusal to adopt the President’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America,” the White House barred two AP reporters from White House events. This action, deemed unacceptable by the AP and the White House Correspondents Association, is seen as a violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press. The incident follows previous White House actions against news organizations and raises concerns about the administration’s relationship with the media. While some map services have changed their naming conventions to reflect the President’s decree, the AP maintains its journalistic independence by using established geographical names.
Read More
Over two dozen Christian and Jewish organizations, representing millions of Americans, filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Trump administration policy expanding immigration agents’ authority to conduct arrests in houses of worship. The lawsuit argues this policy violates religious freedom by creating fear, reducing attendance, and hindering ministries to immigrants, regardless of legal status. The plaintiffs contend the policy’s chilling effect on religious practice is unconstitutional, citing the administration’s disregard for houses of worship as traditionally protected spaces. The Department of Justice, in response to a similar lawsuit, argued the claims are based on speculation, but the new suit’s wide-ranging plaintiff base significantly increases pressure on the administration.
Read More
Trump’s announcement of a task force to “eradicate anti-Christian bias” has sparked a firestorm of debate and controversy. The very notion of such a task force raises immediate concerns about the separation of church and state, a cornerstone of American democracy. Many see this as a blatant attempt to privilege one religious group over others, potentially violating the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom.
The proposed task force’s mission seems inherently problematic. Defining and measuring “anti-Christian bias” is incredibly challenging, if not impossible. What constitutes bias? Is it simply criticism of Christian doctrine or actions by individuals identifying as Christian? Is it the expression of different religious beliefs?… Continue reading
Six major US publishers, along with authors, libraries, and other organizations, are suing Idaho over its book-banning law, HB 710. This law prohibits minors from accessing books deemed “harmful,” a vaguely defined term leading to widespread self-censorship by libraries. The lawsuit argues the law violates First Amendment rights and forces libraries into untenable positions, including removing essential materials and impacting community services. This is the third such lawsuit filed by publishers against state book bans, highlighting a growing national concern over censorship and its chilling effect on intellectual freedom.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi issued multiple memos outlining new DOJ policies, including reviving the death penalty, targeting sanctuary cities, and enforcing a return-to-office mandate. A particularly striking memo targets private sector Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) initiatives, potentially subjecting them to criminal investigation. This action, based on a dubious interpretation of the *Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard* ruling, threatens First Amendment rights by suppressing speech and association related to DEIA. The memo directs investigations and potential criminal penalties against companies with DEIA programs, potentially leading to immediate legal challenges.
Read More
Two lawsuits allege that the Department of Justice (DOJ) violated FBI agents’ First Amendment rights and the Privacy Act by compiling and circulating their identities in connection with January 6th and classified documents investigations. Agents fear potential retaliation, including termination, demotion, or denial of opportunities, from both direct Trump-related actions and indirect actions by DOJ loyalists potentially sharing this information with his supporters. The lawsuits aim to prevent further collection and dissemination of this sensitive information. The FBI Agents Association is also involved, amplifying concerns about the potential exposure of agents’ personal information and the risk of reprisal.
Read More
Nine anonymous FBI agents are suing the Department of Justice, alleging a retaliatory campaign to purge agents involved in investigations of Donald Trump and the January 6th Capitol attack. The lawsuit cites a DOJ survey seeking to identify these agents, raising concerns about potential termination, demotion, or other reprisals. Agents fear their personal information will be compromised, citing Elon Musk’s allies’ attempts to access government databases. The suit claims violations of First Amendment rights and federal privacy laws, seeking to block the release of the survey.
Read More
Senator Bernie Sanders condemned President Trump’s pattern of suing media outlets, citing CBS News’ potential settlement of a $10 billion lawsuit and ABC News’ $15 million settlement as alarming precedents. Sanders argued that these settlements, along with instances of self-censorship by major news organizations, create a chilling effect on investigative journalism and threaten the First Amendment. He emphasized the importance of an independent press free from intimidation and fear of retribution for reporting critical information. This intimidation, Sanders warned, prevents crucial investigations and ultimately endangers the democratic process.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood