Several prominent news organizations, including The New York Times, The Associated Press, and Newsmax, have refused to sign a new Defense Department document outlining press rules, potentially leading to the eviction of their reporters from the Pentagon. These outlets argue the policy infringes upon First Amendment rights by restricting access and threatening to punish routine news gathering. The new rules require journalists to acknowledge the policy, which bars access to significant areas of the Pentagon without an escort and allows the Defense Secretary to revoke press access for unauthorized information requests. Pentagon officials maintain the policy establishes “common sense media procedures,” while journalists counter that signing the document implies reporting on unapproved information harms national security, a claim they refute.
Read More
Tensions have arisen within the Department of Energy (DOE) between experienced government personnel and a private sector team, described as the “Colorado and DOGE crew,” who are reportedly less inclined to adhere to established procedures. Initially, the DOE was prepared to announce $30 billion in funding awards, but the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) intervened, postponing the announcement to leverage the funds. Subsequently, the OMB Director announced an $8 billion cut to lawfully approved energy project funding, targeting 16 Democratic-led states, while the fate of the remaining $22 billion, predominantly allocated to Republican districts, remains uncertain.
Read More
Terri Lesley, a former Wyoming library director fired amidst a book dispute involving sexually explicit content and LGBTQ+ themes, will receive $700,000 in a settlement after suing Campbell County officials. Lesley’s termination occurred after public officials sided with book objectors, with Lesley claiming her First Amendment rights were violated. The county denied Lesley’s claims, asserting the dismissal was based on performance, not the book controversy. Lesley’s attorney hopes the settlement sends a message about the importance of the First Amendment and anti-discrimination values.
Read More
A Chicago pastor, Rev. David Black, injured during a protest outside a Broadview ICE facility, is now a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s response to demonstrations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, media organizations, clergy, and local residents, alleging that federal agents used excessive force, including tear gas and pepper balls, against peaceful protestors. The plaintiffs argue that these actions violated First Amendment rights and are seeking to restrict federal tactics at the facility. The court is currently considering a temporary restraining order while the case proceeds.
Read More
The article highlights the Trump administration’s aggressive actions against non-citizen residents, specifically targeting them based on their speech and viewpoints. Judge William Young, in *American Association of University Professors v Rubio*, ruled the administration violated the First Amendment by detaining and deporting pro-Palestinian foreign scholars, emphasizing that the Constitution does not differentiate between citizens and immigrants regarding freedom of speech. Young’s decision condemned Trump’s actions as unconstitutional and a threat to fundamental rights, citing instances of immigrants like Mahmoud Khalil and Rümeysa Öztürk being targeted for their speech. The judge’s opinion extends beyond the immediate case, framing Trump’s actions as a broader threat to American values and urging Americans to defend constitutional principles.
Read More
A federal judge in Boston ruled against the Trump administration, declaring its efforts to deport noncitizens for protesting the war in Gaza unconstitutional. The judge sided with university associations, finding the policy, which they labeled as ideological deportation, to be a violation of the First Amendment. During the trial, the plaintiffs presented witnesses who argued that the administration specifically targeted students and scholars critical of Israel. Lawyers for the Trump administration countered by arguing that there was no policy based on protected speech.
Read More
The legal ramifications of Charlie Kirk’s assassination are unfolding in court as educators challenge their firings and suspensions. These faculty members claim their First Amendment rights were violated due to social media posts regarding the incident. A federal judge has already ordered the reinstatement of a University of South Dakota professor, while a high school teacher in Iowa is also suing over a similar situation. Experts emphasize that professors have a protected right to speak on public matters, with even offensive political speech, such as rhetorical hyperbole, being safeguarded. Consequently, this burgeoning legal battle is poised to be a significant test case for free speech in the context of political fallout.
Read More
Following the termination or suspension of educators due to controversial social media posts regarding the death of Charlie Kirk, several individuals are now pursuing legal action, citing violations of their First Amendment rights. These lawsuits challenge the disciplinary actions taken by universities and school districts, arguing their speech, made in a private capacity on matters of public concern, is protected. Legal experts disagree on the extent of First Amendment protection in these cases, with distinctions drawn between speech related to an employee’s job duties and speech made as a private citizen. Some experts believe that while political speech is highly protected, the courts give universities more leeway than K-12 schools when considering the disruption caused by such speech.
Read More
President Trump has recently intensified his criticism of press freedom and the First Amendment. During a recent statement, he suggested that negative coverage of his administration by journalists should be illegal. These comments follow the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s program by ABC, owned by Disney, after threats were made regarding the revocation of broadcast licenses. In response, writers and actors gathered in protest to defend free speech.
Read More
Hegseth’s purge of service members cheering Kirk killing comes under heavy scrutiny, or at least, that’s what the narrative seems to be focusing on. It’s hard to ignore the underlying currents, though, and what it might reveal about the current state of things. It seems like the primary concern is the potential politicization of the military, turning it into an extension of a specific political ideology rather than a force dedicated to defending the country as a whole. The emphasis seems to be less on genuine mourning or outrage, and more on the perceived hypocrisy, considering the selective application of rules and the historical context of soldiers celebrating the deaths of perceived enemies.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood