A federal judge in Louisiana has blocked the state’s new law mandating the display of the Ten Commandments in every public classroom, deeming it unconstitutional. The judge ruled that the law’s purpose is overtly religious, rejecting the state’s argument that the Ten Commandments hold historical significance to U.S. law. The decision, which grants a preliminary injunction against the law, finds that the state’s requirement would violate the First Amendment by establishing a religion and coercing students into religious participation. This ruling aligns with a 1980 Supreme Court decision that found a similar Kentucky law unconstitutional, highlighting the ongoing debate over the intersection of religion and public education.
Read More
Project 2025, a conservative manifesto authored by Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation, calls for the outright banning of pornography in the United States. The manifesto argues that pornography should be outlawed, its creators and distributors imprisoned, and that even those involved in its distribution through education and libraries should be designated as sex offenders. The manifesto’s authors believe that pornography is not protected by the First Amendment and argue that it is harmful and addictive. With a conservative-leaning Supreme Court, Project 2025 believes it can overturn the current legal precedent set by Miller vs. California, which protects sexually explicit material that meets specific criteria. This could have significant consequences for the entertainment industry, sex education, and the broader definition of what constitutes obscenity.
Read More
Former US President Donald Trump has made a potentially dangerous statement at a rally in Pennsylvania, suggesting he wouldn’t mind if an attempt to assassinate him involved shooting through members of the media. Both Trump and current Vice President Kamala Harris have been speaking behind panels of bulletproof glass as a security measure following an assassination attempt against Trump in July. After pointing out the glass in front of him, Trump mentioned that there was no glass between him and the media, stating someone would have to “shoot through the fake news” to get him. This comment sparked concerns about it being a potential call for violence.
Read More
As I delve into the recent events surrounding the Federal judge’s critique of the DeSantis administration for threatening TV stations, I am struck by the blatant disregard for the fundamental rights outlined in the First Amendment. It is appalling to witness government officials attempting to silence dissenting voices and control the narrative through intimidation and coercion. The cease-and-desist letters sent to television stations airing a pro-abortion ad are a clear violation of free speech and a prime example of viewpoint discrimination.
The lawsuit filed against the state’s health department for these threats is a crucial step in upholding our constitutional rights.… Continue reading
As an Oklahoman parent and a concerned citizen, the recent news of top education officials attempting to mandate the Bible in public school classrooms is not only outrageous but a blatant violation of the separation of church and state. The attempt to bypass the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment under the guise of academic necessity is laughable. Ryan Walters, in Oklahoma, is pushing for the integration of the Christian Bible into core subjects like math and science, claiming it’s for historical context. But let’s be real, this is a clear attempt to indoctrinate children into one specific religion under the guise of education.… Continue reading
I can’t believe that in this day and age, we are still dealing with issues of voter intimidation and discrimination. The recent incident involving a MAGA Sheriff’s post about Harris yard signs getting his department booted from election duties is truly disheartening. It’s alarming to see a law enforcement official using their position to target individuals based on their political beliefs.
The fact that people had to take down their yard signs out of fear is a clear indication of the impact such irresponsible behavior can have on our democratic process. Threatening lawsuits for invasion of privacy, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil rights violations just shows how serious this issue is.… Continue reading
As FCC Chair, I stand firmly against any attempts to undermine the First Amendment, especially when it comes to calls to pull broadcast licenses over disagreements with content. The recent call by Trump to pull ABC licenses over the presidential debate is not only absurd but also dangerous for our democracy. The cornerstone of our democracy is the freedom of speech, and revoking licenses based on personal grievances sets a dangerous precedent that could stifle the free press.
It is ludicrous to even entertain the idea of pulling licenses just because a political candidate disagrees with the content or coverage. The role of the FCC is to regulate communication channels, not to bend to the whims of a sore loser who can’t handle criticism.… Continue reading
Trump says we ‘gotta’ restrict the First Amendment. The mere thought of such an appalling statement should send shivers down the spine of every American who values democracy and freedom. Trump’s proposal to send someone to jail for a year for burning the American flag is not only absurd but fundamentally anti-American. The flag itself symbolizes the very freedom to engage in such acts of protest. It represents the right to dissent, to criticize, to speak out against injustice, and to challenge the status quo.
The fact that Trump is openly advocating for the restriction of the First Amendment is a clear indication of his authoritarian tendencies.… Continue reading
I can’t believe we are at a point where the former president of the United States is openly talking about restricting the First Amendment. It’s truly alarming to see someone who once swore an oath to uphold the Constitution now wanting to dismantle one of the fundamental pillars of democracy – free speech. The fact that this is even a topic of discussion is deeply concerning and highlights the dangerous path we could be headed down if we don’t take a stand against this assault on our rights.
It’s ironic how Trump and his supporters claim to be champions of freedom and choice, yet here they are advocating for the restriction of free speech.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s latest outburst claiming it to be “illegal” to criticize his Supreme Court appointees is nothing short of absurd. It begs the question: does he even understand the basic tenets of the First Amendment, or is he just conveniently ignoring them when they don’t suit his agenda? As an American citizen, I am deeply troubled by the idea that our elected officials, especially the President, would seek to restrict our right to freedom of speech and expression merely because they are being held accountable for their choices.
The notion that criticizing judges and justices should be punishable by “very serious crimes” is not only preposterous but also dangerous.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood