A federal judge denied the Associated Press’s request for a temporary restraining order against a White House ban restricting their access to President Trump’s events. While expressing skepticism about the ban’s legality and describing it as “discriminatory,” the judge cited a lack of “irreparable harm” to the AP and scheduled a hearing for March 20th to consider a preliminary injunction. The White House maintains its position, asserting that access to the President is a privilege, not a right. The AP, supported by numerous news organizations, argues the ban violates the First and Fifth Amendments.
Read More
A Maryland federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration, preventing immigration enforcement actions at specific Quaker, Cooperative Baptist, and Sikh houses of worship. This ruling, which stems from a lawsuit challenging the reversal of a Biden-era memo protecting these locations, found that the Trump administration’s policy likely violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment. The court determined the policy’s chilling effect on attendance, impacting both legal and undocumented immigrants, substantially burdens the free exercise of religion. The injunction reinstates the 2021 memo’s protections for these specific religious communities, but does not create a nationwide ban on immigration enforcement at places of worship.
Read More
The Trump administration barred Associated Press reporters from White House events for refusing to use the term “Gulf of America” instead of “Gulf of Mexico,” a decision condemned by dozens of news organizations. The AP, upholding its long-standing editorial policy, rejected the administration’s mandate to change the established geographical name. Surprisingly, even conservative outlets like Newsmax and Fox News joined the chorus of criticism, defending the AP’s First Amendment rights and warning of potential future repercussions. Despite the White House’s continued justification and refusal to reinstate the AP’s access, the AP vowed to defend its constitutional rights, highlighting growing concerns about government overreach.
Read More
David Cherry, an Indiana man, was arrested and charged with intimidation after posting threats against Elon Musk on X, including a statement about planting a bomb at Musk’s house. Cherry pleaded not guilty and his attorney plans to argue that the posts are protected political speech under the First Amendment. The case hinges on whether Cherry’s statements constitute true threats, a legal exception to free speech protections. Cherry’s trial is scheduled for August.
Read More
The Associated Press filed a lawsuit against three Trump administration officials, alleging unconstitutional suppression of speech after the White House restricted AP journalists’ access to presidential events. The restrictions, directly linked to the AP’s refusal to adopt Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, are viewed as a retaliatory measure against the news agency’s editorial independence. The lawsuit, citing the First Amendment, seeks to immediately restore the AP’s access and prevent future government interference with press freedom. The White House, however, maintains its position and anticipates a court battle.
Read More
Former NFL player Chris Kluwe was arrested at a Huntington Beach city council meeting for protesting a “MAGA” themed plaque at a local library. Kluwe denounced the plaque as a symbol of the MAGA movement’s purportedly anti-democratic and Nazi-like tendencies, citing various alleged actions of the movement. His protest, involving a deliberate disruption of the meeting, resulted in charges of disrupting an assembly. Kluwe was released after four hours, maintaining that the arresting officers were professional, despite council members criticizing his actions.
Read More
Senate Bill 114, proposing mandatory Ten Commandments displays in Montana public schools, was defeated for a second time. Despite amendments allowing, rather than requiring, district funding, the bill failed to garner enough support, with eight Republicans joining Democrats in opposition. Opponents argued the bill was unconstitutional, citing the First Amendment and lack of tribal consultation, while proponents emphasized the historical significance of the Commandments to American law and heritage. The Senate ultimately voted to indefinitely postpone the measure, effectively killing it for the session.
Read More
The Trump White House indefinitely banned the Associated Press from the Oval Office and Air Force One due to the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” despite the President’s renaming of the body of water to “Gulf of America.” This decision, condemned by the White House Correspondents Association as a First Amendment violation, prevents the AP from participating in pooled press events crucial for White House coverage. While the AP retains White House grounds credentials, the ban significantly impacts its ability to report on presidential activities. The AP is preparing a legal challenge, citing viewpoint discrimination.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered a halt to the Trump administration’s removal of Jan. 6-related videos and court records from government websites, following a lawsuit by a coalition of news organizations. The coalition alleges the administration purged these records from the USA File Exchange (USAfx) database, citing the disappearance of video exhibits from at least one case as evidence. Judge Boasberg mandated that the administration identify all removed materials and provide justifications by February 26th. The news organizations argue that these records are subject to public access rights under the First Amendment and that their removal hinders public understanding of the events of January 6th.
Read More
The White House barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from presidential events after the AP refused to use President Trump’s newly decreed name, “Gulf of America,” for the Gulf of Mexico. The White House deemed the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” as a lie and retaliated by restricting access, a move condemned by press freedom advocates as a violation of the First Amendment. While the White House claims Oval Office access is a privilege, critics argue this action constitutes censorship and intimidation. Several major news organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, similarly rejected the name change, citing the body of water’s international boundaries and long-established name.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker