The Department of Justice has filed federal conspiracy charges against congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh and five others related to a protest outside the Broadview ICE facility last month. The indictment alleges the group conspired to impede or injure federal officers during a September 26th protest, where they allegedly surrounded a government vehicle. Other protesters also face individual charges of assault and resisting officers. The accused, including Cook County board and Oak Park officials, are fighting the charges, calling them an attempt to stifle protest and an attack on First Amendment rights.
Read More
A Washington, D.C. resident is suing after being detained while protesting the National Guard deployment, alleging violations of his rights. The individual, Sam O’Hara, played “The Imperial March” from “Star Wars” as a form of protest and was subsequently detained by D.C. police after a sergeant from the Ohio National Guard contacted them. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, claims violations of the First and Fourth Amendments, as well as false arrest and battery, naming the sergeant, several D.C. officers, and the District of Columbia as defendants. This case is unfolding amidst other legal battles concerning deployments under the previous administration.
Read More
A Washington D.C. resident is suing local police officers, a member of the Ohio National Guard, and the District of Columbia after being detained while protesting the Trump administration’s deployment of National Guard troops. The plaintiff, Sam O’Hara, was playing Darth Vader’s theme song from Star Wars while following a National Guard patrol, actions he shared on TikTok. The lawsuit alleges that his First and Fourth Amendment rights were violated and that the arrest constituted false arrest, imprisonment, and battery. O’Hara seeks compensatory damages, claiming the actions of the military and law enforcement were unconstitutional.
Read More
A judge has issued a temporary restraining order preventing the Creston Community School District from firing a teacher. This order prohibits the district from taking adverse employment actions against Melissa Crook based on her social media comments regarding Charlie Kirk. However, the judge denied Crook’s request to be removed from administrative leave, meaning she will not be returning to the classroom at this time. The lawsuit was filed after Crook was placed on administrative leave and recommended for termination following her controversial post. Further court proceedings are scheduled for October 31st, 2025.
Read More
A federal judge has ruled that the Department of Defense must return books about race and gender to school libraries on military bases after the removal of nearly 600 books sparked a lawsuit. The students, children of active-duty service members, alleged their First Amendment rights were violated due to the removal of books covering topics such as sexual identity and racism. The American Civil Liberties Union filed a motion on behalf of the families, arguing the removals stemmed from partisan motivations related to executive orders prohibiting materials promoting “gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology” and guidance issued by the Secretary of Defense. Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles sided with the students, citing “improper partisan motivation” and ordering the restoration of the removed materials.
Read More
Tensions have arisen between Indiana University and its student newspaper, the *Indiana Daily Student*, resulting in the elimination of print editions and the firing of its faculty advisor, Jim Rodenbush. The advisor was terminated for refusing to censor the homecoming edition, sparking concerns about censorship and First Amendment rights. The university claims the shift from print is a financial decision, yet the move has drawn criticism from advocates for student media, alumni, and high-profile figures. The *Daily Student* continues to publish online, but the recent events have led to accusations of administrative overreach and attempts to control the paper’s editorial content.
Read More
Johnson defends calling anti-Trump protests “hate America” rallies. Let’s be clear; this is a loaded statement and the core of the issue at hand. The accusation itself is a bold one, immediately framing any opposition as fundamentally unpatriotic. This instantly shuts down a lot of potential discussion, painting those protesting as enemies of the nation, rather than citizens exercising their right to voice dissent. The reality, judging by what people are saying, paints a different picture.
The common experience seems to be a complete disconnect between Johnson’s narrative and the reality on the ground. Many participants in these rallies reported seeing primarily American flags, symbols of national pride, not symbols of hatred.… Continue reading
The upcoming “No Kings” demonstrations are anticipated to be the largest single-day protests in U.S. history, with organizers aiming to celebrate the First Amendment and resist authoritarianism. Right-wing figures and media outlets have responded with a wave of fear-mongering and disparagement, attempting to frame the protests as anti-American and inciting violence. They have deployed classic authoritarian tactics by demonizing opponents and spreading misinformation to divide and instill fear in the public. Despite the smear campaign, protesters, including whimsical inflatable creatures, are using absurdity and peaceful assembly to counter the narrative of violence and uphold American freedoms.
Read More
“Political opposition is not rebellion,” would certainly make a powerful sign, wouldn’t it? That sentiment lies at the heart of an important legal battle. An appeals court has decisively blocked Donald Trump’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops in Chicago, and this ruling underlines a crucial principle: protesting, even with acts of civil disobedience, doesn’t automatically equate to “rebellion.” The court made it unequivocally clear that the administration hadn’t presented sufficient evidence to justify such a deployment, specifically failing to demonstrate an organized rebellion or that local officials were unable to maintain law and order.
The court’s decision is significant because it extends a previous order that limited the president’s ability to federalize the National Guard, while also rejecting the administration’s core arguments about judicial oversight.… Continue reading
Following the dismissal of his initial defamation lawsuit, Donald Trump has filed an amended 40-page complaint against The New York Times, Penguin Random House, and two reporters, while maintaining a $15 billion compensatory damages claim and seeking punitive damages. The amended complaint presents an itemized list of allegations, referencing specific publications and statements. The suit, filed in Florida, revises a previous suit that was dismissed due to its excessive length and redundant content. The legal action pertains to news articles and a book discussing Trump’s work on “The Apprentice” and his inheritance, alleging factual inaccuracies in the reporting.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood