The Trump administration’s aggressive pursuit of leakers, mirroring actions under previous administrations, represents a direct attack on journalistic freedoms. Attorney General Bondi’s announcement to revive the practice of seizing reporters’ phone records and compelling testimony, coupled with her threat to prosecute whistleblowers for “treason,” significantly escalates this assault on the First Amendment. This move reverses recent, albeit insufficient, protections implemented by the Biden administration, furthering a pattern of government actions that jeopardize the ability of journalists to protect their sources and report critically on the government. The lack of a federal shield law exacerbates this situation, highlighting the vulnerability of journalists to government overreach.
Read More
The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, Oklahoma’s first publicly funded religious charter school, after the state supreme court blocked it citing First Amendment concerns. The case hinges on whether taxpayer funding of the school violates the Establishment Clause or is protected under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. A decision allowing public funding could significantly impact charter school regulations nationwide and has sparked debate among Oklahoma’s Republican leadership. Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to fully restore the Voice of America (VOA) to its previous operational state. This decision comes after a legal challenge contesting the administration’s actions, which were perceived as a blatant attempt to exert undue political influence over the news agency and suppress independent journalism. The judge’s order effectively reverses these actions, mandating a complete restoration of the VOA’s operations and resources.
The Trump administration’s efforts to undermine the VOA were seen as a direct affront to the agency’s charter, a legally binding document guaranteeing its editorial independence. This charter, established and signed into law decades ago, emphasizes the integrity of VOA’s reporting and its role as a reliable source of news and information for international audiences.… Continue reading
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), under Secretary Doug Collins, has established a taskforce to investigate alleged anti-Christian bias within the department, soliciting reports from employees via a dedicated email address. This initiative, stemming from a broader Trump administration effort to address perceived anti-Christian sentiment in government, seeks reports on various issues, including informal policies, vaccine mandate exemptions, and responses to requests for religious exemptions from certain procedures. The email requests detailed information, including names, dates, and locations, for each reported incident. Critics have denounced this initiative as a partisan attempt to favor evangelical Christianity.
Read More
On Easter Sunday, President Trump pledged to make the U.S. “more religious,” a statement that resonates with his conservative Christian base but raises questions about the separation of church and state, a cornerstone of the First Amendment. This promise plays on his “Make America Great Again” slogan and reflects his strong support among white evangelical Protestants, Catholics, and non-evangelical Protestants. Conversely, Vice President Harris enjoys significant support among other religious groups and those identifying as agnostic or atheist. The ongoing debate surrounding the interpretation of the First Amendment and the appropriate balance between religious expression and government neutrality continues to shape American political discourse.
Read More
Twelve students are suing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the head of the Pentagon school system for violating their First Amendment rights through widespread book bans targeting titles on race and gender. The lawsuit, filed by the ACLU, alleges that this censorship, stemming from Trump-era executive orders, harms students’ education and access to critical information. The bans affect DoDEA schools globally, impacting curriculum and even yearbook content. The plaintiffs seek the immediate reinstatement of removed books and curriculum materials.
Read More
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller’s statement that those who “preach hate for America” will face deportation sparked widespread criticism. Miller made the remark while defending the deportation of a Salvadoran gang member and a Hamas-supporting protester, Mahmoud Khalil. This declaration ignited concerns that the administration is undermining First Amendment protections of free speech and dissent. The controversy highlights escalating tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and the potential for suppressing political opposition.
Read More
In response to a Trump executive order deemed retaliatory, Susman Godfrey, the firm behind a successful $787 million lawsuit against Fox News, filed suit. The executive order bars the firm from federal contracts, revokes employee security clearances, and prohibits access to federal buildings. This action, described as unconstitutional and discriminatory, is viewed as part of a broader Trump administration campaign targeting law firms challenging his administration. Susman Godfrey’s lawsuit, supported by Munger Tolles & Olson, challenges the president’s actions and asserts the right of lawyers to represent clients without fear of reprisal.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the White House must restore the Associated Press’s access to events where other journalists are permitted, citing a First Amendment violation. The judge found that the administration’s restriction of AP access, based on their refusal to use President Trump’s preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico, constituted viewpoint discrimination. The ruling mandates equal access for AP, not unrestricted access for all journalists. The White House’s claim of simply narrowing the press pool was rejected by the judge, who deemed their reasoning “brazen.” The decision is a victory for free speech advocates.
Read More
The White House must now allow the Associated Press full access, a judge has ruled, solidifying the principle of equal access for journalists within the government’s purview. This ruling correctly emphasizes that if the government chooses to open its doors to some members of the press, it cannot selectively shut those doors to others based on their perceived viewpoints. This is a fundamental aspect of the First Amendment’s protection of free speech and the press, ensuring an even playing field for disseminating information to the public.
However, the practical implications of this ruling are far from straightforward. The question arises: what are the exact requirements for inclusion in the White House press corps?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood