President Trump has urged the European Union to implement tariffs, potentially up to 100%, on China and India due to their continued purchases of Russian oil. This request, confirmed by sources familiar with the matter, occurred during a meeting with U.S. and EU officials in Washington. The U.S. is prepared to reciprocate any tariffs levied by Europe, mirroring their actions. This proposal follows Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which yielded limited progress toward ending the war in Ukraine.
Read More
Lithuania is urging the EU to take decisive steps to make Ukraine’s EU membership application a reality, according to a letter sent to EU capitals. The letter proposes starting technical-level negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, potentially excluding Hungary initially if 26 member states agree, while also suggesting a 2030 target year for accession. Lithuania believes that initiating negotiations would boost Ukrainian morale and support reforms amid intensified Russian military actions, while inaction could weaken public support and the will for reform. This proposal, along with the broader context of the war and potential political influences, will be discussed at the upcoming EU foreign ministers’ meeting in Copenhagen.
Read More
Germany has committed to providing Ukraine with €9 billion in annual support for the next several years, as announced by Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Finance Lars Klingbeil during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The commitment was made after discussions with Ukrainian Finance Minister Serhii Marchenko regarding continued support. Klingbeil emphasized that this funding, agreed upon by the federal government, will not waver, sending a clear message to Russian President Vladimir Putin. This announcement followed Klingbeil’s disagreement with calls to reduce social benefits for Ukrainian refugees and was coupled with a justification for increased German military spending.
Read More
In response to a request from Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, European leaders will meet with former U.S. President Trump in the White House to discuss the ongoing conflict. The meeting, called after Trump’s discussion with Russian President Putin, aims to exchange information and discuss peace efforts following the meeting in Alaska. European leaders, including Chancellor Merz, intend to emphasize Germany’s interest in a quick peace agreement while ensuring Ukraine’s interests and territorial integrity are protected. The meeting serves as a precursor to a potential three-way negotiation including Zelenskyy and Putin, despite Putin’s current reluctance to participate.
Read More
Europe is sending heavy hitters to Washington alongside Ukraine’s president to bolster Kyiv, and it’s generating a lot of discussion. The situation is clearly complex and charged with emotion, given the ongoing war and the shifting geopolitical landscape. Some view the presence of European leaders as a positive step, a show of solidarity and a necessary counterweight to potential moves by certain American figures. The idea is that these “heavy hitters” bring expertise, influence, and a commitment to Ukraine’s defense that can help offset the influence of those who might have different priorities.
However, there’s also a significant undercurrent of skepticism and even cynicism about the entire endeavor.… Continue reading
Following President Trump’s meeting with Putin in Alaska, European leaders expressed support for his efforts to end the war in Ukraine, but emphasized that Ukraine must determine its own borders. A joint statement from several European leaders, released after a phone call with Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, indicated readiness to work towards a trilateral summit with European support. Despite Trump’s shift towards seeking a peace agreement instead of a ceasefire, EU officials like Kaja Kallas and Donald Tusk remain skeptical of Russia’s intentions and reiterate the need for pressure and security guarantees for Ukraine. The leaders also reiterated that international borders should not be changed by force.
Read More
European Union leaders have emphasized that Ukraine’s borders should not be altered through force, with the people of Ukraine retaining the right to determine their own future. This statement, signed by 26 out of 27 leaders, highlights the EU’s concern over Moscow’s actions and commitment to territorial integrity. The declaration comes ahead of a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, where potential peace deals involving territorial swaps, including the Donbas region and Crimea, may be discussed. EU members strongly oppose the formal recognition of Russia’s control over territories conquered by force, understanding the constitutional implications of such a decision.
Read More
The European Union clarified that its pledge to invest over a trillion dollars in US energy and infrastructure is not legally binding, according to Brussels. This follows President Trump’s threat of a 35% tariff if the EU didn’t fulfill its commitment, which is a key component of the recent EU-US trade deal. The deal also includes an EU agreement to purchase $750 billion in US energy by 2028. While a 15% tariff “ceiling” has been agreed upon, tariffs on EU cars and parts remain at 27.5%, and the timeline for reducing them is unclear.
Read More
European leaders are urging Donald Trump to include Ukraine in a planned summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Concerns have been raised, particularly from Germany, about any potential deals that exclude Ukraine and its interests. While the US is aiming for a summit involving Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy, European officials have emphasized the necessity of Ukraine’s involvement and a potential ceasefire. Several leaders across Europe have stated that decisions regarding Ukraine’s future must include Ukraine, and any negotiations should consider its sovereignty and security.
Read More
NATO unleashes a new $10 billion “combat wallet” for Ukraine, a move that feels like a significant escalation, especially in the face of escalating attacks on Ukrainian civilians. The sheer amount of funding, seemingly designed to keep the flow of arms and support continuous, is a clear signal of the West’s resolve. I can’t help but think of the potential impact of such a massive influx of resources, especially if it includes long-range missiles, which could drastically alter the battlefield dynamics. This “combat wallet” concept, a clever piece of wording, paints a picture of a decisive response to the ongoing aggression.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood