The world has entered a post-western era marked by illiberal international disorder, as exemplified by potential actions of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. A recent global poll reveals a decline in European and global confidence in the US as an ally. The path forward requires a new internationalism that embraces power while rejecting force, and focuses on results over rules. Actions need to be taken regarding Greenland, including diplomatic visits and strengthening financial ties to the EU, which would demonstrate resolve in the face of uncertainty.
Read More
European troops arrive in Greenland to ‘ensure Arctic security’. It’s quite a turn of events, isn’t it? We’re talking about European nations, usually allies of the United States, sending troops to Greenland, ostensibly to bolster security in the Arctic. The implications are pretty significant, and it’s a situation that has a lot of people scratching their heads.
The core of the concern, as it seems to be developing, is the possibility of a shift in the global power dynamic. Some people see this as a reaction to perceived instability or unpredictability from a major player. There’s a feeling that traditional alliances might be strained, forcing countries to reassess their security strategies.… Continue reading
European Union officials are publicly supporting Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s stance on the potential ramifications of a U.S. attack on another NATO country, a position shared privately by EU diplomats. Frederiksen stated that a military attack on a NATO ally by the U.S. would effectively end the alliance. This statement contrasts with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte’s assertion that the alliance is not in crisis. Amidst this, former U.S. President Donald Trump, when questioned about prioritizing Greenland over NATO, did not directly answer but suggested a potential choice between the two.
Read More
French President Emmanuel Macron has discussed the potential deployment of approximately 10,000 soldiers to Ukraine. The deployment would involve two multinational brigades, forming part of a European Union “deterrence force” with a command center near Paris. Discussions included the weapons these brigades would utilize, with parliament set to be involved in the decision-making process within the coming weeks. The composition is likely to lean toward mechanized infantry due to limited tank availability. This initiative is part of a broader coalition supporting Ukraine with logistics, weapons, military training, and air defense, including efforts to secure the Black Sea.
Read More
US Vice President JD Vance has cautioned European leaders to take Donald Trump’s interest in Greenland seriously, particularly concerning missile defense and the potential for Russian and Chinese influence on the island. Trump, after the US military’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, renewed his push for Greenland, and is not opposed to the use of military force. Envoys from Denmark and Greenland have met with US officials to address Trump’s demands, while the UK and its European allies have released a joint statement pledging to defend Greenland’s territorial integrity. Trump desires ownership of Greenland, rather than just using it for military bases as the United States currently does under a 1951 treaty.
Read More
EU Council President Antonio Costa recently affirmed the European Union’s support for Greenland and Denmark, emphasizing that decisions regarding Greenland’s future must involve its people. Costa’s statement was made in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, which Trump views as crucial for U.S. military strategy. Highlighting the importance of international law, Costa asserted that the EU would not tolerate violations regardless of the location. He further underscored the EU’s commitment to upholding international law and multilateralism.
Read More
France: working with allies on plan should US make move on Greenland, the core of this unsettling scenario, underscores a disturbing shift in global dynamics. The very premise—that the United States might contemplate, let alone execute, a move on Greenland—is a stark indicator of a potential fracturing of the established world order. This isn’t just about geopolitics; it’s about trust, alliances, and the foundational principles of international relations. The gravity of such a hypothetical situation demands careful consideration and strategic planning, and France, with its historical role in international affairs and its deep commitment to European stability, would undoubtedly be at the forefront of crafting a response.… Continue reading
European allies working on a plan should the US move on Greenland is becoming a chillingly realistic scenario, prompting a flurry of discussion and, hopefully, concrete action. The very idea of the United States considering a military move against a fellow NATO member, even if it’s Greenland (under Danish sovereignty), is a sign of a world order teetering on the edge. The gravity of such a potential act is driving European nations to seriously consider how they would respond.
One of the first concerns that pops into mind is the potential impact on US military bases across Europe. If the US were to take military action against Greenland, it seems perfectly reasonable to assume that some European nations would be forced to reconsider the presence of US military bases within their borders.… Continue reading
The announcement that the protection of Greenland will be discussed within NATO, if needed, sparks a lot of thoughts, and frankly, a lot of skepticism. It immediately raises questions about the very nature of NATO, its purpose, and the potential threats to its core principles. The initial reaction is one of questioning the logic of addressing potential aggression against a territory like Greenland within the NATO framework, particularly when the perceived aggressor is a powerful member state – the United States. It’s almost absurd to consider a scenario where NATO, a defensive alliance, would need to discuss protecting a member’s territory from another member.… Continue reading
Following U.S. President Donald Trump’s revived threats to control Greenland, former European Council President Donald Tusk issued a warning, raising concerns over potential American actions. These remarks followed the U.S. strikes on Venezuela, leading to fears in Europe that Washington could attempt a takeover of Greenland. The dramatic operation prompted a stern rebuke from Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who stated that annexing the Arctic island would “make absolutely no sense,” with other Nordic nations expressing their support. The EU’s response to the U.S. intervention in Venezuela has been varied, with calls for restraint and criticism of the attack on the nation’s sovereignty.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood