Mark Kelly’s blunt assessment of Pete Hegseth as “totally unqualified” really hits home, doesn’t it? The sheer audacity of the situation, the idea that someone like Hegseth, given his background, could be considered for a position where he would oversee military personnel, is what Kelly found so “ridiculous.” It’s hard to disagree. It seems like the whole thing is just absurd.
Kelly’s comments on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” were a clear indication of how many people feel. While acknowledging the importance of journalists, the Senator pointed out that Hegseth’s background, is not aligned with the requirements of such a high level role.… Continue reading
Recent departures from the Justice Department have illuminated a troubling picture of the agency under the Trump administration, according to former employees. Farewell letters describe a department grappling with compromised ethics, undue pressure, and a toxic atmosphere, with some warning of lasting damage. These departures include those who refused to drop cases for political reasons, whistleblowers, and those who were terminated without explanation. Many attributed their departure to prioritizing loyalty to the president over ethical obligations.
Read More
The current administration, under a president who disregards legal limits, is transforming the presidency into a position of authority that rejects the rule of law. This is evidenced by his threats of violence against those who uphold the Constitution. Federal agents are allegedly conducting unconstitutional raids, creating an environment of fear and undermining due process. The author believes the only appropriate response is impeachment, criminal prosecution, and the unwavering defense of the law, encouraging widespread resistance and support for those working to uphold American ideals.
Read More
Kelly to Hegseth: Pentagon investigation over ‘illegal orders’ video won’t ‘intimidate me’ is a situation that’s really got people talking, and for good reason. It all started with a video from Senator Mark Kelly, where he essentially reminded service members of their duty to uphold the law and not follow illegal orders. That’s a pretty straightforward message, right? But the reaction from some corners, particularly the Trump administration, has been anything but.
The response from the administration, with calls for Kelly’s arrest and even suggestions of execution, is what’s truly alarming. It’s like they’re trying to punish someone for simply stating the obvious – that soldiers aren’t supposed to obey orders that break the law.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court made a horrible mistake when it gave Trump absolute power. It’s hard to even call it a mistake, really. More like a deliberate dismantling of the checks and balances that have, until recently, defined American democracy. This wasn’t an accident; it was a carefully orchestrated maneuver, a long game played by a conservative movement that has, for decades, prioritized reshaping the judiciary. And the consequences are terrifyingly clear.
What’s really chilling is the Supreme Court’s rationale, as articulated by Chief Justice Roberts. He argued that a president must be able to “carry out his constitutional duties without undue caution” and take “bold and unhesitating action.”… Continue reading
Dozens of former US Department of Justice attorneys have detailed the politicization of federal law enforcement during Donald Trump’s second term. The attorneys reported directives to investigate Trump’s political opponents, drop investigations, and mass pardons, including those who participated in the January 6th Capitol riot. This politicization extended to executive orders targeting law firms and investigations with predetermined outcomes, and the use of pardons for political allies. Additionally, there have been efforts to relax gift-acceptance rules, and misuse of government resources for personal gain.
Read More
Trump re-pardons a Jan. 6 defendant to erase unrelated gun conviction, and it’s certainly a development that raises a lot of eyebrows. It’s hard not to notice the layers of complexity and potential implications that come with this action. We’re talking about a situation where a pardon was essentially doubled down on. The original pardon related to the defendant’s involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot. This is what you would expect. However, this re-pardon is aimed at wiping away a completely separate conviction – a firearms charge that stemmed from a different set of circumstances. It’s a bit like giving someone a “get out of jail free” card twice, even when the initial card should have been sufficient.… Continue reading
Judge Mark L. Wolf, a Reagan-appointed jurist, resigned from the federal judiciary due to concerns about Donald Trump’s use of the law for partisan purposes and the president’s assault on the rule of law. Wolf, who previously served in the Justice Department, felt compelled to speak out against the White House’s actions, which he views as an existential threat to democracy. He directly compared Trump’s actions to those of Nixon, emphasizing the severity of the current situation. Wolf hopes to act as a spokesperson for other judges who are unable to speak candidly about the current administration.
Read More
In a recent development, Judge Mark Wolf, a Reagan appointee, resigned to publicly criticize the Trump administration’s actions, citing an “assault on the rule of law.” Wolf accused Trump of using the law for partisan purposes, targeting political adversaries while protecting allies. This resignation follows rising tensions between the judiciary and the Trump administration, with other Reagan-appointed judges also voicing similar concerns. Wolf’s primary concerns include Trump’s dismantling of agencies investigating corruption and the increase in threats against judges.
Read More
**Judge permanently blocks deployment of National Guard to Portland, saying Trump exceeded his authority**
The news that a judge permanently blocked the deployment of the National Guard to Portland is a welcome development, a clear indication that a branch of government is actively scrutinizing and attempting to curtail the overreach of presidential power. This ruling, specifically citing that Trump exceeded his authority, is important and serves as a critical check and balance. The judge’s decision, based on the fact that Trump’s deployment was “untethered from the facts” and reality, should ideally be straightforward, and the fact that it is even a victory to be celebrated points to the erosion of basic legal principles in these times.… Continue reading
Kelly Slams Hegseth as “Totally Unqualified,” Calls Criticism “Ridiculous”
Mark Kelly’s blunt assessment of Pete Hegseth as “totally unqualified” really hits home, doesn’t it? The sheer audacity of the situation, the idea that someone like Hegseth, given his background, could be considered for a position where he would oversee military personnel, is what Kelly found so “ridiculous.” It’s hard to disagree. It seems like the whole thing is just absurd.
Kelly’s comments on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” were a clear indication of how many people feel. While acknowledging the importance of journalists, the Senator pointed out that Hegseth’s background, is not aligned with the requirements of such a high level role.… Continue reading
DOJ Staff Slam Trump and Bondi, Accuse Administration of Prioritizing Loyalty Over Constitution
Recent departures from the Justice Department have illuminated a troubling picture of the agency under the Trump administration, according to former employees. Farewell letters describe a department grappling with compromised ethics, undue pressure, and a toxic atmosphere, with some warning of lasting damage. These departures include those who refused to drop cases for political reasons, whistleblowers, and those who were terminated without explanation. Many attributed their departure to prioritizing loyalty to the president over ethical obligations.
Read More
Remove Trump from Office and Prosecute: Arguments and Calls to Action
The current administration, under a president who disregards legal limits, is transforming the presidency into a position of authority that rejects the rule of law. This is evidenced by his threats of violence against those who uphold the Constitution. Federal agents are allegedly conducting unconstitutional raids, creating an environment of fear and undermining due process. The author believes the only appropriate response is impeachment, criminal prosecution, and the unwavering defense of the law, encouraging widespread resistance and support for those working to uphold American ideals.
Read More
Kelly to Hegseth: Pentagon Probe Won’t Intimidate Senator Over ‘Illegal Orders’ Video
Kelly to Hegseth: Pentagon investigation over ‘illegal orders’ video won’t ‘intimidate me’ is a situation that’s really got people talking, and for good reason. It all started with a video from Senator Mark Kelly, where he essentially reminded service members of their duty to uphold the law and not follow illegal orders. That’s a pretty straightforward message, right? But the reaction from some corners, particularly the Trump administration, has been anything but.
The response from the administration, with calls for Kelly’s arrest and even suggestions of execution, is what’s truly alarming. It’s like they’re trying to punish someone for simply stating the obvious – that soldiers aren’t supposed to obey orders that break the law.… Continue reading
Supreme Court’s Trump Immunity Ruling: Not a Mistake, but a Threat to Democracy
The Supreme Court made a horrible mistake when it gave Trump absolute power. It’s hard to even call it a mistake, really. More like a deliberate dismantling of the checks and balances that have, until recently, defined American democracy. This wasn’t an accident; it was a carefully orchestrated maneuver, a long game played by a conservative movement that has, for decades, prioritized reshaping the judiciary. And the consequences are terrifyingly clear.
What’s really chilling is the Supreme Court’s rationale, as articulated by Chief Justice Roberts. He argued that a president must be able to “carry out his constitutional duties without undue caution” and take “bold and unhesitating action.”… Continue reading
Trump DOJ Corruption: Americans Enraged, Justice System Weaponized
Dozens of former US Department of Justice attorneys have detailed the politicization of federal law enforcement during Donald Trump’s second term. The attorneys reported directives to investigate Trump’s political opponents, drop investigations, and mass pardons, including those who participated in the January 6th Capitol riot. This politicization extended to executive orders targeting law firms and investigations with predetermined outcomes, and the use of pardons for political allies. Additionally, there have been efforts to relax gift-acceptance rules, and misuse of government resources for personal gain.
Read More
Trump Reprieves Jan. 6 Defendant Again, Erasing Unrelated Gun Conviction
Trump re-pardons a Jan. 6 defendant to erase unrelated gun conviction, and it’s certainly a development that raises a lot of eyebrows. It’s hard not to notice the layers of complexity and potential implications that come with this action. We’re talking about a situation where a pardon was essentially doubled down on. The original pardon related to the defendant’s involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot. This is what you would expect. However, this re-pardon is aimed at wiping away a completely separate conviction – a firearms charge that stemmed from a different set of circumstances. It’s a bit like giving someone a “get out of jail free” card twice, even when the initial card should have been sufficient.… Continue reading
Reagan-Appointed Judge Resigns, Condemns Trump’s Actions as Threat to Democracy
Judge Mark L. Wolf, a Reagan-appointed jurist, resigned from the federal judiciary due to concerns about Donald Trump’s use of the law for partisan purposes and the president’s assault on the rule of law. Wolf, who previously served in the Justice Department, felt compelled to speak out against the White House’s actions, which he views as an existential threat to democracy. He directly compared Trump’s actions to those of Nixon, emphasizing the severity of the current situation. Wolf hopes to act as a spokesperson for other judges who are unable to speak candidly about the current administration.
Read More
Reagan Judge Resigns Bench to Criticize Trump’s Rule of Law
In a recent development, Judge Mark Wolf, a Reagan appointee, resigned to publicly criticize the Trump administration’s actions, citing an “assault on the rule of law.” Wolf accused Trump of using the law for partisan purposes, targeting political adversaries while protecting allies. This resignation follows rising tensions between the judiciary and the Trump administration, with other Reagan-appointed judges also voicing similar concerns. Wolf’s primary concerns include Trump’s dismantling of agencies investigating corruption and the increase in threats against judges.
Read More
Judge Blocks Trump’s National Guard Deployment to Portland, Citing Overreach
**Judge permanently blocks deployment of National Guard to Portland, saying Trump exceeded his authority**
The news that a judge permanently blocked the deployment of the National Guard to Portland is a welcome development, a clear indication that a branch of government is actively scrutinizing and attempting to curtail the overreach of presidential power. This ruling, specifically citing that Trump exceeded his authority, is important and serves as a critical check and balance. The judge’s decision, based on the fact that Trump’s deployment was “untethered from the facts” and reality, should ideally be straightforward, and the fact that it is even a victory to be celebrated points to the erosion of basic legal principles in these times.… Continue reading