It appears that courts have repeatedly found that ICE has jailed people illegally, with instances numbering in the thousands – specifically, around 4,400 times. This suggests a significant and persistent issue with how Immigration and Customs Enforcement operates.
What’s particularly striking is that despite these numerous court rulings against them, these practices haven’t stopped. It raises a fundamental question about the effectiveness of judicial decisions when they are seemingly disregarded by the executive branch agency tasked with enforcement.
One might wonder about the human cost of these illegal detentions. How long were these individuals held against the law? What kind of suffering or abuse might they have endured during their unlawful imprisonment?… Continue reading
Britain’s High Court has ruled that the government’s decision to outlaw the protest group Palestine Action as a terrorist organization was unlawful, citing that the group’s activities did not meet the threshold for proscription. While judges found the ban disproportionate, it will remain in place pending a further hearing as the government prepares an appeal. The ruling suggests that the criminal law remains available to prosecute individuals for specific actions, regardless of the ban. Civil liberties groups and supporters of Palestine Action have hailed the decision as a victory for free speech and democratic rights.
Read More
Federal authorities have initiated a criminal investigation into two immigration officers for allegedly lying under oath regarding a shooting incident. This probe follows the dismissal of all charges against two Venezuelan men, Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna and Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who were initially accused of assaulting an ICE officer. Video evidence and new information revealed inconsistencies with sworn testimony, leading to the charges being dropped and prompting the joint investigation by ICE and the Justice Department. The officers involved are on administrative leave pending the outcome of this investigation, which could result in termination and criminal prosecution.
Read More
The Department of Justice appears to be encountering significant challenges in securing indictments against individuals perceived as opponents of the current administration, a situation that is notably unusual within the federal justice system. The recent failure to convince a grand jury to indict six members of Congress marks a stark example of these growing obstacles, highlighting an “uphill battle” for prosecutors seeking to reprimand those aligned against the administration’s agenda.
It’s quite rare for federal prosecutors to present their case to a grand jury and not secure an indictment. For context, in fiscal year 2016, the Department of Justice sought federal charges against nearly 70,000 felony defendants, and in a mere six instances did a grand jury refuse to indict.… Continue reading
A federal grand jury has declined to indict six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a video reminding military members of their duty to refuse illegal orders. This action was reportedly an effort by the Trump Justice Department, led by US attorney Jeanine Pirro, to charge the lawmakers with interfering with military loyalty and discipline. Lawmakers and legal observers have expressed alarm at the attempt to weaponize the Justice Department against political opponents, calling it an assault on the First Amendment and the rule of law.
Read More
Amidst a surge in measles cases, some detainees at the Dilley facility, which recently held a father and son released Sunday, have been quarantined, with assurances that all are receiving proper medical care. This comes as the article notes a dramatic increase in measles cases under the current administration, attributing it partly to a lack of seriousness regarding rising numbers and policies that may encourage future outbreaks. A significant outbreak in South Carolina exemplifies the severity of the current situation.
Read More
Judge in Minnesota Says ICE Has Violated Nearly 100 Court Orders
It’s pretty clear: a judge in Minnesota has called out ICE for a serious problem, and the numbers are alarming. We’re talking about nearly 100 court orders that ICE has simply disregarded. Think about that for a moment. These aren’t suggestions or friendly requests; these are court orders, the backbone of our legal system, and ICE is, according to this judge, failing to comply. The judge was clear too – “ICE is not a law unto itself.” It seems ICE is operating with a disregard for the legal process.
The judge’s tally, and it’s important to note this, was “hurriedly compiled.”… Continue reading
City prosecutors are stepping up, uniting to bring charges against federal agents, a move that signals a shift in the legal landscape. The core of this action lies in investigating reports of crimes allegedly committed by these agents, highlighting a breakdown of trust and cooperation, particularly with the federal government. This isn’t just about accusations; it’s about a refusal to accept inaction, an insistence on accountability.
Normally, the investigation of federal agents and the use of deadly force would fall to the FBI and the Department of Justice’s Office of Civil Rights. But the denial of any wrongdoing by federal officials, coupled with accusations against state leaders of obstructing immigration enforcement, has forced a change of course.… Continue reading
The second group, comprised of corporate leaders and business executives, chooses silence due to fear of retribution or the desire for tax cuts, evident in their financial support of Trump. Right-wing media outlets, acting as Trump’s propaganda arms, are driven by a combination of financial gain and genuine hatred of liberals, leading them to defend Trump while demonizing the opposition. Finally, the MAGA faithful encompasses a range of supporters, including soft supporters with diverse motivations who don’t necessarily view Trump as a savior.
Read More
During a House committee hearing, former special counsel Jack Smith defended his decisions to prosecute President Trump, including the decision to bring charges against him. Smith stated his investigations provided proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” of Trump’s criminal activity. Smith affirmed he would pursue the same course of action regardless of the president’s political affiliation, emphasizing that “no one should be above the law.” These investigations led to unprecedented indictments that were delayed due to Department of Justice policy preventing the prosecution of a sitting president.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker
ICE Officer Perjury Probe Raises Accountability Questions
Federal authorities have initiated a criminal investigation into two immigration officers for allegedly lying under oath regarding a shooting incident. This probe follows the dismissal of all charges against two Venezuelan men, Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna and Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who were initially accused of assaulting an ICE officer. Video evidence and new information revealed inconsistencies with sworn testimony, leading to the charges being dropped and prompting the joint investigation by ICE and the Justice Department. The officers involved are on administrative leave pending the outcome of this investigation, which could result in termination and criminal prosecution.
Read More