Trump Officials Accused of Bullying Tactics to Kill a Climate Measure
This story really hits a nerve, doesn’t it? It’s a stark reminder of the lengths some people will go to obstruct progress, especially when it comes to climate action. We’re talking about a situation where the Trump administration, during its tenure, allegedly employed some seriously aggressive tactics to kill a deal designed to curb pollution from cargo ships. The implications of this are vast, and frankly, a bit frightening. The fact that the story is based on unnamed diplomats speaking out of fear of retribution speaks volumes about the atmosphere created by these actions.… Continue reading
In a recent interview, actor Harrison Ford strongly criticized former President Donald Trump’s actions regarding climate change, calling his policies “ignorance, hubris, and purposeful subterfuge”. Ford expressed deep concern over Trump’s dismantling of environmental protections and his promotion of fossil fuels, citing these actions as potentially criminal. He also highlighted the increasingly visible consequences of climate change, such as the devastation caused by recent hurricanes and wildfires, attributing these disasters to the planet’s rising temperatures. Despite the challenges, Ford remains hopeful that Trump’s perspective will not prevail, emphasizing the need for global cooperation and innovation to combat climate change.
Read More
Financial Post offers newsletters to keep readers informed about Canada’s key industries and sectors. These newsletters provide valuable insights and updates on various economic areas within the country. Readers can stay informed by subscribing to these free email newsletters. This allows them to receive timely information on important developments.
Read More
E.P.A. Is Said to Draft a Plan to End Its Ability to Fight Climate Change. The news feels like a punch to the gut, a disheartening confirmation of something many have feared: a potential dismantling of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) capacity to address climate change. This potential move is not just a policy change; it’s a fundamental shift with potentially dire consequences.
E.P.A. Is Said to Draft a Plan to End Its Ability to Fight Climate Change. Some might argue, with a sort of twisted logic, that climate regulations harm human health through higher prices and limited consumer choice. This perspective, however, seems detached from the real-world impacts of inaction.… Continue reading
Amidst the debate on the Republican budget reconciliation package, Senator Mike Lee has reintroduced a proposal to sell off public lands, despite previous blocks from the Senate Parliamentarian. Critics like Senator Ron Wyden and the Sierra Club argue that this move, which could be voted on as early as Saturday, aims to benefit the wealthy at the expense of public lands. Although Lee’s amended proposal narrows the scope, reducing the acreage for sale, it is still facing strong opposition from Democrats, environmental groups, and even some Republicans who view it as a “poison pill.” The proposed legislation includes new fees for renewable energy projects and reduced royalty rates for fossil fuels.
Read More
H.R.3346, a bill proposing the abolishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), represents a drastic shift in environmental policy, potentially unraveling decades of environmental protections. The bill’s introduction, sponsored by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), signals a significant challenge to the EPA’s role in regulating various environmental aspects, ranging from air and water quality to toxic waste management. This radical proposal would effectively dismantle the central federal agency responsible for enforcing environmental standards across the nation.
The proposed elimination of the EPA raises profound concerns about the future of environmental regulation in the United States. The agency plays a crucial role in enforcing landmark legislation like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, setting standards that protect public health and the environment.… Continue reading
The Trump administration has initiated a widespread removal of climate crisis references from numerous federal government websites, including those of the Departments of Defense, State, and Transportation. This action eliminates climate change sections, policies, and funding, echoing a similar trend observed during his previous term. Critics argue this suppression of information hinders public understanding of the climate crisis, particularly amidst escalating extreme weather events. The administration, however, maintains its focus is on deregulation and boosting domestic energy production.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. Submissions can be made through a designated online portal. The publication welcomes information from all sources. This process allows for community involvement in investigative journalism and news reporting. Details on how to submit tips are available on the website.
Read More
President Biden issued an executive order permanently banning future offshore oil and gas leasing across 625 million acres of US ocean waters, citing environmental concerns and arguing the ban is unnecessary to meet national energy needs. This action, invoking the 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, is designed to be difficult for a future administration to reverse, requiring congressional action. While the oil industry and some Republicans strongly opposed the move, the administration maintains the ban will have little economic impact and enjoys bipartisan support from coastal communities and governors. The decision builds on prior presidential actions to protect coastal areas from offshore drilling.
Read More
In a move finalized just weeks before the change in presidential administrations, the Department of the Interior proposed a two-year ban on oil and gas leasing across 264,000 acres of Nevada’s Ruby Mountains. This follows a prior rejection of a similar proposal under the Trump administration due to overwhelming public opposition and geological surveys indicating minimal oil potential. The Biden administration cites preservation of the area’s recreational value and wildlife habitat as justification. The proposal now enters a 90-day public comment period under the incoming Trump administration, which could potentially challenge the ban.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker