Environmental Policy

EPA Plan to End Climate Change Fight: “Environmental Purging Agency”

E.P.A. Is Said to Draft a Plan to End Its Ability to Fight Climate Change. The news feels like a punch to the gut, a disheartening confirmation of something many have feared: a potential dismantling of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) capacity to address climate change. This potential move is not just a policy change; it’s a fundamental shift with potentially dire consequences.

E.P.A. Is Said to Draft a Plan to End Its Ability to Fight Climate Change. Some might argue, with a sort of twisted logic, that climate regulations harm human health through higher prices and limited consumer choice. This perspective, however, seems detached from the real-world impacts of inaction.… Continue reading

Mike Lee Attempts Public Land Sale in Senate Bill Ahead of Vote

Amidst the debate on the Republican budget reconciliation package, Senator Mike Lee has reintroduced a proposal to sell off public lands, despite previous blocks from the Senate Parliamentarian. Critics like Senator Ron Wyden and the Sierra Club argue that this move, which could be voted on as early as Saturday, aims to benefit the wealthy at the expense of public lands. Although Lee’s amended proposal narrows the scope, reducing the acreage for sale, it is still facing strong opposition from Democrats, environmental groups, and even some Republicans who view it as a “poison pill.” The proposed legislation includes new fees for renewable energy projects and reduced royalty rates for fossil fuels.

Read More

House Bill Seeks to Abolish the EPA

H.R.3346, a bill proposing the abolishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), represents a drastic shift in environmental policy, potentially unraveling decades of environmental protections. The bill’s introduction, sponsored by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), signals a significant challenge to the EPA’s role in regulating various environmental aspects, ranging from air and water quality to toxic waste management. This radical proposal would effectively dismantle the central federal agency responsible for enforcing environmental standards across the nation.

The proposed elimination of the EPA raises profound concerns about the future of environmental regulation in the United States. The agency plays a crucial role in enforcing landmark legislation like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, setting standards that protect public health and the environment.… Continue reading

Scientists Fear Worst as Trump Administration Erasures Climate Data

The Trump administration has initiated a widespread removal of climate crisis references from numerous federal government websites, including those of the Departments of Defense, State, and Transportation. This action eliminates climate change sections, policies, and funding, echoing a similar trend observed during his previous term. Critics argue this suppression of information hinders public understanding of the climate crisis, particularly amidst escalating extreme weather events. The administration, however, maintains its focus is on deregulation and boosting domestic energy production.

Read More

Biden Permanently Bans Offshore Drilling, Defying Trump Reversal

President Biden issued an executive order permanently banning future offshore oil and gas leasing across 625 million acres of US ocean waters, citing environmental concerns and arguing the ban is unnecessary to meet national energy needs. This action, invoking the 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, is designed to be difficult for a future administration to reverse, requiring congressional action. While the oil industry and some Republicans strongly opposed the move, the administration maintains the ban will have little economic impact and enjoys bipartisan support from coastal communities and governors. The decision builds on prior presidential actions to protect coastal areas from offshore drilling.

Read More

Biden Bans Nevada Oil and Gas Leases for 20 Years

In a move finalized just weeks before the change in presidential administrations, the Department of the Interior proposed a two-year ban on oil and gas leasing across 264,000 acres of Nevada’s Ruby Mountains. This follows a prior rejection of a similar proposal under the Trump administration due to overwhelming public opposition and geological surveys indicating minimal oil potential. The Biden administration cites preservation of the area’s recreational value and wildlife habitat as justification. The proposal now enters a 90-day public comment period under the incoming Trump administration, which could potentially challenge the ban.

Read More

Wyoming Governor’s Land Sale to Grand Teton Park: A Controversial Deal

Wyoming has sold a 1-square-mile parcel bordering Grand Teton National Park to the U.S. government for $100 million, a deal finalized after the governor approved the sale, preventing a potential developer sale. The federal government contributed $62.5 million, with private funding covering the remainder. This ecologically significant land, habitat to various wildlife, represents the last of four state-owned parcels added to the park over the past decade. The sale concluded after negotiations involving the Bureau of Land Management and concerns over development restrictions in southwestern Wyoming.

Read More

Trump’s Plan: Bribe Your Way to Pollute

President-elect Trump proposed a plan to expedite approvals and permits for any individual or company investing $1 billion or more in the U.S., including environmental approvals. This proposal, widely criticized as illegal by environmental groups and legal experts, would allow wealthy investors to circumvent existing regulations, such as the National Environmental Policy Act. Critics argue this plan prioritizes the interests of large corporations and fossil fuel donors over public health and environmental protection. The plan’s legality is questionable, and its implementation faces significant regulatory hurdles. The incoming administration’s choice for EPA head, Lee Zeldin, has minimal environmental policy experience but supports Trump’s deregulatory agenda.

Read More