Department of Justice

FBI Prioritizes Immigration, White-Collar Crime Enforcement Wanes

The FBI’s shifting priorities, driven by a Department of Justice directive, are raising serious concerns. A noticeable scaling back of investigations into white-collar crime is occurring, simultaneously with a marked increase in the agency’s focus on immigration enforcement. This reallocation of resources is leaving a significant gap in the prosecution of financial crimes, potentially emboldening perpetrators and creating a climate ripe for exploitation.

This change in approach seems to directly contradict the principles of a just and equitable system. While addressing immigration concerns is undoubtedly important, the de-prioritization of white-collar crime investigations appears to disproportionately benefit those who commit financial fraud and other serious offenses.… Continue reading

Schumer Holds DOJ Appointments Over Trump’s Qatari Jet Gift

Senator Schumer is demanding transparency regarding a controversial deal involving the gifting of a private jet to the Air Force, expressing concerns about its impact on an existing Boeing contract and the politicization of the Department of Justice. Trump’s attempts to justify the deal as precedent-setting are factually inaccurate, drawing criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans. While presented as “free,” the jet will necessitate costly modifications, ultimately burdening taxpayers with millions of dollars in expenses. Schumer vows to actively oppose the deal until full disclosure is provided.

Read More

Judge Grants DOJ Extension in Deportation Case After Scathing Rebuke

Following a scathing rebuke for insufficient responses, a federal judge granted the Department of Justice a one-week extension to answer questions regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The judge deemed the administration’s previous responses willful noncompliance and an attempt to obstruct discovery, rejecting claims that Abrego Garcia, deported despite court protections, is an MS-13 gang member. The Justice Department, citing various legal privileges, continues to resist facilitating Abrego Garcia’s return as ordered by the Supreme Court, despite the lack of substantiating evidence. This defiance, mirroring similar cases involving Venezuelan migrants, threatens a major constitutional conflict between the judiciary and executive branches.

Read More

Feds Leak Plan to Kill NYC Congestion Pricing: Incompetence or Intentional Sabotage?

An internal Department of Justice letter, mistakenly posted online, revealed significant doubts among federal attorneys regarding the legal basis for Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy’s attempt to revoke the MTA’s congestion pricing tolls. The letter highlighted flaws in the current legal strategy and suggested alternative, albeit weaker, arguments. Following the accidental release and subsequent removal of the document, the Department of Transportation spokesperson accused the Southern District of New York attorneys of incompetence and announced they would be removed from the case. The incident further escalated tensions between the Trump administration and the Southern District of New York, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal battle over the Manhattan tolls.

Read More

Trump’s Approval Ratings Plummet Amidst Widespread Criticism

Following the unlawful deportation of Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, the Supreme Court mandated his repatriation, an order echoed by U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis. Despite these rulings, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has failed to act, citing unsubstantiated claims of gang affiliation based on his tattoos. The DOJ’s response to subsequent inquiries was dismissive, refusing to answer questions and incorrectly identifying El Salvador while dismissing the court orders as a “false premise.” This inaction directly contradicts the Supreme Court’s directive to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States.

Read More

Trump Defies Supreme Court: Roberts’s Inaction Fuels Constitutional Crisis

Following a meeting between Donald Trump and Nayib Bukele, Trump falsely claimed a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling in his favor regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, misrepresenting the court’s decision and refusing compliance. This action raises serious questions about the Supreme Court’s potential response and the integrity of the Department of Justice, which has shown a pattern of prioritizing loyalty to Trump over adherence to the law. The article highlights concerns regarding the Chief Justice’s awareness of this situation and the potential implications for the nation’s future. Ultimately, the Chief Justice’s understanding of the DOJ’s actions is crucial to determining the next steps.

Read More

NYC Mayor Adams Corruption Case Dismissed With Prejudice

Federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams have been dropped with prejudice by Judge Dale Ho, meaning the case cannot be reinstated. This decision follows a request from the Department of Justice, supported by a court-appointed friend, citing concerns that the ongoing investigation hampered Adams’ governance and 2025 mayoral campaign. While the DOJ stated the dismissal wasn’t based on evidence strength, Judge Ho’s ruling acknowledged concerns about a potential “bargain” but ultimately lacked the authority to compel continued prosecution. Adams, who maintains his innocence, has apologized to New Yorkers.

Read More

Democrats Demand Musk Corruption Investigation

Leading Democrats have demanded a Department of Justice and Department of Transportation investigation into Elon Musk’s potential conflicts of interest. Their concerns center on Musk’s role as a special government employee, his involvement in a $2.4 billion FAA contract cancellation favoring his company Starlink, and the potential violation of conflict-of-interest statutes. The senators allege Musk is using his government position to benefit his private companies, citing SpaceX personnel working at the FAA and Starlink hardware shipments. This action follows broader concerns regarding alleged widespread corruption and conflicts of interest within the Trump administration.

Read More

DOJ to Review Prosecution of Election Conspiracy Theorist Tina Peters

The Department of Justice will review the state’s prosecution of Tina Peters, a former county clerk convicted of election system breaches, prompted by a federal court appeal. The review will assess whether the prosecution prioritized political motivations over justice, citing concerns about the severity of her sentence relative to the offenses. This action follows a recent pattern of Trump administration influence on prosecutions, although the DOJ cannot directly overturn Peters’ state-level conviction. The Department encourages prompt consideration of Peters’ appeal.

Read More