Deluzio and Crow have publicly stated their defiance following failed attempts to indict them. They contend that the Trump Administration and Department of Justice are weaponizing the legal system to suppress dissent and target political adversaries. Both individuals express outrage and resolve, asserting that such intimidation tactics will not silence them and that Americans are increasingly united against perceived corruption and abuse of power.
Read More
The Trump administration reportedly attempted to indict six Democratic lawmakers over a video encouraging military and intelligence personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The lawmakers, all with military or intelligence backgrounds, asserted that public servants have the right to defy illegal commands. This effort, led by a Trump appointee, is viewed as a continuation of the Justice Department targeting perceived political opponents, raising significant First Amendment and constitutional immunity concerns. Despite these challenges, and while some lawmakers faced separate disciplinary action, the attempt to secure indictments ultimately failed.
Read More
A watchdog group, the Democracy Defenders Fund, has accused the Department of Justice of “impermissibly” narrowing the scope of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The group alleges that despite millions of documents being released, none include communications from top Trump administration officials such as Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, or FBI Director Kash Patel. The Democracy Defenders Fund contends these officials have been central to the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files and their communications should be included, suggesting these documents may have been withheld or redacted. The DOJ, however, has dismissed these complaints as a “tired narrative,” stating they have complied with the law by releasing millions of pages and disclosing un-responsive items.
Read More
More than a dozen federal prosecutors in Minnesota have resigned in protest of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies. This exodus, triggered in part by the Department of Justice’s refusal to investigate the killings of U.S. citizens by immigration agents, has significantly depleted the office’s staff. The departing attorneys also raised concerns about being pressured to rush charges and the lack of consideration for the conduct of federal agents. This has led to a reduction in the experienced legal staff available to handle cases, with the office now relying on less experienced attorneys and facing an influx of wrongful detention cases.
Read More
Public access to thousands of Jeffrey Epstein investigation documents was temporarily removed by the Department of Justice due to redaction errors that may have inadvertently exposed victim-identifying information. This action followed requests from victims’ legal representatives and an internal review by the DOJ, which has since revised its protocols for handling such sensitive materials. The department is diligently reviewing the affected documents to ensure proper redactions before reposting them, while unredacted versions remain accessible to lawmakers.
Read More
Under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice has significantly reduced funding and training for law enforcement agencies investigating child sex crimes, including the cancellation of the 2025 National Law Enforcement Training on Child Exploitation. These cuts, enacted shortly after his re-election, hinder efforts to prosecute child predators and put vulnerable children at risk, according to sources. This lack of funding and training impacts investigators’ ability to keep up with the evolving tactics of child predators, including their use of AI and new platforms. Additionally, the suspension of annual grants and meetings with ICAC taskforces further restricts resources and collaborative efforts, creating significant challenges for those working in this sensitive area.
Read More
The Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, has declared it will not investigate the killing of Renee Good by ICE agent Jonathan Ross, citing the availability of video evidence and a lack of justification for such an investigation. Despite the DOJ’s refusal, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty have vowed to proceed with their own investigation, though they have been denied access to evidence collected by the Justice Department. The DOJ is, however, investigating Good’s widow and local officials, while also accusing them of obstructing ICE. This decision has spurred the resignation of numerous Justice Department attorneys, highlighting the controversy surrounding the administration’s actions.
Read More
The Department of Justice has stated that it will not investigate the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced there was “no basis” for a criminal civil rights investigation into the incident, which occurred on January 7th. The decision comes despite widespread protests and a national poll indicating over half of Americans believe the shooting was unjustified. While declining to investigate the shooting, the DOJ is reportedly moving to investigate Good’s widow.
Read More
Senator Murkowski has stated that if the Department of Justice investigates Chair Powell based on cost overruns, Congress should investigate the Department of Justice to protect the Federal Reserve’s independence. Senator Tillis is blocking all Federal Reserve nominees until the Justice Department ends its investigation into Powell and other Fed officials. Tillis believes the Department of Justice’s credibility is now in question and will oppose any Fed nominees, including for the upcoming Chair vacancy, until the matter is resolved. The Senate Banking Committee’s current Republican majority gives Tillis significant power to stall nominations.
Read More
The Department of Justice has broadened the definition of domestic terrorism, encompassing organized structures, networks, and actions related to radicalization, rioting, looting, and doxing of law enforcement, as well as the targeting of public officials. This shift will lead to federal charges in cases previously handled locally, signaling an escalation of legal repercussions. The administration has repeatedly used this broader definition to justify actions against individuals, exemplified by the handling of cases involving ICE agents, even when video evidence contradicted their claims. These actions have raised concerns about the potential for abuse and the suppression of dissent.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker
Trump Administration Won’t Investigate ICE Killing, Sparking Outrage
The Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, has declared it will not investigate the killing of Renee Good by ICE agent Jonathan Ross, citing the availability of video evidence and a lack of justification for such an investigation. Despite the DOJ’s refusal, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty have vowed to proceed with their own investigation, though they have been denied access to evidence collected by the Justice Department. The DOJ is, however, investigating Good’s widow and local officials, while also accusing them of obstructing ICE. This decision has spurred the resignation of numerous Justice Department attorneys, highlighting the controversy surrounding the administration’s actions.
Read More