The Trump Administration, following requests from Republican officials, plans to send observers to monitor upcoming elections in six counties across New Jersey and California. This decision, aimed at ensuring transparency and ballot security, has drawn criticism from Democratic leaders who view it as potential interference in key races. These elections are significant, with California’s Proposition 50 potentially impacting the balance of power in Congress and the New Jersey governor’s race drawing national attention. Democrats express concerns, citing the Trump Administration’s history of spreading false claims of voter fraud, and fear the monitoring effort is intended to suppress votes.
Read More
Reports have surfaced indicating that former President Trump is seeking $230 million in compensation from the Department of Justice for investigations conducted during the Biden administration. When questioned about the matter during a press conference, Trump appeared confused and struggled to answer the reporter’s questions. Despite his initial ignorance, he later alluded to the lawsuits and suggested the funds could go towards White House renovations. The situation raises ethical questions, particularly due to the presence of Trump loyalists within the Justice Department.
Read More
The Trump administration dismissed two federal prosecutors from the Eastern District of Virginia, Kristin Bird and Elizabeth Yusi, who reportedly opposed the criminal case against New York Attorney General Letitia James. This move follows a series of terminations within the office, including the removal of Erik Siebert, who also did not pursue cases against James or James Comey. This office has seen multiple departures, including the top national security official and the First Assistant U.S. Attorney, leaving uncertainty about representation at James’ upcoming arraignment. Ultimately, the Justice Department has declined to comment on the matter.
Read More
Garnett revealed that the employees had violated a court order outlining rules for counsel, with instructions for the Department of Justice to ensure the Attorney General was aware of and adhered to these guidelines. Mangione’s lawyers presented evidence of public statements from DOJ employees and White House officials they contended had prejudiced his right to a fair trial. Specifically, officials linked Mangione to unrelated acts of violence. One such instance was a social media post by a deputy director of the DOJ’s Office of Public Affairs, which was subsequently shared and deleted by the chief of staff and associate deputy attorney general.
Read More
According to Congressman Ro Khanna, only a minuscule portion of the documents recently released by the Department of Justice to the House Oversight Committee were actually new. Khanna stated that a mere 3% of the provided materials were previously unseen, representing less than 1% of the complete Epstein files. The congressman shared these details during an interview on The Weekend program. This limited release raises further questions about the government’s transparency regarding the Epstein investigation.
Read More
A former Department of Justice antitrust official, Roger Alford, has accused Attorney General Pam Bondi of allowing MAGA-aligned corporate lobbyists to influence antitrust enforcement. Alford claims that political appointees overruled career staff in a settlement regarding the Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s acquisition of Juniper Networks, undermining the rule of law. The core of Alford’s claim is that Bondi’s chief of staff and nominee for associate attorney general did not share her commitment to the rule of law, leading to a perversion of justice in the deal. This settlement is currently under review by a federal court in San Jose, and several Senate Democrats are calling for an investigation by the DOJ inspector general.
Read More
The Trump administration’s actions have severely depleted the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, with over 60% of its workforce gone since January due to firings and resignations. Despite the dwindling resources, the DOJ is actively seeking staff reassignments to address vacancies, particularly in areas related to education, employment, and voting. However, the division’s priorities have shifted to align with the administration’s agenda, focusing on issues such as DEI investigations, voter database accuracy, and perceived voting fraud, while seemingly stepping back from traditional civil rights protections. This loss of experienced litigators may hinder the DOJ’s ability to pursue its ideological lawfare efforts, which could potentially be viewed as a positive outcome.
Read More
Bodycam footage from January 6, 2021, shows Jared Wise, a former Jan. 6 defendant, berating police officers and yelling, “kill ’em.” Despite these actions, Wise is now working as a senior advisor for the Department of Justice under the Trump administration, which introduced the footage as an exhibit in Wise’s trial. Wise was not convicted due to a presidential order. This hiring decision, along with other actions like pardons and dismissals of cases, highlights the administration’s efforts to reshape the narrative of the Capitol riot, drawing criticism from those involved in the initial investigations.
Read More
Durbin demands recordings of Ghislaine Maxwell-Department of Justice talks, and that’s where we find ourselves. It’s a call for transparency, a demand that the inner workings of these discussions be laid bare. The core concern is the nature of the interview itself: why would the Deputy Attorney General be the one conducting it, and what was the true purpose behind this interaction with Ghislaine Maxwell? The usual protocol would have line prosecutors, those intimately familiar with the case’s details and the individuals involved, handling such a meeting. Durbin and others see this as a red flag.
The crux of the issue seems to revolve around the potential for a “corrupt bargain.”… Continue reading
A watchdog group founded by former Obama official Norm Eisen has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Department of Justice, seeking the disclosure of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. This request specifically targets any Epstein files that reference former President Donald Trump, citing reports that Trump is included in these files. The DDF is requesting any internal communications between DOJ officials regarding handling references to Trump in the Epstein case. This appeal follows growing controversy surrounding the Epstein case, including alleged attempts to protect Trump from the fallout.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood