Department of Justice

DOJ Won’t Investigate ICE Killing of Minneapolis Woman, Will Investigate Widow Instead

The Department of Justice has stated that it will not investigate the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced there was “no basis” for a criminal civil rights investigation into the incident, which occurred on January 7th. The decision comes despite widespread protests and a national poll indicating over half of Americans believe the shooting was unjustified. While declining to investigate the shooting, the DOJ is reportedly moving to investigate Good’s widow.

Read More

DHS Agents Reluctant to Deploy to Minneapolis Amidst Growing Backlash

Senator Murkowski has stated that if the Department of Justice investigates Chair Powell based on cost overruns, Congress should investigate the Department of Justice to protect the Federal Reserve’s independence. Senator Tillis is blocking all Federal Reserve nominees until the Justice Department ends its investigation into Powell and other Fed officials. Tillis believes the Department of Justice’s credibility is now in question and will oppose any Fed nominees, including for the upcoming Chair vacancy, until the matter is resolved. The Senate Banking Committee’s current Republican majority gives Tillis significant power to stall nominations.

Read More

We Are All “Terrorists” Now: How Political Labels Are Weaponized

The Department of Justice has broadened the definition of domestic terrorism, encompassing organized structures, networks, and actions related to radicalization, rioting, looting, and doxing of law enforcement, as well as the targeting of public officials. This shift will lead to federal charges in cases previously handled locally, signaling an escalation of legal repercussions. The administration has repeatedly used this broader definition to justify actions against individuals, exemplified by the handling of cases involving ICE agents, even when video evidence contradicted their claims. These actions have raised concerns about the potential for abuse and the suppression of dissent.

Read More

DOJ: Brown/MIT Shooter Planned Attack for Months, Showed No Remorse

According to information released by the U.S. Department of Justice, Claudio Neves Valente, the shooter in the Brown University and MIT professor killings, planned the attacks for years. In videos recovered by the FBI, Valente confessed to the murders, which included two Brown University students and MIT Professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro, but provided no specific motive. The recordings revealed that Valente had no intention of apologizing for his actions and explicitly addressed misinformation surrounding the attacks. Furthermore, Valente acknowledged being confronted by a witness and detailed his lack of a strong emotional connection to the United States or Portugal.

Read More

US Justice Department: Less Than 1% of Epstein Files Released, Sparking Outrage and Calls for Accountability

The Department of Justice has only released a small fraction of the Epstein files, as revealed in a recent court filing. Despite a federal law mandating release by December 19th, only about 12,285 documents have been published. While the department cites the protection of victims’ identities and the vast number of documents as reasons for delays, Democrats have intensified criticism, accusing the Trump administration of “lawlessness” and demanding the release of unredacted files. Several key figures are also mentioned in these files, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who is under investigation as well.

Read More

Epstein Files: Redactions Undone by Simple Copy-Paste, Not Hacks

Upon examination, documents released by the Department of Justice in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed that certain redactions were easily circumvented through basic techniques. These documents, specifically from a civil case against Epstein’s estate executors, contained allegations of Epstein’s associates facilitating child sexual abuse. One unredacted portion indicated payments exceeding $400,000 to young women, including a former Russian model. The Justice Department settled a civil sex-trafficking case against Epstein’s estate in 2022, and recently signed into law was the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but it is unclear if the redaction of certain materials complied with the law’s standards.

Read More

Maxwell’s DOJ Communication: Epstein Survivor Claims More Access Than Victims

Several news stories are generating significant attention. Bipartisan members of Congress plan to file inherent contempt charges against Pam Bondi in relation to the Epstein files. Simultaneously, a bipartisan backlash is mounting against Bondi and the Department of Justice over the release of these files. Other key headlines include concerns over rising healthcare costs for Obamacare recipients and an author defending a recent article that has been criticized.

Read More

DOJ Misses Epstein Files Deadline, Khanna Vows Obstruction Prosecution

As the deadline to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein passed, the Department of Justice announced it would not comply. Democratic Representative Ro Khanna vowed to prosecute any officials obstructing disclosure. This was after Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, requiring all relevant documents to be released within 30 days. Lawmakers, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are demanding full transparency, citing a potential cover-up.

Read More

Legislators: DOJ Violating Law by Not Fully Releasing Epstein Files

The Department of Justice partially released files related to Jeffrey Epstein, but faced criticism for not fulfilling the requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed by Congress. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that several hundred thousand documents would be released, with more to follow, but this partial release drew rebukes and threats of legal action. The law mandates the release of all Epstein-related documents within 30 days of its enactment, but the DOJ’s actions appear to go against the act’s language. Leading figures from both sides of the aisle expressed disappointment, emphasizing the need for complete transparency and accountability.

Read More

Epstein Files: DOJ Misses Deadline, Faces Scrutiny and Accusations of Cover-Up

The Department of Justice, according to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced it would not be releasing all files related to Jeffrey Epstein, despite a law signed by President Trump mandating their release. The initial release included several hundred thousand documents, with more expected in the coming weeks, while prioritizing the protection of victims. This decision comes amidst scrutiny of Trump’s relationship with Epstein, who he had previously called a “terrific guy” and is linked to other high-profile figures. There is concern that the Justice Department’s redaction process might impede the full transparency that victims are hoping for and that the law demands.

Read More