Elon Musk is funding Republican congressional candidates, signaling a thaw in tensions with Donald Trump and the Republican party. The world’s richest person and largest donor of the 2024 election cycle intends to continue donating through 2026. This comes after Musk reportedly paused efforts to create a new political party, the “America Party,” as he sought to maintain good relationships with prominent Republicans, including JD Vance, to whom he plans to give his backing in the 2028 election. Although Musk may be focused on his business ventures, he will continue to spend money to back candidates, despite the failed Trump experiment and shareholder disapproval.
Read More
White House Chief Calls Musk Drug User, VP ‘Conspiracy Theorist’: Let’s dive right in, shall we? The initial reaction seems to be a mix of “duh,” cynicism, and a dash of genuine surprise, all wrapped up in the political theater we’ve come to expect. It appears someone, let’s call her Susie, a former White House insider, has spilled some serious tea, and the contents are causing quite the stir. We’re talking about accusations, denials, and the ever-present shadow of political maneuvering.
The main takeaway here? Susie, in a recent interview, allegedly characterized Elon Musk as a drug user and the Vice President as a conspiracy theorist.… Continue reading
Scoop: Elon Musk diving into 2026 midterms for the GOP? It’s hardly a surprise, is it? We’re talking about the richest person on the planet, a real-life “super villain” in some people’s eyes, and someone who seems to be treating our country like his personal playground, similar to how he treated Twitter. The idea of him pouring resources into the 2026 midterms for the Republican party isn’t shocking; it’s almost expected.
This feels like it’s flirting with the line of what’s acceptable. We already have to deal with his network of satellites, his public persona and now his deep pockets. It’s difficult to avoid the sinking feeling that we’re watching a wealthy individual actively trying to buy influence in our political system.… Continue reading
The European Commission confirmed that X will be required to pay a €120 million fine. While the company has 90 days to respond and the option to challenge the decision in the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Commission plans to collect the funds. Despite the regulatory action, X has not yet issued an official statement, but the company’s owner, Elon Musk, has suggested retaliatory actions against the EU and individuals involved.
Read More
X, formerly Twitter, has prohibited the European Commission from advertising on its platform after being fined €120 million by the EU. The fine was issued due to the platform’s deceptive blue tick system, which the EU deemed insufficient in verifying users and potentially exposing them to scams. In response to the fine and the subsequent ad ban, X accused the EU of exploiting its advertising system, while Elon Musk expressed disapproval of the EU, leading to accusations of censorship from US officials.
Read More
In a recent turn of events, Elon Musk expressed strong criticism of the European Union, advocating for its abolishment following a $140 million fine imposed on his social media platform, X. The penalty was issued due to alleged violations of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), specifically regarding transparency requirements related to blue checkmarks, advertising databases, and data access for researchers. The DSA, designed to hold online platforms accountable for content moderation and user safety, has been a point of contention, with Musk’s remarks highlighting the growing tension between X and European regulators. The EU has previously warned X about its failure to combat dangerous content, leading to concerns about the platform’s compliance with the DSA’s provisions.
Read More
The European Union fined X, formerly known as Twitter, 120 million euros for violating the bloc’s Digital Services Act, marking the first non-compliance decision under the new regulations. The EU’s executive arm cited three transparency breaches, including deceptive blue checkmark practices, shortcomings in its ad database, and barriers to researchers accessing public data. Officials maintain the rules aim to protect European users and not target any specific company or jurisdiction, despite criticism from figures like Marco Rubio who view the fine as an attack on American tech.
Read More
In response to the European Commission’s fine of €120 million on X for transparency violations under the Digital Services Act, Elon Musk called for the European Union to be “liquidated.” Musk’s statement, made on the platform X, advocated for returning sovereignty to individual countries. This fine represents the first penalty issued under the EU’s content moderation law.
Read More
Here is a summary:
This article is based on information provided by a third party. CoinMarketCap does not generate the data or information presented within the article. Readers should be aware that the content is sourced externally and subject to the full terms and conditions applicable to the provider. Therefore, it’s crucial to consult the complete terms for a comprehensive understanding of data usage and limitations.
Read More
The EU has found X in violation of the Digital Services Act’s transparency obligations, citing the deceptive design of its blue checkmark, a lack of transparency in its advertising library, and a failure to provide data access for researchers. This marks the conclusion of one segment of the ongoing investigation, with other areas such as content moderation still under review. Unlike X, TikTok avoided a fine after agreeing to modify its service’s design following a similar probe. Companies that comply with EU rules can avoid fines; the DSA allows for penalties up to 6% of global annual turnover, potentially impacting X and its broader corporate structure.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood