Newly released government emails reveal that members of Elon Musk’s private security team were deputized as federal agents last year, despite some lacking required training and law enforcement experience. This decision, approved by the U.S. Marshals Service at the White House’s request, allowed Musk’s guards to carry weapons in federal buildings during his tenure as a senior adviser to President Trump. The Marshals Service granted waivers for these guards, who did not meet standard eligibility requirements, a move that occurred amidst ongoing scrutiny of the agency’s deputization practices.
Read More
The recent news regarding Elon Musk’s alleged participation in a call involving Donald Trump and Narendra Modi, concerning Iran, has certainly sparked a whirlwind of reactions and, frankly, a considerable amount of head-scratching. The very notion of a private company executive being present on a government call discussing matters of war and international relations raises immediate and pointed questions about transparency and the blurring lines between the public and private sectors. It begs the question: what exactly is the business of someone running a private enterprise, no matter how influential, on a call of such national security import?
The presence of a figure like Musk, known for his… shall we say, *enthusiastic* and often outlandish pronouncements, on a call with two heads of state discussing a geopolitical flashpoint like Iran, feels less like strategic diplomacy and more like an unsolicited, perhaps even intrusive, insertion into critical governmental discussions.… Continue reading
Despite initial enthusiasm from Republican leadership, a recent Vanderbilt University survey indicates that a majority of Nashville residents now disapprove of Elon Musk’s proposed Music City Loop project. Public opposition significantly increases when Musk’s involvement is explicitly mentioned, with concerns amplified by The Boring Company’s past track record of violations at other tunnel projects. While city council members have formally opposed the loop, the state government has granted permission for construction under state highways, potentially limiting local oversight on safety and environmental matters. The Boring Company is also actively seeking tunnel development opportunities in other U.S. cities.
Read More
The idea of a call between former President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with Elon Musk joining in, to discuss the Iran war is certainly a scenario that sparks a lot of conversation and, frankly, a bit of bewilderment. It’s the kind of gathering that prompts questions about who really holds sway in global affairs.
When you hear about a powerful private citizen like Elon Musk participating in high-level discussions about international conflict, it’s natural to wonder about the historical context. Has this kind of direct involvement from influential individuals in government policy always been the norm, with past figures simply being more discreet?… Continue reading
The recent dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Elon Musk’s X Corp, formerly known as Twitter, against advertisers accused of an illegal boycott has certainly stirred the pot. X Corp had claimed that these advertisers were acting against their own economic interests in a coordinated conspiracy that violated U.S. antitrust law. It’s a rather audacious claim, to say the least, especially considering the platform’s own trajectory and some rather vocal pronouncements from its owner.
One can’t help but notice a recurring theme here, can they? For those who champion the ideals of a free market, it seems remarkably inconvenient when that very market doesn’t behave exactly as they envision.… Continue reading
A judge has ruled that Elon Musk must face a lawsuit alleging he unlawfully seized excessive power as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The plaintiffs claim Musk overstepped his authority by taking drastic actions like eliminating agencies and implementing mass firings without Senate confirmation, actions they argue went beyond the scope of President Trump’s executive orders. The court rejected the government’s defense that Musk held no formal office, stating that the alleged unlawful creation of an office and seizure of power only strengthens the need for scrutiny under the Appointments Clause, as evading checks and balances is not permissible.
Read More
French prosecutors are reportedly looking into Elon Musk, with a significant suspicion that he may have deliberately fanned the flames around the controversy involving X’s AI chatbot, Grok, specifically its ability to generate explicit imagery. The core of this investigation seems to hinge on the idea that this manufactured outrage was strategically employed to artificially inflate the perceived value of X, his social media platform formerly known as Twitter.
The situation became particularly alarming when reports surfaced detailing the AI’s output. The watchdog group, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, flagged that in a mere eleven days, Grok had generated an estimated three million sexualized images.… Continue reading
During a lunch for Kennedy Center board members, former President Trump stated that a past president, whom he “actually likes,” expressed a wish to have taken the actions Trump is currently taking regarding Iran. When pressed for details, Trump declined to identify the former president, citing a desire to avoid causing them trouble. He described the individual as a smart person who likes him, suggesting that person might even be proud of the revealed sentiment.
Read More
French prosecutors are reportedly investigating allegations that Elon Musk may have encouraged the spread of deepfake content on X, formerly known as Twitter, with the suspected motive of artificially inflating the platform’s value. This development surfaces amidst ongoing discussions about the nature of user engagement on X and its impact on advertiser confidence and the platform’s overall valuation.
At the heart of the suspicion lies the argument that a surge in user traffic, even if driven by morally questionable content like deepfakes, could be presented to investors as organic growth. The notion is that if more people are accessing and interacting with the platform, regardless of the specific reason, it can be spun as increased engagement and a growing user base, thereby bolstering the platform’s perceived worth.… Continue reading
A California jury has determined that Elon Musk misled Twitter shareholders regarding his $44 billion acquisition, potentially awarding up to $2.6 billion in damages. The class action lawsuit contended that Musk’s public statements and tweets, particularly concerning bot counts, were materially false and misleading, causing Twitter’s stock to slide. Investors argued this was a scheme to pressure the company into selling at a lower price, influenced by declines in Tesla’s stock value. Musk’s team is expected to appeal the verdict, though the jury did not find a specific scheme to defraud.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood