American Authoritarianism

Yale Historian: Trump’s Policies Risking World War III

Yale historian Greg Grandin posits that President Trump’s foreign policy is destabilizing the international order established after World War II. Grandin highlights the administration’s embrace of the Monroe Doctrine, suggesting a return to a world divided into spheres of influence, particularly in Latin America. Evidence includes military actions and political interference in the region, including military build-up in the Caribbean. Grandin warns that this shift toward a more aggressive, sphere-of-influence approach increases the risk of global conflict and “brinkmanship” similar to what was seen leading up to World War II.

Read More

General Says Military Would Attack “Designated Terrorist Organizations” Within U.S. Borders

In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, General Gregory Guillot, commander of U.S. Northern Command, stated he would execute orders to attack designated terrorist organizations within the U.S. if he had no concerns about the lawfulness of the order. This revelation comes amid reports of the military conducting extrajudicial killings of alleged “narco-terrorists” in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, raising concerns about the legal justification for such actions. The White House and Justice Department have refused to rule out summary executions of Americans, with the Justice Department announcing arrests of a “far-left, anti-government, domestic terror cell” and a directive from the President to target U.S. progressive groups. The administration’s rhetoric, coupled with the executive order to root out domestic terrorist organizations, raises concerns about the potential for military action within U.S. borders and the suppression of dissent.

Read More

US Actions Echoing 1930s Concerns Amidst Political Polarization

British MPs expressed serious concerns about the US’s national security strategy, criticizing its use of “extreme rightwing tropes” reminiscent of the 1930s and its potential interference in European democracies. The House of Commons specifically scrutinized the strategy’s language, which described Europe as facing “civilisational erasure” and vowed to support “patriotic European parties.” While some ministers acknowledged areas of agreement with the US, others, including the Liberal Democrats, explicitly condemned the document’s ideology, with some describing it as rooted in “racist, white supremacist ideology”.

Read More

Sen. Murphy: Trump’s Rhetoric Fuels Violence, Critics Say

Sen. Murphy’s assertion that Trump is engaged in a “dizzying campaign to increase violence” in the US cuts right to the heart of a deeply concerning reality. The comments paint a picture of a political climate where inflammatory rhetoric, veiled threats, and the constant stoking of division have become the norm. This isn’t just about harsh words; it’s about the potential consequences of those words, the real-world impact they have on a society already grappling with deep-seated tensions.

The idea that some are actively trying to provoke the masses to benefit from economic chaos and social unrest is a chilling thought.… Continue reading

US Resembles Putin’s Russia: Growing Authoritarianism Concerns

The author, drawing from their experiences studying Russia, observes concerning parallels between Putin’s Russia and the current state of the United States. They highlight how Russia, through policies, marginalized certain groups and enriched the elite, a characteristic of a fascist regime. This marginalization manifested in the removal of certain groups from public spaces and the prioritization of superficial consumerism over basic human needs. The author fears that the US is headed down a similar path, mirroring the social stratification and inequities observed in Putin’s Russia.

Read More

Trump’s “New Normal”: Silencing Dissent and Redefining Legality

The New Normal: Trump Decides Which Beliefs Are ‘Legal’: When dissent becomes an “indicator,” the First Amendment stops being a right and starts being a risk.

It’s a chilling prospect: a government actively seeking out and investigating its own citizens based on their beliefs. This isn’t the premise of a dystopian novel; it’s the reality unfolding under a directive that, frankly, sounds like something out of a satirical newspaper. National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7) orders the FBI and other agencies to target individuals and groups based on a list of “indicators” – markers of potential domestic terrorism. These indicators, however, aren’t about violent acts.… Continue reading

Report Warns of Rapid U.S. Authoritarian Shift: Reaction and Skepticism

CIVICUS, an international network advocating for stronger civil liberties, has downgraded the U.S.’s civic freedoms assessment from “narrowed” to “obstructed.” This decision follows a report highlighting a “rapid authoritarian shift” in the U.S., citing actions by the Trump administration that undermine democratic institutions, target protesters, and restrict press freedom. Specific concerns include the deployment of federal troops to cities, the targeting of pro-Palestinian activists, and the increased criticism of media outlets leading to censorship and restrictions on access. This assessment places the U.S. in the same category as other nations also experiencing a decline in civil liberties, signaling a broader global trend.

Read More

Trump’s Actions: Accelerating Decline of American Democracy

Donald Trump’s behavior has steadily worsened, exceeding expectations of his “grotesquerie” to feed an “outrage addiction.” His mental and physical states have noticeably deteriorated, leading to corruption, incompetence, policy illiteracy, extremism, authoritarianism, and even treason. Trump’s actions consistently undermine democratic institutions and align with dictatorial regimes, demonstrating a desire to become a dictator himself. His actions are aimed at destroying everything everywhere, all the time.

Read More

Trump’s Thanksgiving: Darkest So Far, Critics Say

The article recounts a historical parallel to contemporary political anxieties, drawing a comparison between Donald Trump’s actions and those of John Adams during the late 1790s. Both leaders utilized fear-mongering and war rhetoric, such as the XYZ Affair, to suppress dissent and consolidate power, even attempting to jail their political opponents. Jefferson and his allies, however, countered Adams’ authoritarian tendencies through state-level resistance, pamphlets, and unwavering defense of democratic principles. This historical struggle highlights the power of truth-tellers, solidarity, and political leadership in overcoming threats to democracy, offering a hopeful perspective on current events.

Read More