A resurfaced video clip shows Donald Trump’s FBI nominee, Kash Patel, threatening retribution against media figures deemed complicit in the alleged rigging of the 2020 presidential election. Patel, a former federal prosecutor and Trump administration official, vows to pursue legal action against these individuals. This statement, made during a December 2023 interview, has gone viral, sparking significant debate and concern. Reactions range from alarm among critics to celebratory approval from some Trump supporters.
Read More
Following the dismissal of the federal case against Donald Trump regarding his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, Attorney General Merrick Garland faced sharp criticism from left-leaning figures. The case was dropped due to the Department of Justice’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents, a decision that special counsel Jack Smith supported. Critics argued that Garland’s perceived delays, including the timing of Smith’s appointment, contributed to Trump’s 2024 electoral victory and allowed him to avoid accountability. While the dismissal was without prejudice, allowing for future prosecution, the move sparked intense debate regarding Garland’s handling of the investigation and its broader implications.
Read More
Despite Donald Trump’s claim of an “unprecedented mandate,” his victory was narrow, with a popular vote margin smaller than Hillary Clinton’s 2016 margin and falling short of a majority. His Electoral College win, while significant, was also less substantial than previous victories by Obama and Bush. Furthermore, Republican control of Congress is tenuous, potentially hindering his agenda. Therefore, the assertion of a powerful mandate is unsubstantiated by the election results.
Read More
Federal prosecutors dismissed the two criminal cases against Donald Trump, citing Justice Department policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president. This decision, spurred by Trump’s election victory, effectively ends the years-long legal battles initiated by Special Counsel Jack Smith. While the cases against Trump’s co-defendants may continue, the dismissal highlights Trump’s successful strategy of leveraging his presidential campaign to avoid prosecution. The decision was met with celebratory statements from Trump’s team, who cited the “political weaponization” of the justice system.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dropped all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump regarding mishandling classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This decision, citing the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against indicting a sitting president, comes despite the gravity of the alleged crimes. Conservative judicial rulings, including a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, significantly impacted the case’s dismissal. The DOJ’s policy, established during Watergate, prioritizes a president’s ability to perform their duties unimpeded by legal proceedings, ultimately preventing further prosecution. Smith’s team plans to resign before Trump’s inauguration.
Read More
Trump’s plan to dismiss Jack Smith’s team and launch a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into the 2020 election appears to be a thinly veiled attempt at retribution. This action, if carried out, would represent a profound misuse of government resources and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. The 2020 election has already been extensively investigated and litigated; numerous court cases have rejected claims of widespread fraud. Reactivating this issue solely to target political opponents suggests a prioritization of personal vendettas over the impartial administration of justice.
Trump’s proposed action raises significant concerns about the potential for political interference in the DOJ.… Continue reading
Despite significant Muslim support for Donald Trump during the election, driven by opposition to the Biden administration’s Middle East policies, disappointment has arisen among these voters over several of his cabinet appointments. This dissatisfaction is particularly focused on the Secretary of State pick and other key positions. Furthermore, Trump’s nomination of Mike Huckabee as ambassador to Israel, given Huckabee’s pro-Israel stance, has added to this concern. Muslim voters believe their support was instrumental in key swing states, including Michigan.
Read More
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) recently asked her followers on Instagram why they had voted for her and for the re-election of Donald Trump. This prompted a flurry of responses, with many users pointing to the economy and the situation in Gaza as key factors influencing their decisions.
The economy was a major concern for many users, who felt that the current administration was not doing enough to address their financial needs. There was a sense that the country was headed in the wrong direction, and that a change was needed. Many users believed that Trump, despite his flaws, was better equipped to handle the economy than his opponent.… Continue reading
Despite projections of a landslide victory, Donald Trump’s win was closer than anticipated, securing only a two-point margin over Vice President Kamala Harris in the popular vote. While this outcome is unfavorable for Democrats, it falls short of a complete repudiation of their party. The blame game within the Democratic Party is unproductive and obscures the larger challenges facing the country. We must move beyond finger-pointing and focus on developing strategies to block Trump’s agenda, particularly his plans for mass deportations, as signaled by his initial appointments to key positions.
Read More
Despite the recent election of Donald Trump, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has stated unequivocally that she will not drop the criminal case against 18 individuals, including former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who were indicted for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results in Arizona. Mayes has assured the public that she will not be intimidated by potential threats from Trump’s legal team and is committed to holding accountable those who engaged in actions that undermine democracy. The case, which involves allegations of conspiracy to use fake electors, serves as a reminder of the ongoing efforts to address the events of the 2020 election and ensure that such attempts to subvert the democratic process are not repeated.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood