During a recent rally-style speech, former President Trump addressed the 2022 FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, focusing on the alleged search of First Lady Melania Trump’s personal items. Trump criticized the raid as “illegal and disgusting,” claiming agents went through his wife’s belongings. This commentary came amid an ongoing investigation into Trump’s handling of classified documents and his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Trump also brought up the compensation claims against the federal government, proposing initially to give the awarded compensation to charity and then deciding against it.
Read More
During a phone call with Georgia’s then-Speaker of the House David Ralston, Donald Trump falsely claimed to have won the state by a significant margin and alleged widespread voter fraud. Ralston later recounted this call to investigators, but the audio recording of the conversation has only recently been made public. Despite the revelation of Trump’s false claims and his previous attempts to overturn the election, the dismissal of the case and the possibility of his return to office in 2024 suggest that he may avoid legal consequences for his actions. This situation highlights a perceived inequality in the application of justice, where power and political connections appear to shield individuals from legal accountability.
Read More
NYT: “Who’s Gonna Stop You?” Listen to Trump Call Pressing Georgia Speaker to Overturn 2020 Election Results is a chilling reminder of the lengths to which a former president was willing to go to cling to power. The article, and the underlying phone call it highlights, paints a clear picture of an individual actively attempting to subvert the democratic process. The phrase “Who’s gonna stop you?” uttered by Trump, encapsulates the arrogance and brazenness of his actions. It’s a statement that reflects a complete disregard for the rule of law and the established norms of American governance.
The fact that this phone call occurred, and that it involved pressuring a state official to overturn election results, is not just a political misstep; it’s a direct assault on the foundations of democracy.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith testified before lawmakers, asserting that Donald Trump’s actions were the foundation for the criminal indictments against him regarding the January 6th insurrection and classified documents. Smith emphasized that the charges stemmed from Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and his retention of highly classified documents after leaving office. Smith also defended obtaining phone records of Republican lawmakers, explaining it was necessary due to Trump’s calls to them during the Capitol attack. Democrats praised Smith’s preparedness, while Republicans, who summoned Smith, criticized the investigation as a “political witch hunt.”
Read More
During a closed-door hearing with the House Judiciary Committee, former special counsel Jack Smith stated his team found evidence proving Donald Trump’s “criminal scheme” to overturn the 2020 election results, as well as repeated attempts to obstruct justice regarding classified documents. Smith emphasized that Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after leaving office, storing them in inappropriate locations. Smith’s investigations led to two indictments against Trump, which were later dismissed after Trump won re-election and faced intense scrutiny from Republicans. Smith maintained that his decisions to charge Trump were based on Trump’s actions and were guided by principles of following the law without fear or favor.
Read More
According to portions of his opening statement obtained by the Associated Press, former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith informed lawmakers during a closed-door interview that his team found proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump criminally conspired to overturn the 2020 election results. He also stated the team had amassed “powerful evidence” that Trump broke the law by retaining classified documents and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them. Smith emphasized that his decisions were made without regard to Trump’s political affiliations or candidacy, and that he would prosecute a former president based on the same facts regardless of their political party. The private deposition was part of a Republican investigation into Smith’s probes.
Read More
In a closed-door interview, Special Counsel Jack Smith asserted his team found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Donald Trump’s criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results and amassed powerful evidence of obstruction related to classified documents. Smith stated his decisions were made without regard to Trump’s political affiliations or candidacy, and he would have pursued the same course regardless of party. The private deposition before the House Judiciary Committee provided the first opportunity for lawmakers to question Smith regarding the investigations that led to criminal charges against Trump, which were later abandoned due to his reelection.
Read More
AP News reports that a preliminary hearing was held in Wisconsin for three individuals linked to Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign, facing felony forgery charges related to a fake elector scheme. Despite challenges to the charges, the case has moved forward while other cases in states like Michigan and Georgia have stalled. The defendants, including attorneys Jim Troupis and Kenneth Chesebro, and aide Mike Roman, are accused of defrauding Republican electors who cast ballots for Trump in 2020. The hearing determined whether enough evidence exists to proceed with the charges, which stem from the submission of fraudulent paperwork to then-Vice President Mike Pence, falsely claiming Trump had won the state.
Read More
During a Christmas reception, former President Donald Trump alleged the 2020 election was rigged by Democrats and claimed to possess substantial evidence to prove it. He asserted that the evidence would be revealed “in truckloads,” implying a vast amount of proof of election fraud. Trump also stated he would have won California if the election had been legitimate, further highlighting his allegations of widespread voter interference. While making these claims, Trump also diverted to other topics, including comments about a woman in the crowd and a story about a snake bite.
Read More
Tina Peters, the former Mesa County clerk, is currently serving a nine-year prison sentence for crimes related to the 2020 election. She was found guilty of multiple counts including attempting to influence a public servant, conspiracy, and official misconduct for her role in allowing unauthorized access to voting machine data. Despite efforts from Donald Trump, including public pressure campaigns and threats of intervention, Peters remains incarcerated. The Justice Department has initiated a review of Peters’ case, and could potentially seek her transfer or early release.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood