Special Counsel Jack Smith asserted that Donald Trump engaged in criminal activity. Smith’s investigation revealed that Trump was not seeking truthful information regarding the 2020 election results, and Smith’s office did not engage in any spying activities. Legal experts analyzed Smith’s testimony and his ongoing cases against Trump, with many noting Smith’s composed demeanor. Discussions surrounding Trump’s potential use of military force were also addressed, specifically concerning Greenland.
Read More
In his first public testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, former Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his decision to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump. Smith stated that he stood by his decisions, asserting that the investigation revealed proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Trump’s criminal activity. He elaborated on the charges, mentioning Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and the illegal retention of classified documents, including sensitive national security information stored in insecure locations. Smith emphasized his commitment to the rule of law, indicating that he would prosecute a former president based on the same facts today and that no one should be above the law.
Read More
President Trump is seeking a court order to block the Justice Department from releasing the second volume of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concerning the 2020 election and classified documents. The motion argues that the release would expose sensitive grand jury materials and privileged information. The first volume focused on election obstruction, while the unreleased second volume focuses on the handling of classified documents. Trump’s motion cites previous rulings that dismissed charges against him, and claims Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional.
Read More
Former special counsel Jack Smith is set to testify publicly before the House Judiciary Committee next week, following a closed-door deposition in December regarding his investigations into Donald Trump. This public hearing was requested by Smith before the initial deposition, which focused on Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the mishandling of classified documents. During the closed-door deposition, Smith stated he could prove Trump’s “criminal scheme” beyond a reasonable doubt and that Trump was “the most culpable” in the election interference case. The upcoming hearing marks a significant development in the ongoing legal scrutiny of the former president.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith, overseeing investigations into Donald Trump, testified in a closed-door hearing, maintaining his decision to prosecute Trump regardless of political affiliation. Next week’s public hearing anticipates Republican attempts to discredit Smith, accusing him of bias. Democrats are expected to focus on the evidence gathered against Trump. Smith has expressed a desire to publicly share the election investigation’s findings but is currently restricted by the Department of Justice.
Read More
The article details the story of Thomas Webster, a former police officer who was present at the January 6th Capitol riot. Webster, swayed by Donald Trump’s rhetoric and conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, drove to Washington, D.C. where he assaulted a police officer. Following his conviction, Webster was sentenced to prison, but was later pardoned by Trump. Despite the pardon, and now living in Mississippi, Webster still believes the election was stolen. The article concludes by highlighting Webster’s continued struggles with the events of that day and the difficulty in reconciling his actions with his self-perception as a patriot.
Read More
According to a released transcript from a congressional deposition, former special counsel Jack Smith confirmed he never communicated with President Joe Biden regarding his investigations into Donald Trump. Smith defended the charges against Trump, emphasizing the potential for “catastrophic” consequences if election interference goes unpunished. During the testimony, Smith asserted he operated independently, without interference from top justice department officials, and maintained that his actions were not politically motivated. Smith also addressed concerns over the collection of phone data, clarifying that only call details, not their contents, were obtained to investigate Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Read More
Jack Smith, in the course of his investigations, has seemingly revealed a pivotal truth about Donald Trump and the 2020 election. The core of the matter centers on the fact that Trump, according to Smith’s findings, privately acknowledged to others that he lost the election, a stark contrast to his persistent public claims of widespread fraud and a stolen victory. This dichotomy, the divergence between his private admissions and public pronouncements, paints a revealing picture.
The revelation that Trump admitted defeat privately, while publicly maintaining a narrative of election theft, speaks volumes about his motivations. It suggests a calculated strategy, a deliberate effort to manipulate public perception for his own ends.… Continue reading
According to released testimony, former special counsel Jack Smith believed Donald Trump was “most culpable” for the January 6 riot and would have been convicted. Smith’s investigation, which relied heavily on Republican witnesses, concluded that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election, inciting the violence at the Capitol. Smith asserted that Trump’s actions, including pressuring officials to alter election results and refusing to condemn the rioters, caused and exploited the events of that day. Despite the DOJ’s efforts, Trump’s 2024 election victory ended the criminal case.
Read More
The House Judiciary Committee released a full transcript and video of Jack Smith’s closed-door deposition, which detailed his reasons for indicting Donald Trump. Smith testified that there was significant evidence proving Trump’s involvement in a “criminal scheme” to overturn the 2020 election and repeated attempts to obstruct justice. During the deposition, Smith emphasized that Trump’s false claims were not protected by the First Amendment and that the former president knew the claims were untrue. Smith also addressed Trump’s attacks on Justice Department employees and his commitment to conducting a nonpartisan investigation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood