Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco has initiated an “unprecedented” investigation, seizing over 650,000 ballots from the November election to examine allegations of fraudulent vote counting. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has sharply criticized the probe, stating it lacks factual basis and that evidence overwhelmingly supports the integrity of past elections. Bianco claims his investigation, prompted by a citizens’ group alleging significant vote inflation, aims to either confirm or refute the accuracy of the election results, while Bonta’s office expresses concern over the seizure’s scope and the Sheriff’s department’s lack of election expertise.
Read More
President Donald Trump labeled a PBS White House correspondent a “rotten reporter” after she questioned his claims of election fraud, referencing the seizure of election records in Arizona. The Arizona Attorney General confirmed the state’s election records were provided for an “unserious” probe based on conspiracy theories, reiterating that extensive investigations found no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election. This incident is part of a pattern where Trump has frequently insulted and belittled journalists, particularly women reporters, when challenged on contentious issues, often resorting to personal attacks and deflecting direct questions.
Read More
President Trump’s actions surrounding the upcoming White House governors dinner and his obsession with the 2020 election results suggest a plan to “steal” future Republican victories. This includes potentially pardoning figures who could corroborate debunked election fraud claims and advocating for the “nationalization” of elections by Republican control in key areas. A recently passed House bill, though unlikely to become law, aims to enable voter suppression by tightening identification rules and allowing the Department of Homeland Security to seize voter rolls. If the November midterm election results are close, the scenario could become dire, with attempts to delegitimize the outcomes and potentially prevent the seating of newly elected members, echoing past efforts to overturn election results.
Read More
It’s rather telling, isn’t it, when a prominent political figure, like Kristi Noem, visits a state like Arizona with a clear agenda, and then struggles to produce even a single concrete example of the very election fraud they so vociferously claim exists. The very purpose of such a visit, often framed around concerns of election integrity, suggests an expectation that the visitor would come armed with evidence, or at least a credible understanding of specific instances. Yet, when pressed, or perhaps more accurately, when asked to provide substance to the claims, there appears to be a distinct lack of verifiable cases.… Continue reading
The current political discourse surrounding election integrity, particularly as voiced by the House Speaker, raises significant concerns about the stability of democratic processes. The Speaker’s apparent embrace of calls to “take over” elections and his assertion that Democratic wins appear “fraudulent” suggest a willingness to entertain extraordinary measures that could undermine established electoral norms. This stance is particularly troubling given the lack of concrete evidence supporting widespread election fraud, as demonstrated by numerous court cases that have dismissed such claims. The notion that Republican-run states inherently conduct elections more effectively than Democratic-run states, as suggested by the Speaker, is not only unsubstantiated but also divisive, implying a partisan bias in the very systems meant to be impartial.… Continue reading
Omar, Dems warn midterms may be ‘rigged’ after Bondi demands MN voter rolls is a topic that’s currently sparking intense debate and concern, especially as the midterms approach. There are clear anxieties being expressed about the potential for election interference, with prominent voices raising flags. The core of this worry seems to stem from a perceived pattern of actions and statements that suggest a concerted effort to undermine the integrity of the voting process.
One of the central threads in this discussion involves the demand for voter rolls, specifically the request from Pam Bondi, which has raised many questions. This demand, coupled with anxieties about the security of election equipment software, fuels the suspicion that something is amiss.… Continue reading
Former special counsel Jack Smith stated that Donald Trump was the “most culpable and most responsible person” in the January 6th Capitol riot, emphasizing that the attack wouldn’t have occurred without him. During a closed-door deposition released by the House Judiciary Committee, Smith defended his investigations, rejecting claims of political motivation, and asserted that evidence, including testimony from Trump allies, strongly supported the charges against him. Smith highlighted Trump’s actions leading up to the riot, including spreading false claims of election fraud and inciting supporters to march to the Capitol, as well as his reluctance to stop the violence once it began. Smith also defended the acquisition of phone records of Republican lawmakers who communicated with Trump on January 6th as a crucial part of the investigation.
Read More
Jack Smith, in the course of his investigations, has seemingly revealed a pivotal truth about Donald Trump and the 2020 election. The core of the matter centers on the fact that Trump, according to Smith’s findings, privately acknowledged to others that he lost the election, a stark contrast to his persistent public claims of widespread fraud and a stolen victory. This dichotomy, the divergence between his private admissions and public pronouncements, paints a revealing picture.
The revelation that Trump admitted defeat privately, while publicly maintaining a narrative of election theft, speaks volumes about his motivations. It suggests a calculated strategy, a deliberate effort to manipulate public perception for his own ends.… Continue reading
Former Colorado elections clerk Tina Peters is petitioning the state appeals court to recognize Donald Trump’s pardon of her state convictions as valid, citing a precedent from the Whiskey Rebellion. Peters’ lawyers argue the pardon removes the court’s jurisdiction and requests her release from prison. The Colorado Attorney General’s office, defending the conviction, has been given until January 8 to respond. The court previously denied Peters’ federal court bid for release.
Read More
In a recent Truth Social post, former President Trump expressed frustration with the Justice Department’s continued involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case. He urged the DOJ to cease releasing information about the deceased sex offender and instead focus on alleged election fraud. Trump also demanded the release of names of Democrats connected to Epstein, asserting that they were the primary individuals associated with him. This social media post followed the DOJ’s announcement of discovering over a million more documents related to Epstein, and failing to meet the deadline mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood