President Trump has continued his pattern of questioning election results, even in seemingly straightforward races. Following a L.A. mayoral runoff where Republican Spencer Pratt initially led but was overtaken by Democrat Nithya Raman as mail-in ballots were counted, Trump claimed the outcome was impossible and indicative of a “3rd World Nation.” This aligns with his past baseless accusations of fraud in the 2020 election and his continued attempts to erode public faith in the electoral process. Despite legislative efforts and executive orders aimed at altering election processes being met with legal challenges and expert condemnation, Trump’s strategy appears focused on sowing chaos by promoting claims of fraudulent results, a tactic that foreshadows his potential reaction to future election outcomes.
Read More
Vice President JD Vance has echoed concerns from Donald Trump and other MAGA figures regarding the Los Angeles mayoral primary. Vance stated that it appears “pretty shady” that Republican candidate Spencer Pratt was overtaken by Democrat Nithya Raman as mail-in ballots, historically favored by Democrats, were counted. The assertion is that the lengthy counting process, including the late arrival of ballots, seems to have engineered a Democrat-versus-Democrat runoff, raising questions about the election’s integrity.
Read More
Election fraud is a documented occurrence annually, and California’s lax voter registration policies, coupled with universal vote-by-mail, create an environment ripe for such activity. Millions of ballots are mailed out, and dirty voter rolls mean that deceased individuals, movers, and felons may receive them. An investigation is underway to identify widespread conspiracies, with charges anticipated in the coming months for suspicious ballot collection activities.
Read More
President Trump ended an interview with “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker after she challenged his unsubstantiated claims of election rigging in California. Despite Welker pointing out that ballot counting is a lengthy process, Trump insisted officials were “cheating” and accused the press of dishonesty. He stated he had “had enough” and walked off the set, asserting that a country cannot be great with a dishonest press. Reports indicate that a misreading of voting data in the Los Angeles mayoral race fueled these false narratives.
Read More
President Donald Trump abruptly ended an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker after clashing over his false claims about the 2020 election and his push for an “anti-weaponization fund” to reward those prosecuted under the Biden administration, including January 6 rioters. Trump revived calls for Congress to pass significant funding for this fund, arguing that individuals had been “destroyed” by prosecutions. Despite reports that the fund was not moving forward and faced significant congressional resistance, Trump maintained his support during the interview, even as the conversation devolved into personal attacks and threats of military action against Iran. Ultimately, the interview concluded with Trump exiting, labeling the network “one-sided” and “crooked.”
Read More
President Trump abruptly ended an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker after clashing over his false claims about the 2020 election and a proposed “anti-weaponization fund.” This fund, intended to reward those prosecuted under the Biden administration, including January 6 rioters, faced significant backlash and was declared by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as “not moving forward.” Despite this, Trump continued to advocate for the fund during the interview, also discussing his stance on Iran and the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago before storming out. The proposed fund had also encountered strong resistance in Congress, with Republicans expressing outrage and working to prevent its implementation.
Read More
The claim that a significant amount of evidence exists proving the 2020 election was stolen, while simultaneously admitting an inability to provide a definitive answer, presents a perplexing paradox. It suggests a situation where considerable information is perceived to be present, yet its evidentiary strength in a formal or conclusive sense remains elusive. This dichotomy raises substantial questions about the nature of the “evidence” and the standards by which it is being assessed.
The assertion of a “ton of evidence” without the capacity to offer a “definitive answer” implies a disconnect between what is being perceived as proof and what can legally or factually substantiate a claim of widespread election fraud.… Continue reading
It’s a curious and perhaps unsettling observation: a significant portion of voters believe the upcoming midterm elections might be “stolen,” yet there’s a remarkable lack of consensus on what that actually means. This sentiment, highlighted in recent polling, points to a deep-seated distrust in the electoral process, a distrust that seems to have taken root and spread, particularly in the years since Donald Trump’s rise in politics.
This erosion of faith isn’t happening in a vacuum. It’s a complex phenomenon fueled by a variety of accusations, anxieties, and differing interpretations of what constitutes a compromised election. For some, the belief that elections are “stolen” stems from a feeling that their vote has been effectively nullified, even before it’s cast.… Continue reading
FBI Director Kash Patel has claimed he possesses evidence to support President Trump’s assertions of a rigged 2020 election and hinted at its release this week. These statements emerge amidst allegations of Patel’s misconduct, which he vehemently denies and intends to counter with a defamation lawsuit. Meanwhile, Michigan officials are resisting DOJ efforts to seize ballots, accusing the administration of attempting to undermine electoral integrity. Patel, who insists he is performing his duties effectively, remains a key figure in the Trump administration’s law and order initiatives.
Read More
A Wisconsin man has been convicted of election fraud and identity theft for illegally requesting absentee ballots for prominent local officials. Jurors found Harry Wait guilty of two misdemeanor election fraud charges and one felony identity theft charge. Wait admitted to the actions, stating he aimed to expose vulnerabilities in the state’s voter registration system, a stance that has drawn both criticism and praise. His conviction follows a similar case where another individual also claimed to be testing election system integrity.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood