Trump’s repeated assertions about election fraud, coupled with Elon Musk’s increasing influence over technology and information, have fueled speculation about a potential connection between the two regarding the 2024 election. The idea that Musk possesses knowledge of or even manipulated “those vote counting computers” is a recurring theme in this discussion.
The notion that Musk could have quietly influenced the election outcome is unsettling. This possibility raises serious concerns about the integrity of the electoral process and the potential for manipulation of voting systems. The lack of transparent oversight regarding access to and control of critical election infrastructure only amplifies these concerns.… Continue reading
Following the North Carolina Supreme Court election, defeated Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin launched numerous legal challenges attempting to overturn the results, which showed his opponent, Justice Allison Riggs, winning by 734 votes. Griffin’s lawsuits seek to invalidate over 60,000 legally cast ballots, prompting the state Supreme Court’s Republican majority to block certification of Riggs’ victory. Despite a lack of evidence of widespread fraud, the court’s concurring opinions suggest a willingness to nullify votes to secure Griffin’s win, raising concerns about partisan bias and undermining democratic processes. The case’s path now includes appeals to federal courts, with the final outcome potentially resting on a tie in the state Supreme Court, highlighting a critical threat to North Carolina’s democracy.
Read More
President Trump’s assertion that Elon Musk’s expertise in Pennsylvania voting machines contributed to his 2024 election win has sparked calls for an investigation. While Trump didn’t explicitly allege manipulation, his comments fueled speculation of election rigging among his critics. Representative Daniel Goldman (D-NY) has publicly demanded an inquiry into the matter. Although Pennsylvania uses secure voting systems, a software malfunction during the election and an unverified report alleging vote tampering have further complicated the situation.
Read More
At a recent rally, President-elect Trump credited Elon Musk’s purported expertise in Pennsylvania’s voting systems for his landslide victory in the state. This statement, widely circulated online, prompted accusations from Trump critics of election rigging and spurred speculation about potential voter fraud. The claims have drawn sharp rebukes from Democrats, including a sitting congresswoman, who allege a confession to criminal activity. Newsweek has reached out to both the Trump transition team and Elon Musk for comment.
Read More
During her Senate confirmation hearing, Pam Bondi, Donald Trump’s nominee for Attorney General, repeatedly avoided stating that Trump lost the 2020 election, despite acknowledging Joe Biden’s presidency. She deflected questions regarding evidence of election fraud and her potential handling of investigations into Trump’s associates, including Jack Smith and Liz Cheney. Bondi emphasized her commitment to the Constitution and non-partisan justice, but her responses raised concerns about her independence from Trump’s influence. Her confirmation could lead to a Justice Department significantly shaped by Trump’s legal team and allies.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. Contributions may lead to impactful investigative journalism. All tips are treated with confidentiality. Contact information is readily available on the website.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that sufficient evidence existed to convict President-elect Donald Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, had he not been re-elected in 2024. The Department of Justice report details Trump’s alleged efforts, including spreading false claims of election fraud and inciting violence. Smith’s investigation faced significant challenges, including Trump’s use of social media to influence witnesses and legal proceedings. However, the DOJ’s policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president precluded further action.
Read More
Newly unsealed court filings reveal that Donald Trump knowingly propagated false claims of voter fraud and engaged in criminal activity to overturn the 2020 election results. Prosecutors presented evidence showing Trump’s pre-election planning to declare victory prematurely and his post-election efforts to sow chaos and undermine the vote count, even while dismissing advisors’ warnings about the falsity of his claims. The filing details Trump’s interactions with key figures like Mike Pence, highlighting his disregard for legal challenges and contrary statements from officials within his own party. This evidence aims to demonstrate that Trump’s actions were undertaken in a private capacity, not as presidential duties, strengthening the case against him.
Read More
For a limited time, readers can subscribe to the Standard Digital package at a 40% discount, reducing the annual cost from $540 to $319. This offer, valid until February 27, 2025, provides access to the Financial Times’ in-depth and reliable news coverage. Subscribers will gain the tools to form well-informed opinions based on trusted journalism. Don’t miss this opportunity to build robust perspectives.
Read More
Venezuela’s Maduro was recently sworn into office, yet the legitimacy of his victory remains deeply questionable. The lack of credible evidence supporting his claim to have won the election is glaring, a fact seemingly overshadowed by the unwavering support he receives from the Venezuelan military. This military backing, in itself, speaks volumes about the nature of the regime and its disregard for democratic processes. It highlights a stark reality: in certain contexts, brute force and control of the armed forces trump any semblance of electoral integrity.
This situation isn’t new; it’s been the established order in Venezuela for over a decade, a chilling testament to the sustained erosion of democratic institutions.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker