Oklahoma’s new high school U.S. history standards mandate instruction on supposed “discrepancies” in the 2020 election, including claims about ballot counting halts and mail-in voting security risks. These standards, championed by State Superintendent Ryan Walters, were hastily approved despite objections from some Republicans and educators who criticized the process and content. Critics argue the standards promote false narratives about election fraud rather than fostering critical thinking, potentially eroding public trust. Although some within the Republican party have defended the standards’ content, a lawsuit challenges their rushed approval process, potentially delaying implementation.
Read More
Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, convicted on seven counts including felonies related to unauthorized access of voting equipment, is the subject of a federal intervention attempt spearheaded by President Trump. Trump, calling Peters a political prisoner, urged the Department of Justice to secure her release, echoing similar calls from Rep. Lauren Boebert. While a federal magistrate judge indicated a preference to return the case to state court due to unexhausted state remedies, the Colorado Attorney General’s office affirmed its commitment to upholding the conviction. Peters’ claims of election fraud remain unsubstantiated, and state audits have confirmed the integrity of Colorado’s 2020 and 2024 elections.
Read More
Former President Trump accused major pollsters, including The New York Times, ABC News/Washington Post, and Fox News, of “election fraud,” citing recent polls showing his approval rating below 50 percent. He claims these polls are intentionally negative and aimed at discrediting him, referencing past instances where polls underestimated his electoral success. Trump’s statement escalates his long-standing attacks on polls he deems unfavorable, further fueling his criticisms of mainstream media. This follows polls showing his approval rating at historic lows for a president at this point in their term, particularly concerning his handling of specific policy issues.
Read More
Smartmatic is seeking to hold Mike Lindell in civil contempt for failing to pay over $50,000 in sanctions stemming from a frivolous counterclaim in a defamation suit. Lindell, citing $70 million in debt and IRS garnishment, claims he is unable to pay, stating he currently lives on $1,000 a week due to ongoing legal battles. Judge Carl Nichols will review Lindell’s financial documents before ruling on the contempt motion. These legal issues are part of multiple defamation lawsuits against Lindell, alleging he falsely linked Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems to election fraud to boost MyPillow sales.
Read More
A North Carolina Court of Appeals ruling, decided along party lines, favors Republican Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin, despite his loss to Democrat Allison Riggs. This decision challenges over 65,000 votes, disproportionately affecting young and Black voters, potentially overturning the election results. While 60,000 challenged votes were upheld, thousands more remain contested, jeopardizing the integrity of the election. The outcome could establish a Republican supermajority on the state Supreme Court and severely undermine voter confidence.
Read More
A Delaware judge has ruled that Newsmax defamed Dominion Voting Systems, a significant victory for the voting machine company in its ongoing legal battle against media outlets that spread false claims about its role in the 2020 election. This decision sets the stage for a jury trial scheduled for late April in Wilmington, Delaware, where Dominion will seek to recover $1.6 billion in damages.
The judge’s ruling is a clear indication that the court finds merit in Dominion’s claims of defamation. This is a substantial development, given the widespread dissemination of false information about Dominion’s alleged role in election fraud. The potential financial consequences for Newsmax are considerable, with the damages sought representing a significant portion of the company’s estimated value.… Continue reading
In March 2025, a video surfaced showing President Trump stating, “They rigged the election, and I became president,” during a press conference with FIFA President Infantino. The authenticity of the video is confirmed, but the specific election referenced—either 2020 or 2024—remains unclear. The statement was made during a press conference announcing a White House task force for the 2026 World Cup. The remark spread rapidly across various social media platforms.
Read More
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan has held Mike Lindell in contempt of court for his failure to provide crucial documents in the Smartmatic defamation case. This decision comes after Lindell repeatedly failed to comply with court orders demanding the production of specific data and financial records. The requested materials include analytics data from his company’s website and financial records detailing Lindell’s financial status for 2022 and 2023. This lack of compliance demonstrates a blatant disregard for the legal process, raising serious questions about Lindell’s commitment to a fair and transparent legal proceeding.
The judge’s order explicitly states that if Lindell continues to refuse to comply, Smartmatic is free to pursue further legal action to secure the necessary documents.… Continue reading
The Department of Justice will review the state’s prosecution of Tina Peters, a former county clerk convicted of election system breaches, prompted by a federal court appeal. The review will assess whether the prosecution prioritized political motivations over justice, citing concerns about the severity of her sentence relative to the offenses. This action follows a recent pattern of Trump administration influence on prosecutions, although the DOJ cannot directly overturn Peters’ state-level conviction. The Department encourages prompt consideration of Peters’ appeal.
Read More
Rudy Giuliani has settled the $148 million defamation case brought against him by two Fulton County election workers, Ruby Freeman and Wandrea Moss. This significant legal battle stemmed from Giuliani’s false claims about election fraud during the 2020 presidential election, claims he made with unwavering conviction despite knowing their falsity. The settlement’s specifics remain somewhat unclear, sparking considerable speculation about the source of the funds used to satisfy the judgment. While some sources suggest Giuliani possessed sufficient assets, including property, to cover the settlement, others question how a man who once publicly claimed a lack of funds could suddenly meet such a substantial financial obligation.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood