The Independent is committed to covering crucial stories like reproductive rights, climate change, and Big Tech, providing on-the-ground reporting and in-depth investigations. This work, including documentaries and financial analyses, helps readers distinguish facts from rhetoric. To continue this crucial reporting, the publication relies on donations to send journalists to the field and speak with all parties involved. Uniquely, The Independent offers its content without paywalls, believing that quality journalism should be accessible to all.
Read More
The story of the former Auburn University instructor suing the school, claiming she was fired over a Facebook post about Charlie Kirk, is a complex one, touching upon free speech, political ideologies, and the often-fraught atmosphere of higher education. Let’s break down this situation.
The central issue is the Facebook post itself. The instructor, after Charlie Kirk’s death, penned a post expressing a lack of sympathy for him and used strong language to describe him. The post included phrases like, “I do not mourn oppressors… I don’t give a damn about evil racist, fascist, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, mediocre, white men…” This post, the instructor claims, led to her firing, which she is now challenging through a lawsuit, arguing a violation of her First Amendment rights.… Continue reading
A woman, identified as Jane Doe, has filed lawsuits against Bank of America and Bank of New York Mellon, claiming the institutions knowingly facilitated Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation through financial services. Doe is seeking unspecified damages and is represented by law firms that previously secured settlements with Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan over similar allegations. Both banks have issued statements indicating they would contest the lawsuit. This legal action follows the ongoing investigation into Epstein’s case, which gained renewed attention following his death in jail and has prompted inquiries from the House Oversight Committee.
Read More
A federal judge dismissed Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group regarding Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us,” ruling the lyrics were opinion within the context of a rap battle. Judge Jeannette A. Vargas stated that the song’s accusations, though serious, would not be perceived as factual by a reasonable listener due to the heated and hyperbolic nature of the feud. The lawsuit, filed in January, alleged the track, which explicitly branded Drake as a pedophile, contained false and defamatory allegations, but the court sided with UMG, leading Drake’s legal team to announce plans to appeal the decision. The song, recognized for its success, was the culmination of a rap battle that included escalating personal insults.
Read More
A Los Angeles jury has found Johnson & Johnson liable in a case alleging its talc products caused the mesothelioma death of Mae Moore, awarding her family $966 million. The verdict includes $16 million in compensatory damages and $950 million in punitive damages, though the latter may be reduced on appeal. J&J plans to appeal the verdict, disputing the validity of the evidence presented and maintaining its products are safe. This recent verdict adds to the thousands of lawsuits against the company regarding its talc products, although J&J has had mixed results, including some wins, in similar trials.
Read More
Elon Musk and X have reached a settlement with four former Twitter executives who alleged they were owed $128 million in severance pay following Musk’s acquisition of the company in 2022. The executives, including the former CEO, claimed Musk falsely accused them of misconduct to avoid paying the promised severance. While the terms of the settlement remain undisclosed, this agreement follows a similar settlement with rank-and-file employees over unpaid severance. These legal battles are a part of a larger set of challenges Musk has faced since acquiring and restructuring the social media platform.
Read More
Kentucky has filed a lawsuit against Roblox, alleging the platform exposes children to violent and sexual content, including simulations of violence like the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The complaint accuses Roblox of prioritizing profit over child safety, claiming the platform knowingly facilitates exploitation and abuse through its in-game currency, Robux. Examples cited include games with simulated sexual activity and graphic violence. Roblox responded by stating the lawsuit is based on outdated information and welcomes a discussion on safety features, while also asserting a commitment to online safety and collaborative efforts.
Read More
A 69-year-old truck driver is suing Mark Sanchez and Fox Corporation in Indiana state court following a fight. The lawsuit alleges Sanchez instigated the fight, resulting in severe injuries to the truck driver, who also stabbed Sanchez. The incident reportedly stemmed from a dispute over parking, and Sanchez is currently facing criminal charges. Fox Sports declined to comment, and the lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages and attorney’s fees.
Read More
Illinois has filed a lawsuit to prevent the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard troops in Chicago, citing concerns of federal overreach and infringement on the state’s sovereignty. The lawsuit argues that the deployment is unconstitutional and will cause irreparable harm to the state’s social fabric, community relations, and economy. This legal action mirrors arguments made in an Oregon federal court’s temporary block of the Trump administration’s actions in Portland. The state seeks a court order declaring the deployment unlawful.
Read More
Newsom to sue over Trump sending California National Guard to Oregon: This is a big deal, and it’s pretty clear why. It looks like Governor Newsom is gearing up for a legal showdown over the former president’s move to deploy the California National Guard to Oregon. It’s a bold step, and it’s getting a lot of attention, understandably.
Newsom to sue over Trump sending California National Guard to Oregon: The core of the issue seems to be about who gets to call the shots with the National Guard. When the Guard is under state control, the governor has the authority. But when the President federalizes them, that authority shifts.… Continue reading