By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian forces conducted a series of overnight strikes on July 18, targeting Russian logistics centers, an oil depot in Noginsk, and a Wildberries warehouse in Elektrostal, all located deep within Russian territory and hundreds of kilometers from the front lines. These strikes, which also included attacks on vessels in the Azov and Black Seas, are part of Ukraine’s intensified long-range campaign aimed at disrupting Russian military capabilities and energy infrastructure. The attacks on oil facilities, in particular, aim to pressure the Kremlin by exacerbating a domestic fuel supply crisis.
Read the original article here
It appears that Ukraine has significantly escalated its drone offensive, targeting key Russian infrastructure far beyond the immediate front lines. Reports indicate that two Russian logistics centers and an oil depot were struck overnight, a development confirmed by both President Volodymyr Zelensky and the General Staff. This coordinated strike represents a notable shift in Ukraine’s approach, demonstrating a capability to reach deep into Russian territory and impact its war-making potential.
President Zelensky himself highlighted the success of these operations, stating that “our long-range sanctions worked across three areas on Russian territory, as well as on our temporarily occupied land and at sea.” This suggests a multi-pronged strategy where drone attacks are seen as a crucial component of broader efforts to degrade Russia’s ability to sustain its military operations, particularly concerning the supply of sensitive components.
The targeted logistics centers are specifically identified as facilities used by Russian forces to procure and distribute sanctioned materials essential for drone manufacturing and navigation equipment. One of these centers is located in the Moscow oblast, reportedly over 500 kilometers from the front lines, while the other is situated in Tambov oblast, even further afield at approximately 700 kilometers. The distance involved underscores the advanced reach of these Ukrainian drone attacks.
There’s been some discussion surrounding the specifics of the Tambov incident, with reports suggesting that deaths there were attributed to drones equipped with fragmentation warheads. However, a counterpoint has emerged, with observations of air defense systems firing 30mm explosive fragmentation rounds at the facility. This raises the possibility of friendly fire contributing to the damage and casualties, adding a layer of complexity to the reported events. Such internal issues within Russia’s defensive capabilities could be a significant development.
The sentiment surrounding these strikes is understandably strong. For many, this represents a significant and positive turn of events, with an exclamatory “HOT! Don’t stop, Ukraine! Amazing news :)” capturing the widespread enthusiasm for these successful operations. The phrase “🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦 Fuck Vladimir Putin” also conveys the strong anti-war and pro-Ukrainian sentiment that these developments are generating.
The idea of a tit-for-tat exchange is also evident in the commentary, with one user framing it as “Quid pro quo Putin muthafuka!!” followed by a simple, yet impactful, exchange: “russia: we’re having a war, ukraine: *starts destroying capital*, russia: wait no.” This highlights the perceived shift in the nature of the conflict, with Ukraine now actively striking at the heart of Russia’s perceived security.
However, not all interpretations of the “logistics centers” are uniformly accepted. One perspective suggests that the term might be an oversimplification, arguing that these were “two warehouses, in which specifically only civilian goods are stored.” The analogy drawn is to Iran striking Amazon warehouses in the US and publicizing it as a blow against enemy logistics, implying a potential exaggeration of the military significance.
Further refining the account of the Tambov strike, some suggest that only the Moscow logistics center was directly hit by a drone, with the Tambov facility suffering damage due to “AA friendly fire.” This assertion is supported by references to available video evidence. Such claims, if substantiated, would paint a picture of internal disarray and miscalculation within Russia’s air defense operations.
The notion of internal dissent and assistance to Ukraine is also being floated. One comment posits that “Russian military and other people close to them are also sick and tired of this senseless BS and are actively helping Ukraine with intel more than ever.” This raises the intriguing question of “when will Putler crack and give up,” hinting at a potential internal pressure on the Russian leadership to end the conflict.
The combination of perceived successful Ukrainian strikes and reported instances of Russian friendly fire has led to a rather darkly humorous observation: “Between that factory and the UFO scene from Moscow a little while back, Russian friendly fire is really putting in a show for the military footage Oscars.” This remark, while lighthearted, underscores the growing narrative of Russian military blunders and internal weaknesses being exposed on the international stage. The overall picture is one of a bold Ukrainian offensive pushing beyond traditional battlefronts, met with a complex mix of confirmed successes and reported operational mishaps within the Russian defense apparatus.