By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The World Cup showcased a stark contrast between the celebratory spirit of ordinary people and the “random acts of cruelty” enacted by the US government. While fans celebrated differences, the US government engaged in actions like banning referees and overriding rules, highlighting a growing disconnect between Americans and their nation’s global image. This reality has led many, particularly in Canada, to differentiate between individual Americans and the actions of their government, recognizing that the country’s systems are in a state of collapse, leading to a global rejection of American systems and a perception of the US as a threatening and unpredictable force.
Read the original article here
It seems that Donald Trump’s involvement has cast a long shadow over both the World Cup and America’s standing, leading to a sentiment that everything he touches turns to rot. This “mierdas touch,” as it’s been described, has unfortunately marred the experience, even to the point where the Belgian team’s celebration after a strong performance was seen by some as a mocking of his dance moves, a moment captured with a “chef’s kiss” by observers. The narrative suggests that his presence, or the attention he draws, has a peculiar effect, potentially riling up opponents and creating a sense of injustice for the teams involved, as the US team reportedly felt after their match against Belgium.
This negative influence is so profound that people like Trump are seen as figures to be avoided like the plague. His impact on the World Cup knockout match, for instance, is viewed as having transformed the US players into “villains of the tournament overnight,” despite their lifelong dedication. The feeling is that he “hung a moral asterisk on their biggest game,” leaving the players looking deflated and understandably so, as they were not seeking this added burden.
The idea of ICE potentially intervening after the US team’s elimination further highlights the perceived negative association with Trump, with his “FIFA (Fucking Idiot From America) Award” being seen as a futile gesture that ultimately achieved nothing. It’s as if anything Trump becomes associated with transforms into a complete and total disaster. The anticipation of him presenting the trophy, alongside FIFA’s president Infantino, is described as an “awkward” and uncomfortable prospect, underscoring a broader feeling of unease around his public appearances.
It’s almost uncanny how a single individual can have such a cursed, negative effect on everything they engage with. From renovations to public statements, the impression is of a pervasive, unwelcome presence, like a “hot wind in a room that people invent an excuse to escape.” Even his consistent choice of attire is noted, with his suit and tie being compared to a “prison uniform” for those between incarcerations, a peculiar observation that speaks to a deeper critique of his public persona.
Furthermore, there’s a sense that his “traitorous relationship with Vladimir Putin” is a looming concern that will eventually come to fruition, adding another layer of apprehension. While some credit Infantino for his own role in FIFA’s perceived missteps, the core issue remains Trump’s continued influence. The football chants have apparently become increasingly wild and critical with his interference, and the sentiment that he is a “nonce” and that attempts were made to “shoot him in the bonse” reflects the extreme animosity directed towards him.
The frustration extends to the idea that Trump has managed to alienate many Americans, turning them against their own national team and eroding pride in the country, especially as America approaches its 250th anniversary. There’s an expectation that he will attempt to discredit teams that performed better than the US, a tactic that seems consistent with his known playbook of “destroy.” The long-term consequences of his “mafia-like tactics” are predicted to deter international business, particularly in defense contracting, and to tarnish America’s global reputation. A country that elects someone like Trump multiple times, the argument goes, is one that should be viewed with caution.
From a UK perspective, the US loss to Belgium was met with a sense of satisfaction, highlighting how his influence has created divisions even among allies. Ironically, the player in question, Balogun, represents the USA due to birthright citizenship, a concept Trump himself attempted to challenge. The possibility of Trump influencing Infantino to somehow overturn the loss, or to present a special trophy, is seen as absurd, especially given past accusations of ruining “little girls’ lives by raping them.”
The sentiment of “Eat 💩 Don” is a direct expression of anger, with apologies offered to Americans who are not aligned with his base. The notion that a player’s career can be negatively impacted by his “petty little bitchbaby” actions, and that a referee’s career could be similarly affected, underscores the perceived damage he inflicts. The fact that an incident involving Balogun has its own Wikipedia page dedicated to it, a consequence of Trump’s alleged meddling, is seen as a further indictment.
The criticism that many Americans bash Trump but still voted for him multiple times is a recurring theme, suggesting a lack of accountability. The assertion that “anything that this dumbass touches turns into shit” is a blunt but widely held sentiment. FIFA’s decision to award him a “peace prize” is viewed as an exposure of its own corruption, suggesting his “slime rubs off on all his associates.” He is described in harsh terms as a “selfish, fat, orange rapist” and a “husk of a human being,” whose touch invariably leads to negative outcomes.
The fact that Belgium’s victory was seen as a favor to the World Cup, and that America is accused of cheating and getting what it deserved, reflects a deep-seated resentment. The observation that non-Americans insulting America are merely reiterating sentiments shared by millions of Americans themselves highlights a profound internal disillusionment. The expectation that Trump would “insert himself into this event and instantly make everything worse” was universally held by those not part of his “cult.”
The recurring phrase “everything he touches turns to shit” is a powerful summary of the sentiment. He is deemed a “total douchebag,” along with his “rotten family,” and their alleged “cheating” is seen as the reason for the loss. The idea that fans gave money to FIFA, which in turn gave money and a peace prize to Trump, points to a perceived perversion of sportsmanship and integrity.
There’s a debate about attributing blame to “America” versus “Americans,” with the point being made that Trump won a majority of votes, indicating a significant portion of the population either supported him or was indifferent. This leads to a feeling that those who didn’t want him in power now have to bear the consequences, a sentiment captured by a cynical quote about democracy. The prediction that Trump will oversee the 2028 LA Olympics, and the associated dread, speaks volumes about his perceived disruptive influence. His tendency to “force himself onto others” is seen as a characteristic that extends to his public actions.
Finally, the US team is credited with making an “honorable choice” by not fielding Balogun, thereby avoiding further complication. However, the overarching feeling is that Trump “cheapened and poisoned” both the American team and the World Cup, turning what could have been a positive event for America into something that served only his ego. The sentiment that he is the “Antichrist” and a harbinger of misery underscores the depth of the negative impact attributed to his influence.