At a White House event honoring military moms, President Trump’s hands were notably covered in mismatched concealer and appeared swollen. This continued a pattern of the president using makeup to cover bruises on his hands, with both hands now showing the treatment. While the White House attributed the bruising to frequent handshaking and aspirin use, the visible concern over his health persisted alongside public displays of drowsiness and other perceived ailments. Despite these health questions, the president seemed in good spirits during the event, praising the first lady and recounting a humorous anecdote about autocorrect issues with her name.
Read the original article here
The recent appearance of former President Donald Trump, at 79, has sparked considerable commentary regarding his health, particularly concerning the visible swelling of his hands. This observation, coupled with the noticeable application of makeup that did not quite match his skin tone, has become a focal point for many. The sight of his hands, described as being “caked in two different shades of concealer—neither one was the right match for his skin tone,” has led to a wide range of reactions, from pointed observations about his grooming choices to more pointed discussions about his physical well-being.
Some have expressed that the former president appears to be wearing an excessive amount of makeup, drawing comparisons to that of a beauty influencer. This observation, for some, stands in contrast to the image of an “alpha male” that some of his supporters might project. The discussion around his hands, and indeed his overall health, is often framed not as genuine concern but rather as an expression of anticipation for a particular outcome. The phrase “Tick tock” appears, suggesting a sense of time passing and an expectation of future events.
Interestingly, a perspective from a nurse offered a potential medical explanation for the appearance of his hands. According to this view, the swelling might not be indicative of a deeper health issue but rather an “IV infiltration.” This explanation posits that the swelling could be a result of IV fluid being administered, perhaps for dementia medication like Kinsula or Lecanemab, and that the fluid might have leaked or caused the vein to “blow” during administration or flushing. This interpretation suggests that the visible puffiness on the back of the hand, rather than the fingers themselves, is what’s notable and could be attributed to such a medical procedure.
However, for many observing the situation, the word “concerns” feels entirely misplaced when discussing Trump’s health. Instead, the prevailing sentiment expressed by some is one of “excitement and impatience,” a desire for events to unfold more rapidly. The mention of Mother’s Day, for instance, is framed in a darkly humorous way, suggesting how certain mothers might be “happy” on that day, implying a wish for his departure from public life. The visual of his hands is also a source of derision, with one comment humorously suggesting a “Always Sunny” style approach, using “big hands with duct tape.”
The specific makeup application, with its mismatched shades of orange and concealer, has drawn comparisons to a “paint swatch wall at a Lowe’s.” This aesthetic critique is frequently linked to the broader discussion of his health, with some explicitly stating that their “concern” is actually “hope” and openly wishing for a specific health event, using phrases like “You can do it, little blood clot.” The anticipation of such an event is described as something that would lead to widespread celebration and “impromptu parties” in cities, a sentiment that highlights a deep division in public perception.
The debate over his health is also juxtaposed with media coverage. Questions are raised about whether news outlets would devote the same level of attention to his physical and mental state as they have, or would, to Democratic presidents facing health challenges. This suggests a perception of biased reporting. The makeup he uses is even mocked, with suggestions that he should use the same “paint” he applies to his face on his hands for a more consistent, albeit still criticized, look.
The sentiment of “Good. This is good,” when applied to observations about his health, clearly indicates a lack of sympathy and a desire for a negative health outcome. Phrases like “Any time now cholesterol…” reveal a sardonic anticipation. The description of him as a “meat puppet” further underscores a perception of him being unhealthy and driven by his lifestyle choices, further exacerbated by mentions of “diet cokes and McDonald’s dinners.”
A specific theory circulating is that he receives a “monthly dementia medication infusion,” and that the visible makeup application is a consistent pattern following these treatments. This fuels further speculation about underlying cognitive issues. The comparison to Bruce Willis’s temporal lobe dementia is made, with a sad acknowledgment that Trump is “not anywhere close” to that point yet, and a sarcastic wish that Bruce Willis were president instead. The intense negativity is captured in phrases like “Fuck you Donny! Stop teasing.” and “Wake me when last rites are being given.”
There’s also a recurring theme that Trump’s actions, including his appearances and perceived health issues, are deliberately staged to generate headlines for publications like The Daily Beast. This is characterized as “tiresome catnip” and “not newsworthy,” with a clear desire to be informed only when a more definitive event occurs. The reappearance of him dyeing his hair, after a period of letting it go white, is seen by some as a sign of vanity overriding any genuine health concerns or acceptance.
The idea of being “concerned” is repeatedly dismissed by many, with statements like “I have zero concern” and “Who the fuck is concerned? Nobody is ‘concerned’ about his health.” Instead, there is an open admission of actively rooting for his decline: “We are on the side of whatever is rotting him from the inside. We’re cheering for it to win.” This stark admission reveals the depth of animosity and the absence of empathy in many of the reactions.
The discussion around his skin color and makeup application is also quite pointed, with the observation that “Skin colour is orange. How can they get it wrong?” and the comment that he wears “more makeup than a drag queen.” Even his handshakes are scrutinized, with a humorous jab about a dentist having a “very firm handshake.” The recurring motif of “darkness” and “silence” appearing in comments evokes a melancholic and almost morbid tone, underscoring the intense emotions surrounding his public persona and perceived health.
The apparent attempt to correct the appearance of his hands with mismatched concealer is seen as a futile effort. The description of him as “cheap and useless just like everything he represents” further solidifies a negative and dismissive viewpoint. The sentiment that he might be trying to draw attention away from King Charles’s “swollen fingers” is also brought up, suggesting a competitive aspect to his public appearances. Ultimately, many express a clear lack of concern, viewing any apparent health issues not as a cause for worry but as “appetizers to the great big main course,” a euphemism for the anticipated end of his public career.
