By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Responding to concerns about ideological bias in existing college-level coursework, Florida has introduced a state-developed alternative to the Advanced Placement U.S. History course. This new program, part of the Florida Advanced Courses and Tests (FACT), aims to offer students a pathway to earn college credit while adhering to the state’s guidelines against “woke” ideologies. The FACT U.S. History framework is notably shorter than its AP counterpart and focuses on themes such as political and constitutional history and American identity. While this alternative will be accepted for credit at Florida’s colleges and universities, the recognition of these credits at out-of-state institutions remains uncertain.
Read the original article here
Florida is taking a bold and, frankly, quite controversial step by creating its own history course as an alternative to the College Board’s Advanced Placement (AP) U.S. History. This new program, called Florida Advanced Courses and Tests (FACT), is explicitly designed to offer a curriculum free from what the state labels as “woke” ideologies. This move, stemming from a 2023 law targeting such ideologies, aims to provide students with a pathway to college credit that aligns with Florida’s particular vision of American history. The U.S. history FACT course is set to launch as a pilot program this fall, following a similar initiative in College Algebra, though the connection between algebra and “woke” concepts remains a point of curious speculation.
The core of this initiative seems to be a deliberate reinterpretation of historical events, often by sanitizing or downplaying uncomfortable truths. For instance, discussions around slavery appear to be significantly softened, perhaps framed as a “jobs program” or a less impactful aspect of American history. Reconstruction, while possibly factually presented, may steer clear of debates surrounding its failures, instead focusing on themes of federal overreach. Similarly, the Civil Rights Movement might be presented as a story of legislative success, with less emphasis on the powerful grassroots movements that drove significant change.
Furthermore, the new curriculum appears to offer a more sympathetic portrayal of certain historical periods and figures often subjected to critical examination. The Cold War, for example, could be presented primarily as a defensive struggle against communism, potentially leading to a more charitable view of figures like Senator Joseph McCarthy, where students might be encouraged to see his actions as a reflection of a nation’s defensive posture. This approach suggests a conscious effort to minimize critiques of the U.S. system and highlight its positive aspects, effectively creating what some might describe as an “alternative history” class.
This intentional omission or downplaying of certain historical narratives, particularly those related to race, gender, and systemic inequalities, raises significant concerns. Critics argue that this approach amounts to a whitewashing of history, stripping it of its complexities and the difficult lessons it offers. The intent seems to be a curated version of the past, one that avoids challenging students with perspectives that might foster critical thinking about societal flaws or injustices. It’s a stark contrast to the idea that history is often “written in the blood of the poor and minorities,” encompassing a range of difficult events from the Trail of Tears to Japanese internment camps.
The practical implications for students are also a major point of discussion. The primary purpose of AP courses is to earn college credit, usually through an exam administered by the College Board. Florida’s FACT courses are intended to provide college credit at Florida’s own colleges and universities. However, there’s a strong sentiment that credits earned from these FACT courses will not be recognized by institutions outside of Florida. This could place students who pursue these alternatives at a significant disadvantage when applying to out-of-state colleges or universities, effectively setting them up for failure by offering a curriculum that may not prepare them for the rigors of a broader academic landscape.
The move is widely perceived as part of a broader cultural and political battle, an attempt to push back against what is termed “ideological bias” in education. For many, “woke” has come to signify an awareness of societal issues and injustices, making the “anti-woke” approach a deliberate rejection of such awareness. This curated history is seen by some as a dangerous foundation for what they describe as a “white supremacist re-takeover of America,” beginning with the control of educational narratives. The fear is that by labeling and removing challenging historical truths as “woke,” the state is paving the way for a distorted understanding of the past.
Ultimately, Florida’s creation of an “anti-woke” AP history alternative is a deeply divisive issue. It represents a deliberate attempt to shape the historical understanding of young people, prioritizing a particular national narrative over a comprehensive and critical examination of the past. The long-term consequences for students, their educational opportunities, and the broader understanding of American identity remain to be seen, but the initiative has already ignited a vigorous debate about the purpose and responsibility of history education.