By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and his associates have repeatedly reported abuse allegations to federal authorities over many years, yet the system’s failure to act means they are constantly being asked to relive their trauma. They assert that the burden should not be on them to continue reporting, but rather on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate credible allegations and address government mishandling of these cases. In light of recent comments, survivors are again requesting a direct meeting with the DOJ to discuss their concerns, understand past failures, and receive clear answers regarding the handling of Epstein-related records, rather than being asked to re-report their experiences. This comes after attorney Blanche claimed to have met with survivors and their lawyers, a statement challenged by Senator Chris Van Hollen who questioned Blanche’s commitment to hearing their stories directly.
Read the original article here
It appears that a recent update to Donald Trump’s settlement with the IRS has created a situation where the Department of Justice has effectively barred the IRS from ever investigating him, his family, or their numerous businesses again. This development, perceived by many as a quiet but significant move, seems to provide a lasting shield against future tax-related scrutiny for the Trump organization.
The core of this issue seems to revolve around an addendum to a settlement, which some interpret as being far more valuable than any financial settlement itself. This addendum is seen by critics as the ultimate goal, intended to permanently protect Donald Trump, his family, and their businesses from any potential investigations into allegations such as fraud, insider trading, and market manipulation.
Many are expressing strong condemnation, labeling this as the most corrupt action ever taken by a president, and unequivocally stating that Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in American history. The sheer level of perceived corruption is described as insane, leading to sentiments that laws no longer seem to hold any real meaning or consequence for those in power.
There’s a prevalent sentiment that this arrangement is blatant corruption, with no attempt to conceal it. This has led to concerns about the trajectory of the United States, with some believing the country is rapidly descending into corruption and losing its standing on the world stage. The idea of “rules for thee, but not for me” is frequently invoked, highlighting the perceived double standard for the powerful and wealthy compared to ordinary citizens.
Some individuals are urging Congress to take action, suggesting measures like civil asset forfeiture of Trump family assets once a new administration is in power. The hope is that a future Democratic administration, specifically the next Attorney General, will swiftly reverse this decision, as it’s believed this type of arrangement can indeed be changed.
The frustration extends to the feeling of betrayal by the DOJ and legal representatives involved. The notion that taxpayers’ money is being used in ways that benefit individuals accused of wrongdoing, while ordinary citizens face audits and financial scrutiny, is a significant point of contention.
The permanence of this shield is a major concern, with comparisons made to a “get out of jail free” card that extends not only to Donald Trump but also to his children and potentially future generations through the inclusion of his companies. This has led to a deep sense of disbelief and outrage, with many questioning how such a situation could even be allowed to occur.
The perceived ease with which such arrangements are made, without apparent barriers, is also seen as astonishing and indicative of a deeply flawed system. Some believe that this situation is irreversible without a complete dismantling of the current government and the imprisonment of all involved parties.
Looking ahead, there’s a cautious optimism that future elections, particularly a “blue wave,” could lead to the rescission of this settlement addendum. The belief is that such a move can be overturned relatively quickly by the next administration, effectively reopening avenues for IRS investigations.
However, the current sentiment is one of profound disappointment and a loss of faith in the ethical and moral compass of society. There’s a feeling that old standards of ethics and morality are being twisted and ignored to suit the needs of the powerful, leading to a sense that the United States has fundamentally lost its way. The hope remains that future administrations will have the authority and the will to undo these perceived injustices and restore a semblance of accountability.