By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Sollos Yerba Mate, a new beverage company listing Barron Trump as a director, has faced significant backlash prior to its May launch. Social media users criticized the brand’s Spanish-inspired name and focus on yerba mate, a traditional South American drink, in light of the Trump administration’s policies towards Latino communities. Critics have accused the company of cultural appropriation, questioning the family’s association with anti-Latino rhetoric while profiting from a product with deep Indigenous and Latin American roots. The business, registered as Soulstice Inc. with $1 million in capital, is headquartered in Palm Beach, Florida.
Read the original article here
It appears Barron Trump’s latest venture is already facing a significant amount of flak before it even has a chance to truly get off the ground. Whispers of a “get-rich scheme” are circulating, and the public reaction, at least as reflected in online discussions, is far from supportive. The project, described as a yerba mate startup with some initial backing and a planned May launch, isn’t necessarily unusual in its basic concept. However, the very name associated with it seems to be the primary catalyst for the widespread criticism.
The scrutiny is intense, with many commenters drawing immediate parallels to past actions and alleged behaviors of his father and other family members. There’s a strong sentiment that this is just another instance of a Trump family member attempting to capitalize on their name through questionable financial means. This isn’t the first time such ventures have been met with skepticism, and the current reaction suggests that any initiative linked to the Trump name is inherently viewed with suspicion by a segment of the public.
Many of the reactions express a deep-seated distrust of the entire Trump family’s business dealings, with descriptions like “criminals and/or grifters” being used frequently. The idea that Barron Trump, despite his privileged upbringing, is now embarking on his own “get rich quick” endeavor strikes a chord with those who believe he’s simply following a well-established family pattern. The fact that he was “born rich” is brought up as evidence that the concept of “getting rich” is something he’s already achieved through inheritance, making his current pursuit seem redundant or even opportunistic.
A notable point of contention is the perceived lack of originality in the product itself, with flavors like pineapple and coconut being described as uninspired and reminiscent of existing offerings. This, coupled with the assumption of ulterior motives behind the launch, fuels the narrative that the venture is more about perceived profit than genuine innovation. The speed at which the website apparently crashed during its initial stages has also been a point of ridicule, with some sarcastically questioning the “genius” or “visionary” labels that might be associated with such a setback.
Some commenters even go so far as to suggest that Barron lacks the specific “gift for scamming” attributed to other members of his family, implying that his attempts at financial maneuvering might be less sophisticated. The idea that generational wealth can dwindle over time due to “idiocy and greed” is brought up, with the hope that the Trump fortune will eventually dissipate. This sentiment underscores a desire for the family’s financial success to be curtailed, with Barron’s new venture seen as another potential avenue for their alleged “grift and corruption.”
There’s a recurring theme of disappointment that Barron, instead of potentially pursuing a more conventional or ethical path, seems to be following in the footsteps of his father and uncles. His perceived disconnect from the “common American” due to his upbringing is also a point of criticism. The association with social media during election cycles and the potential for manipulating stocks, as suggested by some, further cements the view that this venture is tied to a pattern of what critics perceive as self-serving and potentially exploitative behavior.
The intense criticism also extends to Barron’s appearance, with his hairstyle and general presentation drawing negative comments. This personal commentary, while not directly related to the business venture, adds another layer to the overall negative sentiment surrounding him and his endeavors. The overall impression is one of a young man perceived as being complicit in a family legacy of questionable business practices, and his latest attempt to forge his own path is being met with deep skepticism and even outright hostility. The hope from some quarters is that he will learn from experience that “screwing people over has no real upside,” a sentiment that seems to be a direct reflection of the critical reception his venture is already receiving.