By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Over the weekend, anti-President Donald Trump messages were broadcast from hacked crosswalk audio signals in Denver, specifically along East Colfax Avenue. The devices, recently powered on with factory default passwords, delivered vulgar and accusatory messages to pedestrians, sparking surprise and concern. City officials have since changed the passwords at the affected intersections and do not anticipate further incidents. The Denver Police Department is currently investigating the matter.
Read the original article here
It seems Denver’s crosswalks got a little more vocal than usual this past weekend, and their message was definitely not about pedestrian safety alone. Several of these audio signals, meant to guide people across the street, were hijacked to broadcast a rather startling and politically charged statement. Instead of the usual chime or voice indicating it’s safe to walk, pedestrians were met with a robotic declaration that President Trump “murders children.”
This unexpected development, captured in videos circulating on social media, went further, with some reports suggesting the audio also included expletives directed at Trump and reiterated the accusation of him harming children. The surprise element was amplified by the fact that these devices were still in their factory settings, utilizing a default password that, as it turns out, is quite accessible online.
The ease with which these traffic control devices were compromised has raised eyebrows. It’s not just about the message being broadcast, but the apparent simplicity of gaining access to systems that manage public infrastructure. This vulnerability has been noted in discussions, with some comparing it to similar easy-to-access default passwords on other public messaging systems. The implication is that security measures might not be as robust as one would hope for city infrastructure.
The core of the message, however, has sparked considerable debate and commentary. The assertion that “Trump murders children” has been met with a range of reactions, from outright agreement to accusations of defamation. Some commenters have embraced the message as a statement of truth, citing various allegations and past accusations against the former president as substantiation.
For those who support the sentiment, the act of hacking the crosswalks is viewed as a creative and impactful form of protest. They express respect for the ingenuity involved in using public infrastructure to convey such a strong political statement, seeing it as a direct way to communicate a message they believe is factual and important.
Conversely, the legal implications of such a statement, particularly concerning defamation, have been brought up. However, the defense offered by some is that truth is an absolute defense against defamation. If the statement is perceived as a factual assertion rather than a mere opinion, then the act of broadcasting it, even through hacked crosswalks, might be defended as not causing harm in the legal sense.
The underlying sentiment among many of those commenting on this event is a deep-seated belief that the accusations leveled against Trump are valid. There’s a strong undercurrent of agreement that the message, however delivered, reflects serious concerns about his past actions and alleged behavior. This belief is often supported by references to various accusations, including those of sexual assault and other alleged wrongdoings.
The fact that the hacked messages were broadcast in Denver specifically has also led to some commentary. Some have questioned why a different city or state wasn’t targeted, while others suggest that Colorado might be a particularly fertile ground for such a protest, or perhaps simply a location where this particular vulnerability was exploited.
Beyond the specific accusations of murder, there’s a broader discussion about the alleged predatory behavior attributed to Trump. Comments frequently mention accusations of rape and other forms of sexual misconduct, suggesting that the “murder” claim is part of a larger pattern of disturbing behavior. The connection is often drawn to his past business dealings and public persona, with some even referencing unsubstantiated theories about cannibalism.
The discussion also touches upon the broader political landscape, with some commenters linking the alleged actions of Trump to the voting patterns of certain demographics and regions. The implications of these allegations, according to some, are reflective of larger societal issues and political affiliations.
Interestingly, the wording used in reporting the event has also been a point of discussion. The distinction between a “claim” and a “statement of fact” is being debated, with some arguing that the hacked message isn’t a mere claim but a verifiable truth. This highlights the strong convictions held by those who believe the accusations against Trump are undeniable.
The effectiveness and purpose of such a protest are also being considered. While the immediate impact might be on unsuspecting pedestrians, the intention, as perceived by some, is not necessarily to sway Trump voters, who are seen as resistant to any negative information. Instead, the message is believed to be for the wider public, aiming to reinforce existing concerns or inform those who may be less aware.
Ultimately, the hacked crosswalks in Denver have served as an unexpected platform for a potent political message. While the method of delivery is unconventional and raises questions about infrastructure security, the content of the message itself reflects deeply held beliefs and accusations that have clearly resonated with a significant portion of the public. The incident has transformed mundane urban infrastructure into a temporary, albeit controversial, loudspeaker for a charged political indictment.