By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Justin Lee Fisher, a process server, was arrested on suspicion of trespassing on Travis Kelce’s property in Kansas, reportedly attempting to serve a subpoena to Taylor Swift on behalf of Blake Lively in a legal matter. Fisher has entered a year-long diversion program that, upon successful completion, will likely result in the dismissal of the trespass charge. Fisher, who was acting in his professional capacity, sought the diversion program to avoid a criminal conviction that could jeopardize his private investigator license. The defense lawyer, Christopher Scott, and Fisher appreciated the understanding of the city prosecutor in reaching this amicable resolution.
Read the original article here
Man charged with trespassing at Travis Kelce’s house was trying to serve Taylor Swift subpoena. This is the story of Justin Lee Fisher, a man who, according to reports, found himself in hot water after attempting to serve a subpoena on Taylor Swift at the residence of her boyfriend, Travis Kelce. The incident, which occurred at approximately 2:15 a.m. on September 15th, involved Fisher being charged with criminal trespassing. The heart of the matter seems to be a dispute over the validity of his actions and whether he was legitimately attempting to serve legal documents or engaging in something more questionable.
The crux of Fisher’s defense, at least initially, was that he was merely attempting to fulfill his duties as a process server. He claims to have entered the property through an open gate and attempted to speak to security guards, intending to hand over the paperwork. He asserts he was never told to leave or spoken to before the police arrived and arrested him. However, the details of the situation raise many questions.
One of the more peculiar elements of the case is the timing. Why attempt to serve a subpoena at 2 a.m.? It’s certainly not standard procedure, and it opens up the possibility of less-than-honorable motivations. Furthermore, a judge had, reportedly, previously denied the team’s request to subpoena Taylor Swift only two days prior. So, what was the purpose of this late-night visit? It would appear there might not have even been a valid subpoena for him to serve. Adding to the murkiness, information reveals Fisher had a troubled past, having lost a previous job as a police officer due to a domestic violence incident.
The legal process for serving documents can seem rather peculiar to those outside the legal world. In the United States, personal service—physically handing documents to the person named—is often required. While there are rules, the practice can feel cumbersome. However, Taylor Swift and her legal team do have established methods for receiving legal paperwork. Considering this, there was very little reason to sneak into someone’s property to serve a subpoena.
Ultimately, Fisher has agreed to enter a diversion program and pay a fine. He will pay $1,000, and if he completes the program, the trespass charge could be dismissed. This outcome, in itself, is a point of contention. Some argue that if Fisher were merely doing his job, he should not have to pay anything, yet, the fine and the program may be a strategic choice. A small price, perhaps, to make the charges vanish from public record.
The circumstances surrounding the case suggest a potentially deeper issue. The judge did not approve the subpoena. The address also has an agent for receiving paperwork. This brings into question the intent of the late-night visit and raises the possibility of intimidation tactics. There is certainly a sense that this situation involved more than a simple attempt to serve legal documents.
The idea that someone would jump a fence at 2 a.m. to serve legal papers is, frankly, bizarre. Process servers may sometimes take on shady methods, but in this case, the unusual circumstances make that seem likely. This, compounded by the time and the history, casts serious doubt on the legitimacy of Fisher’s actions. It is worth noting that, despite what Fisher says, there is no need to commit a crime to serve a subpoena.
It’s also worth highlighting that Fisher was on Travis Kelce’s property, not Taylor Swift’s. The article makes a point to emphasize this. The act of trespassing, regardless of the reason, is still a crime. The fact that the target was a celebrity adds another layer of complexity to the situation. Celebrities often face increased scrutiny and potential threats, and the presence of someone trespassing on their property late at night will understandably raise security concerns.
The story has a few glaring contradictions. Fisher stated that he went through the gate when it opened and attempted to speak to security, yet he also claims he was never spoken to. One has to question this series of events. This is a very common defense, and the details surrounding this account are less than consistent.
Ultimately, the case underscores the unique challenges of serving legal documents, the potential for questionable motivations, and the heightened security concerns that accompany celebrity status. It is a cautionary tale about the intersection of law, process, and celebrity culture.