Despite the Department of Justice asserting that Pam Bondi is no longer obligated to appear for her deposition due to her departure from the Attorney General’s office, the House Oversight Committee intends to proceed with securing her testimony. The committee maintains that the subpoena was issued to Pam Bondi by name, not by her title, and plans to contact her personal counsel to schedule a new date. This push for testimony stems from the committee’s ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the public release of related Justice Department files, with some members emphasizing the need for accountability and answers for survivors.
Read More
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has issued an order that is anticipated to result in the dismissal of Steve Bannon’s criminal conviction for defying a congressional subpoena. This action by the justices overturns a prior appellate ruling and allows a trial judge to consider dropping Bannon’s indictment and conviction in the interest of justice. While largely symbolic, as Bannon has already served a prison sentence, this move follows a shift in the Justice Department’s stance after the Trump administration resumed its role. A similar order was also issued in the case of former Cincinnati Councilman P.G. Sittenfeld, who had been convicted of bribery and extortion.
Read More
Despite Pam Bondi’s departure from the Justice Department, House Democrats assert that a previously issued subpoena compelling her deposition on April 14 regarding the Epstein files remains legally binding. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted to compel Bondi’s testimony, aiming to examine potential mismanagement of the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, the circumstances of Epstein’s death, and compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This continued demand underscores a bipartisan frustration with the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein records, with Democrats forcefully arguing that Bondi must still provide sworn testimony despite her change in position. The committee’s authority to enforce the subpoena, even after Bondi’s ouster, suggests the political fight over these documents is far from over.
Read More
Democrats are voicing strong concerns that Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi appears to be sidestepping a congressional subpoena concerning her involvement or knowledge related to the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The situation escalated during a closed-door briefing where Bondi, along with her deputy, Todd Blanche, reportedly declined to commit to fully cooperating with a subpoena issued by the Republican chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. This refusal to definitively pledge cooperation has led to significant frustration and accusations of evasion from Democrats on the committee, who walked out of the briefing.
The core of the dispute revolves around Bondi’s perceived reluctance to commit to testifying under oath in relation to the Epstein investigation.… Continue reading
The US House panel has taken a significant step in its ongoing investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, issuing a subpoena for Attorney General Ashley Moody. This development comes after considerable internal debate within the committee itself, indicating a clear, albeit perhaps reluctant, move towards obtaining testimony under oath. The very fact that a subpoena was issued, reportedly with a bipartisan vote, suggests that the initial attempts to gather information voluntarily may not have yielded the desired results, leading to this more assertive action.
The decision to subpoena Attorney General Moody signals that the committee believes her testimony is crucial to uncovering further details about the Epstein case.… Continue reading
The House Oversight Committee has voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify regarding the Justice Department’s handling of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. This bipartisan decision, with five Republicans joining Democrats, seeks to clarify how sensitive files were managed, archived, or potentially withheld. Lawmakers are demanding transparency on what evidence, including videos, audio, and documents, the Justice Department may be concealing, with advocates emphasizing the need for justice for survivors and accountability for any mishandled evidence. The subpoena follows persistent criticism over the document release process, alleged over-redaction, and concerns from within the Republican party about a lack of transparency.
Read More
The House Oversight Committee has voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi for a deposition regarding the Department of Justice’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and compliance with document disclosure laws. This action stems from criticism and reports that the DOJ has failed to release all Epstein-related files and has even removed previously public documents from view. Representative Nancy Mace spearheaded the motion, asserting that the DOJ’s actions represent a significant cover-up.
Read More
The House Oversight Committee has voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to answer questions regarding the Justice Department’s handling of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. This bipartisan vote, with five Republicans joining Democrats, signals ongoing frustration over the department’s review and release of these files. Critics, including members of Bondi’s own party, have expressed a strong desire for transparency and answers concerning Epstein’s abuse and his connections. This action comes after the Justice Department’s previous assertions that no further Epstein files would be made public, a stance that ignited considerable backlash and led to legislative demands for their release.
Read More
Congressman Ro Khanna expressed satisfaction with Congresswoman Nancy Mace’s call for Howard Lutnick to appear before their committee, indicating confidence in securing sufficient votes to subpoena him. Lutnick, in an October interview, recounted a disconcerting encounter with Jeffrey Epstein in 2005 where Epstein described his daily, specific massage routine, prompting Lutnick to vow to avoid future contact. This dramatic anecdote, shared by Lutnick, seemingly underscores the foundation for the committee’s interest.
Read More
The Justice Department has subpoenaed the Federal Reserve, prompting President Trump to deny any knowledge of the investigation while also criticizing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Powell responded by stating the Justice Department is threatening possible criminal indictment related to his Senate testimony about renovations, viewing it as part of the administration’s pressure campaign to lower interest rates. This move follows Trump’s prior expressions of considering legal action against Powell. The investigation has drawn criticism from senators, with some vowing to oppose future Trump nominees for the Fed until the matter is resolved.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood