By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In Boston, on December 4th, immigrants approved for naturalization were unexpectedly pulled from line at the oath ceremony by USCIS officials. This action was taken due to the immigrants’ countries of origin, stemming from the Trump administration’s designation of 19 high-risk countries. Two days prior, USCIS had instructed employees to halt all immigration applications from these specific nations, impacting both green card and citizenship applicants. These actions have been met with criticism, with many immigrants expressing feelings of devastation and fear.
Read the original article here
Immigrants Approved for Citizenship ‘Plucked Out’ of Line Moments Before Pledging Allegiance: Report
The sheer audacity of it all. It’s almost unbelievable, but apparently, it’s happening. Reports are surfacing about individuals who have diligently navigated the labyrinthine path to U.S. citizenship, passed all the necessary tests, and were mere moments away from the naturalization ceremony and the pledge of allegiance, only to be abruptly “plucked out” of line. It’s a cruel act, a slap in the face to those who have invested years, money, and emotional energy into becoming Americans. The feeling is that those in charge are acting like sadists.
The fact that these individuals have already been approved for citizenship, implying they’ve met all the legal requirements, makes this even more egregious. They’ve followed the rules, played the game, and yet, at the very last moment, their dreams are seemingly snatched away. This immediately calls into question the very definition of “due process” and “fairness.” It’s as if the system is deliberately designed to instill fear and create an atmosphere of uncertainty.
The core issue seems to stem from directives issued by federal agencies, specifically targeting nationals from certain countries already subject to travel restrictions. One can only wonder what criteria, beyond national origin, are being used. This isn’t just about immigration; it’s about the erosion of trust in the government and the principles upon which this country was supposedly founded. This feels like a performance of cruelty, a spectacle designed to demoralize and punish.
It’s completely understandable to feel a sense of betrayal, as if the promises of America are hollow. The experience of citizenship ceremonies should be a celebration of inclusivity and a welcoming of newcomers. Instead, the narrative paints a picture of fear and uncertainty. The reported actions don’t align with the ideals of liberty and justice that the nation claims to champion.
The process of naturalization itself is often a daunting one. The years of waiting, the mountains of paperwork, the financial burdens, and the pressure of the tests are not to be taken lightly. To have all that culminated in approval, only to be removed from the ceremony, is beyond disheartening. It raises questions about the recourse available to these individuals. Are they disappeared? What happens to their lives? It’s simply not fair.
The article mentions that a citizenship test in general would be difficult for US citizens to pass, adding another layer of the injustice. These people have proven their dedication by preparing for, taking, and passing the test.
The comments express outrage regarding the fact that this is not about legal versus illegal immigration. Those being targeted are legal residents, and have already been approved for citizenship.
It is disheartening, and the language describing it reflects that sentiment. How can a country that espouses freedom and equality act in such a manner? This is not just a policy issue; it’s a moral failure. To treat people this way is not only unethical but also undermines the very fabric of American society. The notion of “rules of law” has been eroded.
The report highlights a disturbing pattern of actions taken by those in the administration. From the targeting of individuals based on their ethnicity and language to the pressure on immigration judges to deny citizenship, there’s a clear indication that it’s all about control. There’s a consistent denial of due process.
The comments express the desire for legal repercussions for those involved, and the implications of this action are far-reaching. The article highlights that these are civil rights violations, suggesting that billions of dollars of lawsuits are likely.
The overall sentiment is one of disgust, shame, and a deep-seated feeling of betrayal. This is not the America that many believe in, and the actions described are antithetical to the nation’s core values. The article encapsulates a sense of outrage at the actions, which is a common feeling, and a call for accountability. The actions are beyond the pale.