In an unusual early morning social media post, President Donald Trump expressed strong opinions regarding the Supreme Court’s deliberation on birthright citizenship. He suggested that the justices should have viewed a particular Fox News program to understand arguments against granting citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants. The President’s remarks follow the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on his executive order to end birthright citizenship, a move that has been rejected by lower federal courts. Despite the conservative leanings of the current Court, including justices appointed by Trump, skepticism has been apparent regarding the executive branch’s authority to alter this constitutional provision.
Read More
The political arena has once again been set ablaze, this time by a Congresswoman’s unvarnished and forceful response to Donald Trump’s actions. The phrase “f— him to his face” has become a rallying cry, encapsulating a sentiment of profound frustration and defiance directed squarely at the former president. This outburst, sparked by Trump’s attendance at oral arguments concerning birthright citizenship, highlights a growing impatience with what many perceive as his deliberate provocations and his continued disregard for established norms.
The Congresswoman’s initial statement, though laced with strong language, resonated with a significant portion of the public who feel that Trump’s behavior has pushed the boundaries of acceptable political discourse for far too long.… Continue reading
During Supreme Court arguments regarding birthright citizenship, a majority of justices expressed strong skepticism towards President Trump’s executive order. Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s questioning of Solicitor General John Sauer, particularly concerning his theory of “domicile” and “allegiance,” appeared to seal the administration’s loss. Barrett highlighted the historical context of the 14th Amendment, questioning how Sauer’s theory could reconcile with granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people, whose circumstances did not align with notions of voluntary domicile. Ultimately, the exchange suggested that the justices favored a simpler, “jus soli” approach to citizenship, based on place of birth, over the complex familial and allegiances proposed by the government.
Read More
Even conservative justices expressed significant doubt regarding the Trump administration’s bid to alter birthright citizenship. Probing questions from Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Gorsuch and Barrett challenged the administration’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, suggesting the arguments presented were not persuasive. The case hinges on the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, with the administration arguing it was intended only for freed slaves, a view contested by opponents who highlight a century of precedent.
Read More
President Donald Trump made a historic appearance at the Supreme Court, attending oral arguments concerning his order to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. This marked the first time a sitting president has observed arguments at the nation’s highest court. Trump later reiterated his stance on Truth Social, calling the current policy “stupid.” The case centers on interpreting the 14th Amendment’s clause regarding those “born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
Read More
President Donald Trump made an unprecedented appearance at the Supreme Court to argue against birthright citizenship. However, his bid to overturn the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment faced significant skepticism from several justices, including his own appointees. After less than 90 minutes, Trump departed, later posting on social media that the U.S. is “STUPID” for allowing birthright citizenship. The hearing centered on an executive order aiming to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to noncitizen parents, a move already blocked by lower courts and contested by legal scholars who deem it highly unlikely to succeed.
Read More
South Korea’s Foreign Ministry announced that it considers North Korean prisoners of war captured in Ukraine to be South Korean citizens, a stance communicated to Ukrainian officials. The ministry cited the sensitive nature of the situation and the prisoners’ safety when declining to offer specific details. Furthermore, the ministry requested media outlets protect the prisoners’ identities and avoid exposing them to public attention, emphasizing their right to humane treatment under international law. This request followed media reports, including interviews that showed the faces of the POWs, where they expressed desire to seek refuge in South Korea.
Read More
The woman, arrested by ICE agents in Maryland, was detained for 25 days despite presenting substantial documentation, including a birth certificate and immunization records, to prove her U.S. citizenship. Her lawyers claim there’s overwhelming evidence of her citizenship. The woman expressed shock over her detention and hopes the legal case against her will be resolved quickly. The incident highlights the potential for wrongful detention even with readily available proof of citizenship.
Read More
During a press briefing, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stated that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers may request proof of citizenship from individuals near targeted enforcement operations. This follows reports of ICE agents asking for identification from individuals, including U.S. citizens, during protests and legal observer activities. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, yet Noem’s comments have raised concerns regarding potential implications for citizens’ rights. Legal experts are speaking out, with some arguing that the practice of requesting identification from U.S. citizens absent reasonable suspicion is unconstitutional and that Americans are not legally obligated to carry proof of citizenship.
Read More
Amid rising tensions and protests in Minneapolis, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem defended ICE agents’ actions, stating that they may request identification during targeted enforcement operations. She insisted that all actions taken by ICE officers adhere to legal protocols. Noem’s comments followed reports of federal agents detaining U.S. citizens, including incidents caught on video. Furthermore, she did not advise Americans to carry proof of citizenship, and stated that the agents were doing everything correctly.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
ICE Places Ankle Monitor on US Citizen Despite Birth Certificate
The woman, arrested by ICE agents in Maryland, was detained for 25 days despite presenting substantial documentation, including a birth certificate and immunization records, to prove her U.S. citizenship. Her lawyers claim there’s overwhelming evidence of her citizenship. The woman expressed shock over her detention and hopes the legal case against her will be resolved quickly. The incident highlights the potential for wrongful detention even with readily available proof of citizenship.
Read More