By John Q. Hosedrinker 
US Southern Command announced on Sunday its 21st strike on an alleged drug-trafficking vessel in the Eastern Pacific, resulting in the deaths of three individuals. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was engaged in narcotics smuggling along a known trafficking route. This latest strike brings the total number of individuals killed in these operations to 83. The campaign, intended to disrupt drug flow into the US, has faced criticism, with some allies like the UK and Colombia halting intelligence sharing over concerns of legality.
Read the original article here
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the initial reaction is one of disbelief and outrage. The very notion that the US military is repeatedly engaging in lethal strikes against vessels suspected of drug trafficking, resulting in the deaths of individuals without any semblance of due process, immediately raises red flags. It’s impossible to ignore the fundamental principles of justice and international law that seem to be disregarded in these actions. The question that hangs heavy in the air is simple: where is the accountability?
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the core of the problem lies in the blatant disregard for established legal protocols. The idea of summarily executing individuals based on suspicion, no matter the alleged crime, is a dangerous precedent. This raises the uncomfortable question of whether these actions constitute state-sponsored terrorism, as defined by international law. The consistent targeting of these vessels, without any public evidence of the supposed illicit cargo, further fuels the suspicion that these operations are motivated by something other than a genuine attempt to curb drug trafficking.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and a disturbing pattern starts to emerge. If a vessel is suspected of carrying drugs, why not intercept it? Why not board it, gather evidence, and bring those involved to justice through a fair trial? The alternative, the one that’s actually happening, seems to involve a shoot-first-ask-questions-later approach. It feels like this approach undermines the rule of law and risks turning the US into a purveyor of violence, a state that does what it wants, while the world watches.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the hypocrisy of this situation is glaring. While the military is allegedly killing “small-time fishermen,” certain figures appear to be receiving pardons for far more significant drug-related offenses. This creates a perception of selective justice and suggests a deeper, more troubling agenda at play. It appears that political maneuvering and personal loyalty are taking precedence over basic ethical principles.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and this may serve a larger and more insidious purpose. The actions described feel like a trial run. The normalization of these extrajudicial killings could pave the way for more egregious acts in the future. It’s also plausible that these actions are being orchestrated by higher powers, as a means to solidify and maintain control.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the consequences of such actions are far-reaching. The deaths of these individuals will likely fuel resentment and anger, potentially radicalizing others and creating a cycle of violence. This strategy is shortsighted and counterproductive.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the very concept of “narco-terrorism” is being misused and exploited. The justification for these strikes, if it exists, hinges on the notion that drug traffickers are, in effect, enemy combatants. However, that designation does not automatically give anyone the right to kill people. A declaration of “terrorist” status should be followed by the correct legal processes.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the actions raise serious questions about the chain of command. How many people are aware of what is happening, and why hasn’t anyone spoken out? If these orders are illegal, as the evidence suggests, those involved should face prosecution, not just at the international level, but in their own country as well.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and one can’t help but wonder if this is about something else entirely. Is it about taking out the competition? Is it about a power grab? The fact that the target of these strikes is a vessel allegedly involved in drug trafficking, while other, more significant avenues of drug supply remain untouched, suggests this is not the case. It is all starting to resemble the actions of a mobster rather than those of a nation upholding law and order.
US military carried out 21st strike on alleged drug boat, killing 3, and the situation is a moral and legal travesty. The lack of oversight, the secrecy surrounding these operations, and the disregard for human life are deeply disturbing. It’s time for a thorough investigation, and it’s time for those responsible to be held accountable.