Extrajudicial killings

Boat Bombings: Shocking Revelations Emerge as War Crimes Suspected

Sens. Tim Kaine and Rand Paul revealed that U.S. military boat strikes in the East Pacific and Caribbean are occurring without verification of drugs or arms aboard, a practice legal experts deem illegal. The Trump administration claims authorization for these strikes, which have killed at least 205 people, by labeling activities as “insurgency and asymmetric warfare,” a justification widely considered ludicrous. Despite the lack of evidence of drugs or arms, and the acknowledgment that strikes are not a long-term solution, the operation continues with a severe lack of transparency and accountability.

Read More

Pentagon Admits Boat Strike May Have Killed Trafficking Victims

Nine months into the Trump administration’s campaign against suspected drug boats, a pattern of over 60 attacks resulting in more than 200 extrajudicial killings has emerged. The anomaly lies in the first strike on September 2, 2025, which resulted in 11 deaths, prompting questions about the unusually large crew. Military officials have suggested these individuals may have been victims of human trafficking or other forms of illicit cargo, raising concerns about the accuracy of targeting protocols and the potential for civilian casualties.

Read More

US Military Kills Identified Fishermen: Humanity Stripped Away

A five-month investigation has identified 13 previously unknown victims of US attacks on suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, bringing the total number of identified victims to 16. These attacks, which have resulted in nearly 200 deaths, are justified by the US as combating “narco-terrorists.” However, the investigation reveals that many of the identified victims came from impoverished communities and showed no clear indication of drug trafficking involvement. Critics argue these strikes have not disrupted the drug trade but have instead devastated vulnerable communities, questioning the legality and effectiveness of the operations.

Read More

Trump Administration Conducts Third Deadly Boat Strike in Five Days

The Trump administration’s campaign of bombing small boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific has continued, with a recent strike resulting in two deaths and one survivor. This marks the third such attack in five days and the 57th overall under the administration, bringing the death toll to 192, a practice criticized as illegal summary execution by human rights advocates. Despite claims of significantly reducing drug flow into the US, evidence suggests no impact, with some relatives of victims asserting those killed were merely fishing. The administration has also failed to provide evidence linking the targeted vessels to drug trafficking, and even when survivors are present, as in a recent instance where the Coast Guard was activated for search and rescue, the campaign has persisted with no discernible effect on drug imports.

Read More

Trump’s Drug War Fails: Attacks on Fishermen Unaffected

The article challenges the Pentagon’s claims that attacks on civilian boats have significantly reduced drug imports to the United States, calling these assertions baseless. Experts and members of Congress argue that these strikes, part of Operation Southern Spear, constitute illegal extrajudicial killings because the military is targeting civilians without an imminent threat, a deviation from standard drug interdiction practices. Furthermore, evidence suggests the boats attacked are not transporting fentanyl as claimed, and the overall impact on drug flow and overdose deaths is negligible, contradicting official statistics and demonstrating a misunderstanding of the drug trade as an economic rather than military problem.

Read More

Trump Boat Bombing Spree Kills Hundreds

On April 26, the US military, under the direction of SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel in the Eastern Pacific, claiming it was involved in narco-trafficking and operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. This action, which resulted in the deaths of three individuals, is part of a broader series of attacks that have led to an estimated 185 fatalities. Human rights experts and legal scholars argue that such operations at sea, regardless of the alleged criminal activity, lack justification under international maritime law and constitute extrajudicial killings. These incidents echo concerns raised regarding similar alleged extrajudicial killings in the Philippines, where a former president faces charges of crimes against humanity.

Read More

Organizations Demand End to Third-Country Complicity in US Extrajudicial Killings

A global coalition of 125 organizations is urging states to cease all support for U.S. extrajudicial killings of individuals on boats in the Caribbean and Pacific, which have resulted in over 175 deaths since September 2025. These operations, targeting suspected narco-terrorists, are argued by the coalition to violate international law by lacking due process and occurring outside recognized armed conflict. The appeal extends accountability to third-party countries facilitating these attacks through intelligence sharing, military base access, and other forms of assistance, as states permitting these actions risk complicity and legal responsibility. This international outcry highlights growing concern over the normalization of lethal military force against individuals not meeting the legal threshold for an “imminent threat.”

Read More

US Boat Strike Survivors Speak Out Against Terrorist State Tactics

The crew of the Don Maca fishing vessel described a harrowing ordeal wherein their boat was attacked by drones and subsequently boarded by soldiers from a US-flagged patrol vessel. Following the drone strikes, which injured several crew members and destroyed the boat, the fishermen claim they were detained at gunpoint, their possessions confiscated, and their vessel set ablaze before being transferred to another patrol boat and eventually handed over to Salvadorian authorities. This account raises serious questions regarding the legality of US military operations against alleged drug-trafficking vessels, with no evidence provided to support the claim that the fishing boat was involved in illegal activities. The incident highlights the potential for extrajudicial killings and violations of international law in the ongoing US campaign.

Read More

US Military Strikes Kill 5 on Alleged Drug Boats Amidst Due Process Concerns

The U.S. military reported destroying two drug-smuggling boats in the eastern Pacific, resulting in five deaths and one survivor, as part of an ongoing campaign against alleged traffickers in Latin America. This incident adds to a significant number of fatalities in similar strikes since early September. U.S. Southern Command claimed the boats were targeted along known smuggling routes, though no evidence of drugs was presented. The administration justifies these escalations as necessary to combat drug flow and overdoses, despite criticism regarding legality and effectiveness, particularly concerning land-based fentanyl trafficking. Concurrently, the U.S. is preparing a naval blockade of Iranian ports.

Read More

U.S. Accused of War Crimes by Leaving Boat Strike Survivors to Drown

After a U.S. strike on three boats in the Pacific Ocean on December 30, the U.S. military abandoned its search efforts for survivors who had jumped into the sea. The Coast Guard called off the search citing a “declining probability of survival,” and a government official confirmed the individuals were presumed dead. These deaths are a part of a larger campaign, with at least 117 civilians killed in 35 attacks since September. Experts and members of Congress have denounced the strikes as potentially illegal extrajudicial killings, as the U.S. has shown a pattern of not assisting survivors and withholding key information regarding the strikes.

Read More