By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the direction of President Trump, US forces conducted lethal strikes on two vessels off the coast of South America, resulting in the deaths of six individuals allegedly involved in drug trafficking. The strikes, which began in early September, have targeted vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, resulting in over 70 deaths to date. These actions have drawn criticism, with the UN human rights chief condemning them as a violation of international law, and Venezuela denouncing them as illegal and aggressive. Despite the attacks, the US has not made public any concrete evidence of the targets’ activities.
Read the original article here
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats. This news, delivered as it was, immediately raises a lot of questions. It’s a statement that needs careful unpacking because, at its core, it speaks of violence, potentially extrajudicial killings, and a blatant lack of transparency. The repeated use of the word “murder” in some reactions highlights the gravity of the situation. Are these “attacks” legitimate military operations, or are they something far more sinister?
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and the lack of presented evidence of the targeted boats being involved in any illegal activity, like carrying drugs, should be concerning to anyone who values due process. The presumption of guilt before any trial, the absence of any form of legal procedure, and the seemingly casual announcement of these deaths are troubling. This is further complicated if these actions are occurring in international waters, which raises complex questions of jurisdiction and international law.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and the reactions paint a picture of deep distrust. The focus on the absence of proof, the questioning of motives, and the comparison to past instances of military overreach – particularly the Vietnam War – all suggest a crisis of confidence in the current administration and its actions. The cynical view that such actions are designed to distract from other scandals, while potentially overly simplistic, does reflect a broader concern about transparency and accountability.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and if these were indeed “drug boats,” it doesn’t automatically justify the killing of the occupants. The concept of “extrajudicial murder” is thrown around, underscoring the legal and moral implications. Even if the boats were involved in illegal activities, that doesn’t necessarily grant the right to kill those onboard without a trial. The presumption of innocence until proven guilty, a cornerstone of any just legal system, seems to have been discarded.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and it brings up the question of the effectiveness of these actions. The implication that this is simply a “pointless fight” against a small-scale problem is striking. It’s suggested that the resources used in these operations could be better used on strategies that address the root causes of drug use rather than engaging in potentially illegal or ineffective actions. The fact that the drug war is still ongoing despite decades of such tactics further fuels this perspective.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and the reactions indicate a widespread feeling of disgust. The casual acceptance of these deaths, the lack of outrage, and the perceived celebration of such actions are all condemned. It’s a disturbing reflection of societal values and priorities, with the US seeming to be becoming a country that embraces violence as a solution to its problems.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and there’s a strong undercurrent of international concern. The implication that bodies like the International Criminal Court at The Hague are “taking notes” underscores the legal and diplomatic ramifications of these actions. The potential for war crimes charges and the damage to the US’s reputation on the world stage are significant.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and the responses also bring up the concept of a military operation with no accountability. This has always been the case and it will continue to happen. With no one there to verify who was on the boats and what their actual intentions were, the likelihood of an innocent fisherman being on board has dramatically increased.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and the outrage seems to stem from a feeling of being misled. The lack of proof, the vague justifications, and the seemingly cavalier attitude toward human life create a sense of betrayal. The public is not only being denied information but is also being treated with contempt.
Hegseth says six people killed in two new US attacks on alleged drug boats, and the final thoughts show a deep cynicism about the US government’s motives. The claim of the US being a “vile tragic little country” is a particularly damning indictment. The implication is that these actions are not only illegal but also serve a more sinister purpose: to silence dissent and consolidate power. The end is truly near.