By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In response to pressure, Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton, the interim US attorney for the southern district of New York, to lead an investigation into Donald Trump’s political adversaries’ connections to Jeffrey Epstein. This decision contrasts with a previous memo from the justice department and the FBI, which found no grounds for further inquiries in the Epstein files. Trump has intensified his efforts to hinder the release of the justice department’s files related to Epstein, potentially influencing the upcoming House vote on the matter. Recent revelations, including damaging emails, have prompted Trump to call for investigations into Epstein’s ties, while also labeling the situation a “hoax.”
Read the original article here
Trump puts intense pressure on Republicans to block release of Epstein files, and it’s difficult to see anything but a frantic scramble to bury something. It’s a classic case of “the cover-up being worse than the crime,” isn’t it? If the files contained nothing damaging, and if accusations were truly a “hoax” as some claim, wouldn’t the obvious move be to fling those files wide open and let the truth – whatever that may be – come out? But that’s not what’s happening. Instead, we’re seeing intense behind-the-scenes pressure, a clear indication that something truly damaging is at stake.
The actions, or rather, the inactions here, are deeply suspect. It’s as though there’s an active effort to suppress evidence that would, presumably, clear his name. It’s reminiscent of a defense attorney desperately trying to keep crucial evidence out of the courtroom, which is the opposite of what an innocent person would do. The implication is obvious and frankly, quite disturbing. The lengths to which this is seemingly going, including pressuring Republicans, certainly suggests a concerted effort to hide something. The logic is twisted – if the accusations are false, then why not allow complete transparency?
It’s hard not to be cynical. It’s easy to see this as a blatant attempt to avoid any possibility of legal consequences, or exposure of deeply unethical behavior. It’s also hard not to consider how many Republicans who have supported the former President would have to answer for their part in this and if they had knowledge of these criminal acts. This isn’t just a political maneuver; it feels like a desperate attempt to protect something, anything, from the light of day. This is a very clear illustration of the old adage: the more you try to contain something, the more it seeps out.
Furthermore, consider the broader context. Trump ran on promises of transparency. He claimed to want to drain the swamp. But here, we see the complete opposite. We see an attempt to shield potentially damaging information from public view. If this were a genuine effort to expose a hoax, the approach would be radically different. The best way to combat any perceived “slander” would be a full release. This whole situation is deeply troubling.
The sheer audacity is something to behold. He claims to be for the rule of law while actively fighting court orders. He claims to care about Americans while ignoring their needs. He seems to be all about proclaiming innocence, and all about preventing the files from being released, because innocent people would not act this way. This behavior is so contradictory, and the inconsistencies are so obvious that it makes it difficult to maintain faith in these claims.
So, where does that leave us? It paints a rather bleak picture of where we are. We’re left with the distinct feeling that something very serious is being concealed, and that the fight to keep these files hidden is more important than the truth. It’s a sign that they really have something to hide. It’s the most basic question: If there’s nothing to hide, then why are they hiding? It’s a question that many, many people are asking right now, and one that demands an answer.