During his Senate confirmation hearing for Director of National Intelligence, nominee Jay Clayton repeatedly refused to state who won the 2020 election. This refusal is seen as a pattern for Trump nominees, who avoid admitting Biden’s victory to appease Donald Trump. Senator Jon Ossoff relentlessly questioned Clayton, highlighting his apparent lack of knowledge regarding his predecessor’s activities and national news. Clayton, a Wall Street attorney with no intelligence background, has been appointed to key positions by Trump, raising concerns about his qualifications for the intelligence chief role.
Read More
During a confirmation hearing, Senator Jon Ossoff questioned President Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, Jay Clayton, about the results of the 2020 presidential election. Clayton repeatedly refused to state who won the election, despite acknowledging an obligation to be honest and forthright with the committee. This refusal prompted Ossoff to express incredulity and argue that Clayton’s inability to answer a fundamental question about election results was disqualifying for a leadership role in the intelligence community. Observers have stated that Clayton’s response demonstrated a willingness to deny objective reality to appease the former president, posing a clear danger to the integrity and independence of the intelligence apparatus.
Read More
In response to pressure, Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton, the interim US attorney for the southern district of New York, to lead an investigation into Donald Trump’s political adversaries’ connections to Jeffrey Epstein. This decision contrasts with a previous memo from the justice department and the FBI, which found no grounds for further inquiries in the Epstein files. Trump has intensified his efforts to hinder the release of the justice department’s files related to Epstein, potentially influencing the upcoming House vote on the matter. Recent revelations, including damaging emails, have prompted Trump to call for investigations into Epstein’s ties, while also labeling the situation a “hoax.”
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker