By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Suffolk County has been ordered to pay $112 million to hundreds of immigrants after a federal jury determined their constitutional rights were violated. The lawsuit stemmed from detentions in county jails between 2016 and 2018, where 674 individuals were held for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) despite having posted bail. News outlets have reached out to the county for comment, but have not received a response.
Read the original article here
Federal jury awards $112M to immigrants detained by Suffolk for ICE, and the immediate thought is, wow, that’s a hefty sum. It really drives home the scale of the issue. It’s not just a theoretical problem; it has real financial consequences, which can bring a bit more focus to the situation. It forces us to confront the reality of what was happening and what it cost.
The core of the matter centers around the period between 2016 and 2018, the years when the detentions occurred. The fact that these individuals, who had already posted bail, were then held for ICE raises serious questions about due process and legal overreach. It’s easy to see why a jury would feel compelled to act when confronted with such a situation. It signifies a clear violation of basic rights.
The article mentions that the county and the county sheriff’s office are responsible for this particular bill. It underscores the financial burden on the local community, the taxpayers of Suffolk County. That’s a crucial point, highlighting how these actions ripple outwards, impacting the community directly. It would be different if it came directly from the federal coffers.
Interestingly, there’s a strong sentiment that this kind of financial reckoning might be just the beginning. The feeling is this might only be the tip of the iceberg, given the broader scope of potential lawsuits and the scale of the actions of the relevant actors. It also makes you wonder what the ultimate cost of these actions will be.
It’s interesting to note that several people brought up potential for Supreme Court involvement, with some expressing concerns that the ruling could be overturned. This speaks to the ongoing political climate and the potential for shifts in legal interpretations. However, the actions took place under a previous administration. The point of appealing this now is hard to discern.
Of course, the debate about who ultimately pays the price is a recurring theme. There’s the general acknowledgement of the financial burden on taxpayers, but also the potential for reappropriating funds from “ill-gotten wealth”. The idea of potentially using funds from other sources, such as reappropriating ill-gotten wealth, offers a sense of justice or at least a symbolic effort to make those responsible also accountable.
The article raises concerns about the potential implications for American society in general. The worries about the long-term impact on the country, and the possibility of other forms of legal action and consequences in the future. The very possibility of bankruptcy is brought up, in a context of the current political environment.
There’s also a clear condemnation of the actions of ICE, and by extension, the administrations that enabled them. The rhetoric used is very strong, using words like “Gestapo” to describe the program’s actions. It is a clear expression of outrage, a sense that these detentions were not only illegal but also inhumane.
The fact that the detentions happened even after bail was posted is the key. The details of the cases show clear violations of the law, not just by the federal agents, but also by the local authorities who facilitated these actions. The actions of the Suffolk County racists, as some call them, are the ones who committed the crime.
There’s also an important thread about how the entire situation reveals a deeper problem, the erosion of the rule of law. It’s a sentiment of concern about the future, the idea that these actions are part of a larger pattern. The conversation expresses a sense of uncertainty about what the country will look like if these actions continue to be sanctioned or even encouraged.