By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, purportedly authorized the purchase of Spirit Airlines jets for deportation flights, but it was later discovered the airline didn’t own the planes nor did they have engines. This plan was reportedly paused due to the revelation and objections from ICE officials, who warned of the high cost. The DHS also acquired two Gulfstream jets during the government shutdown, drawing criticism from House Democrats, despite a previous bill allocating substantial funds for immigration operations. These purchases highlight ongoing issues surrounding the handling of immigrant deportation, including the use of planes for transportation.
Read the original article here
DHS head reportedly authorized purchase of 10 engineless Spirit Airlines planes that airline didn’t own. The story, or rather, the series of events that have come to light, paints a rather confusing picture, to put it mildly. We’re talking about the Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, supposedly signing off on a deal to acquire ten Boeing 737 aircraft from Spirit Airlines. Here’s where it gets weird: Spirit Airlines doesn’t actually fly, nor has it ever owned, Boeing 737s. Spirit has a fleet exclusively made up of Airbus A320 family aircraft, which they mostly lease. It’s like trying to buy a house from someone who doesn’t own it, or perhaps more accurately, doesn’t even have access to it.
Immediately, the questions start piling up. How did this happen? Was it a simple mistake, a case of gross incompetence, or something far more concerning? And why is this happening while the government appears to be in shutdown? One can’t help but wonder if this is the tip of a very large, iceberg-like corruption scheme. The acquisition of these airplanes is not in line with what we know about Spirit Airlines’ operations.
The potential purchase also doesn’t stop at questionable aircraft acquisitions. Adding to the intrigue, there’s the detail of the planes being “engineless.” Buying airplanes without engines is like buying a car without a motor – it’s not particularly useful on its own. It’s an additional layer of bewilderment that raises suspicions. And it’s not like they are going to put the planes on trucks and haul them to their destination, as an anonymous commenter noted. How do you transport an airplane without an engine? All of this prompts a lot of questions.
The entire situation seems to reek of a potential payoff. It’s not just about the questionable nature of the purchase itself; it’s about the context. There are claims of huge spending on contracts for deportation flights, and reports of other large expenditures. The sheer scale of these transactions raises questions about whether the government is mismanaging funds, buying stolen assets, or engaging in a more elaborate scheme. It looks more like money laundering and grifting.
Adding to the complexity, the reported actions of DHS officials don’t seem to make sense, especially when you consider that the same department was also acquiring luxury jets. According to reports, the Coast Guard entered into a sole-source contract during a government shutdown, to purchase two new G700 luxury jets, at a cost of $200 million. This only adds fuel to the fire, as there appears to be a pattern of questionable spending.
It is worth noting that a DHS spokesperson has attempted to clarify parts of the story, stating that certain details were inaccurate, but refused to elaborate. This is not exactly a reassurance, and it further raises the level of suspicion. Transparency is key, and the refusal to provide details only adds to the mystery and the growing perception that something is very wrong.
It is easy to focus on the surface-level details. The mix-up of plane models, the engineless state of the aircraft, and the airline that doesn’t fly them. However, it’s essential to look beyond the surface, and consider how a series of events like these might be indicators of deeper issues. Could this be a coordinated effort to siphon public funds into private hands? The potential scale of the financial transactions, the questionable choices, and the lack of transparency all point in that direction.
Many observers are also pointing to a lack of due diligence. How can one authorize the purchase of aircraft without checking on the specifics? How could they not know the condition of the planes, or more importantly, who actually owned them? To be fair, this is a valid point. There’s a certain amount of incredulity when discussing the facts as they’re presented. The lack of basic oversight, or the blatant disregard for established procedures, makes it difficult to dismiss the story as simply incompetence. It’s a classic case of assuming malice over stupidity.
This entire situation comes across as a symptom of a deeper problem. The idea of the government being closed to everyone except those who are taking part in the potential corruption, is more unsettling. One can only hope that, whatever is going on, it can be quickly addressed and those responsible can be held accountable. And maybe, once the dust settles, there will be more answers than questions.