By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In his evening address, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasized the importance of Ukraine’s long-range warfare capabilities in achieving peace. He revealed detailed discussions with military command regarding the use of missiles and drones, focusing on production, delivery, and crew training. Zelenskyy asserted that Ukraine will significantly scale up its long-range weapon use in the coming months, and a more active approach in preparing and implementing long-range sanctions against Russia is planned. He concluded that increased effectiveness in long-range capabilities will expedite the path to peace, highlighting Ukraine’s commitment to precision strikes and a desire for peace, unlike Russia.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy: The more effective Ukraine is in long-range strikes, the sooner it will achieve peace.
It seems pretty clear, doesn’t it? The ability for Ukraine to strike strategically, to hit those targets that matter, is directly linked to how quickly this conflict will end. The idea that more potent weaponry, specifically long-range missiles, is a key to peace isn’t just a hope; it’s a logical conclusion drawn from the realities of war. The more Russia feels the sting of effective Ukrainian action, the quicker they might be forced to the negotiating table, and the sooner we can envision an end to the suffering.
The lack of long-range capabilities has, in many ways, prolonged the conflict. The reluctance to provide these tools feels like a significant strategic misstep, a hesitation that has allowed Russia to maintain its advantage and dictate the tempo of the war. It’s a shame that the fear of escalation, the “nuke card” as it’s been referenced, has held back the provision of the very tools Ukraine needs to defend itself effectively. This isn’t about aggression; it’s about self-preservation and the right to protect your people and your land.
The debate surrounding the political motivations and actions of different leaders, especially within the United States, certainly complicates the narrative. Criticisms of past administrations and their perceived failings to fully support Ukraine, or to even provide the necessary equipment on time, are valid. The historical context matters. The political game, the geopolitical chess match, it muddies the water, but the core point remains: the more effective Ukraine is in its ability to strike, the quicker peace is likely to follow. It’s about having the tools to deter further aggression, to protect strategic infrastructure, and to force a shift in the balance of power.
It’s frustrating to hear about policies, limitations, and hesitations from various political figures and their administrations. The failures of certain leaders to fully commit to Ukraine’s defense, along with the US’s failure to uphold prior obligations, are indeed a part of the problem. These strategic obstacles have prolonged the war and created even more challenges for Ukraine.
This also isn’t about blaming a single individual or party. It’s about acknowledging the consequences of decisions and actions, or inaction, on a global scale. The lack of decisive action, the delays in supplying the necessary weaponry, these all contribute to the prolonged suffering. It’s a complex situation, and pointing fingers doesn’t solve it, but the point remains: effective long-range strikes can drastically change the course of this war.
The focus needs to remain on supporting Ukraine’s military. It is imperative to provide the necessary tools for their military to succeed. This means long-range strikes. This doesn’t mean wanting to “blow up Russia,” but it means being able to target strategic military locations, to disrupt supply lines, and to degrade Russia’s ability to wage war. This is a pathway to deter further aggression, to force a shift in the balance of power, and ultimately, to bring about a quicker resolution to the conflict.
Ultimately, the goal is peace. It is not a simple equation, and it will never be easy. But it is obvious to the observer that allowing Ukraine to defend itself with long-range strikes increases the likelihood of peace. When one side is forced to take the situation seriously, the end of conflict is much closer at hand. This has never been more obvious.