By John Q. Hosedrinker 
US forces have killed 14 individuals in recent strikes targeting four alleged drug boats in the Pacific Ocean, marking a further escalation in the campaign against drug traffickers. The attacks, authorized by President Donald Trump, resulted in one survivor who was rescued by Mexican authorities. These strikes are part of a broader operation that has killed at least 51 people, primarily in the Caribbean and off the coast of South America, and raised concerns regarding their legality and the president’s authority to order them.
Read the original article here
The recent news of the “US killing 14 in strikes on four alleged drug boats in the Pacific” has definitely stirred up some strong reactions, and honestly, it’s hard not to feel a sense of unease. The core of the issue boils down to this: can a government, any government, justify killing people based on the *allegation* of wrongdoing, without any due process? It’s a question that cuts right to the heart of fundamental rights and the rule of law.
It’s crucial to understand the context here. According to reports, these strikes, carried out under the direction of President Donald Trump, targeted boats suspected of carrying drugs. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated the vessels were identified as narco-trafficking boats, transitioning along known routes. However, the critical point is that these individuals were not brought before a court of law; they were not given the opportunity to defend themselves. The argument is this: without verifiable evidence, without a trial, how can we be sure these were actually drug runners and not, say, fishermen, or innocent people caught in the wrong place at the wrong time? We’re talking about taking lives, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
One survivor was rescued, and while the reports indicate Mexican search-and-rescue personnel took responsibility, the condition and whereabouts of this individual are unclear. The fact remains, though: the United States government is being accused of extrajudicial killings, and this situation demands scrutiny. Consider the perspective of the people involved. These individuals, accused of crimes, were effectively executed without any form of trial. This certainly raises profound questions about justice, human rights, and the lengths to which a nation should go to combat illicit activities, particularly in international waters.
The situation has caused tensions between the US and the governments of Colombia and Venezuela. The implication is that these strikes are part of a broader campaign to target drug traffickers, but the lack of transparency is alarming. We’re told the intelligence apparatus verified the identity of these vessels, but the public hasn’t seen this evidence. There’s a disconnect between the claims and the proof, and that gap is where skepticism grows. It’s hard not to wonder what exactly constitutes sufficient evidence in these cases. Are there constant satellite images of drug loading and transit? And what type of drugs were they supposedly carrying? The lack of information leaves room for doubt.
The comparison to drone strikes in other conflict zones, such as Afghanistan or Iraq, is also important to consider. Drone strikes, especially those carried out by the military, are often against armed insurgents in areas of conflict. Moreover, these operations are frequently justified under international laws or self-defense. This situation is different. Here, there doesn’t appear to be a known zone of conflict.
What is being said is that the United States is essentially acting as judge, jury, and executioner, on the high seas. This raises questions about international law and sovereignty. If the US can target alleged drug traffickers in this manner, what’s to stop other nations from doing the same? It’s a slippery slope, and it calls into question the values of due process and basic human rights. It’s easy to say, “They’re bad people, so it’s okay,” but that path can lead to a world where anyone can be killed based on unsubstantiated claims.
The underlying issue is the demand for drugs in the United States. No matter how many boats are sunk, as long as there’s demand, traffickers will find a way. The focus should arguably be on treatment, education, and addressing the root causes of drug addiction.
It’s natural to have sympathy for the victims of the drug trade. But it’s also important to remember that these are accusations of murder and if we don’t hold the government accountable, this will continue to happen.